Why Do We Support the United Nations (UN)?

Despite the sequester which hurt hundreds of thousands of American people who work, the State Department is planning to boost spending on the United Nations in 2014 by more than 4 percent to at least $3.6 billion. The most recent tally on the website of the White House Management and Budget website, for example, lists support for the U.N. at $7.7 billion in 2010. If you look at the percentage of funding by nations to the UN compared by the highest economical producers you will notice the disproportional donations from countries.

Country Funding	Contribution	Country	World Economy
United States	22.0%	United States	22.0%
Japan	12.5%	China	13.0%
Germany	8.0%	Japan	7.0%
United Kingdom	6.6%	Germany	5.0%
France	6.1%	France	4.0%
Italy	5.0%	Brazil	3.5%
Canada	3.2%	United Kingdom	3.3%
China	3.2%	Russia	3.1%
Spain	3.2%	Italy	2.9%
Mexico	2.4%	India	2.7%
All others	27.8%	All others	33.5%

Why aren’t China, Brazil, Russia, Italy and India paying their share of funding the UN when they are all members China, Brazil, and Russia are the members of the UN with some of the most horrific human abuses and the same three keep blocking many other nations from doing what is right. If they are the top 10 leaders in the world and the UN is the leading council in the world then they need to be paying their fair share. The western allies in the top 10 pay 69% of the UN’s funding yet in the top 10 economy they are only 46.2%. China, Brazil, and Russia combined in the top 10 contributors’ equal 3.2% given yet in the world economy top ten they are 19.6%; shouldn’t they be given their fair share? We break even but Japan pays 44% more then they should, Germany pays 37.5% more then they should, United Kingdom pays 50% more then they should France pays 34.4% more then they should, and Italy pays 42% more then they should. China pays 3.2% and should pay 13% an increase of 406%, Brazil pays 1.6% and should pay 3.5% an increase of 219%,, and Russia pays 1.6% and should pay 3.1% an increase of 194% just to bring them even to what we pay per percentage. I think things are a little skewed; so how well do they manage this money?

Signs of the problem spilled out in testimony that a gigantic Russian-based air transport company paid at least $700,000 in “consulting” fees to a United Nations procurement officer, in an arrangement involving at least 10 to 12 U.N. contracts awarded to the firm; sounds like good old extortion. Two U.N. officials have already been arrested, leading to one guilty plea so far. Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of contracts have been questioned, and earlier this week, an independent consulting report described the U.N. purchasing department which spends the bulk of taxpayer dollars contributed to the U.N. as inept, disorganized and ripe for malfeasance. There is so many instances of this, where the UN has either squandered or embezzled dues given to make the world a better place. What about their human rights?

What is the UN doing on the front of human rights? When you look at the current members of the Human Rights Council you wonder why no less then 14 of the members are committing atrocities against humans every day including several known to support slavery and child executions. Does this sound like the people we need to be supporting? In many areas where the UN goes to spread food and medical aid you hear of the same atrocities over and over. A new WikiLeaks cable shows U.N. "peacekeepers" were holding food hostage from starving, underage girls in the Ivory Coast, until sexual acts were performed to as "payment" for food. The UN uses their vehicles to transport terrorist around Syria and In Israel they are using UN ambulance to transport terrorist. A video has revealed that youth camps run by a United Nations body and funded in part by the United States teaches Palestinian children to hate Jewish people. The camps are run by the U.N. Relief and Works Agency and are targeted to children, Israel National News reported. A documentary of camps activities called “Camp Jihad” and produced by the Nahum Bedein Center for Near East Policy Research shows that some Palestinian children may be receiving an anti-Israel message. What this tells us is you can not trust or expect the UN to police their people from abusing the power they have self imposed on themselves. What are they trying to impose on all countries?

In their words, “The world needs a global capital and it should be the capital of Islamic Turkey, Istanbul.” The one religion responsible for 90+% of all terrorism is what they want to be in charge of us all. Saudi King Abdullah demanded a U.N. resolution Saturday condemning insults on religions but only Muslim religions. What does this mean; I you call a terrorist a Muslim terrorist who followed the Koran you have insulted the religion and in their countries you can be put to death. UN representative Richard Falk stated, “First, its thesis is that America is to blame for last week’s atrocity,” talking about the Boston Bombing. So we as Americans are responsible for the Boston Bombing. The United Nations Special Reporter on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights has warned Americans not to elect Republican Mitt Romney so now they are wanting to tell you how to vote. I didn’t care for Mitt Romney but as an American you can vote for who ever you like and the UN shouldn’t be involved. Did you know the UN wants to impose a $1,300 tax on all American families? There was an article that said President Obama may even allow the UN to tax Americans directly. Did you know the Obama administration has backed the UN resolution to make the US pay for global health care? Did you know the UN tried to get a treaty signed which would sensor the internet and what you post or can see? Now the UN is trying to tax the internet. The UN also wants to remove our 2^nd Amendment rights at all cost and many of our politicians agree. Some politicians rejected the United Nations “sustainability” scheme known as Agenda 21 for the threat it represents to national sovereignty but the UN tried and the UN is so over intrusive even opposes the US Home School. Anti-Americanism at the United Nations are routine. Every few days, some kind of statement comes out of the United Nations condemning the United States. The UN has even called for the boycott of US companies because we sell to Israel.

We should leave the UN and use the money we spend there to help our people. The UN no longer follows the charter for which it was formed and in now just a cesspool of corruption which hurts the world and the US today more then it helps them.  A new entity lets say called the “The Human Universal Stability Team (TRUST) for Human Rights” needs to replace the UN with the foundation being freedom. It should indorse the freedom to practice your religion and freedom from being ruled by religion which you disagree. It should be founded on the freedom of speech with no secretes being tolerated. The next premise should be complete openness of the budget, expenses, and actions of everyday dealings to promote trust and remove most criminal activities. You could join but can only be on counsels once you have shown true freedom of these premises. The UN has corrupted all that it was founded for and now is what it was made to prevent; we and our allies need to leave it and form TRUST or something similar; anything is better then the UN.

The Truth of Black and White in our Society

 When you take a standard which has been set and accepted as our moral standard from when our great nation was founded (the Christian standard) and remove that standard without replacing it with another moral standard, you will get chaos which is what we have today. I like numbers, unlike politicians raw numbers never lie. According to the last census 72.4 percent of Americans were White and 12.6 percent were black which makes up 85% of our population. In 2011 according to the FBI, 47.9% of murders in the US were committed by whites while 49.7% of all murders were committed by blacks. Rapes were 65.0% whites compared to 32.9% by blacks but remember whites are 72.4 % of the population and blacks are 12.6% of the population. If you want to check out receiving of free handouts, white make up 38.8% while blacks make up 39.8% which are paid for by working people of all races.

I believe there is a direct correlation between crime rates, free handouts, and the decay of a system of morals. If a person never learns they can be more then a collector of free handouts, when they want more the only way to achieve more is through crime. When they, especially boys don’t have a father figure or a respectable mother figure at home they tend to join gangs, what do they have to loose, their family, the gang becomes their family. No not everyone receiving free handouts are criminals but children from a one parent or a broken home in one report was nine times more likely to commit crimes; another report said it was 70% more likely to commit a crime. What ever the number it is up there and our children are paying for their parents’ immorality. I grew up in a broken home but my dad was definitely not a week father figure. I learned quickly that your actions caused you consequences; I also learned hard work would get you what you desired even when I was told by others I couldn’t make it, I was from the wrong side of the tracks. If the family unit and the moral stature are not present in the home, that child no matter their race will more then likely become a criminal. The last census showed 29% of whites and 73% of blacks born out of wedlock, if my theory is right this is one of the main reasons.   

It is amazing that sense 2007 finding any hard data on crime by race or area has became almost impossible. Statistics show more then 93% of black and 85% of whites are murdered by their own race. What is hard to tell from these statistics is given blacks make up 12.6% of the population and committing 49.7% of all murders is the black population commits almost six times the murders per population then whites and 93% of the time it is on other blacks giving them 600% more deaths per capita then the white race; it is like they are committing genocide on their own race. The sad part is the politicians they cling are the same ones that didn’t want them to be integrated in the 1960s and those same politicians who are now holding them down giving them free everything. No matter what race you are, if they don’t have to work for what they get, you will never get past the cap of where you are at. Your politicians know this and this is why they hate proposals like school vouchers, because that would enable your kids to get an education like their kids do.

Inner cities of 250,000 and more are where most blacks and whites are killed and also where the lowest graduation rates take place; I don’t think it is a coincidence. If these parents could send their kids to decent schools it would give them a hand up and a better chance to break this devastating cycle inner city children are caught. Before any of you say a word, private schools do not have to abide by the political correctness, political agendas, and indoctrination which are killing our public schools. Detroit was the epitome of the liberal idea, planning, indoctrination, and execution; as you can see, it failed. The great exodus from Detroit was due to crime, high taxes, and massive regulations; this is where our federal government is trying to head now; it is a great mistake.

Now let's talk about one of the biggest problem between the black and white races, this would be race baiting and prejudice responses. Duke Lacrosse team; Jesse Jackson appeared in Durham hours after the story broke and awarded the accuser, a black student at North Carolina Central University, a full scholarship. Outrage over this seemingly hateful abuse of power by privileged white males over a black woman spread nationwide. He was wrong and him and Al Sharpton never apologized; the accuser has now been charged with murder. Jesse Jackson, "Then along comes the Trayvon Martin case, and facts that are not in contention: Volunteer neighborhood watch captain George Zimmerman pursued and then gunned down the unarmed 17-year-old last month, and never faced arrest because police said there was no evidence to contradict his claim that he fired in self-defense." The facts pointed to Trayvon was on top beating Zimmerman so Zimmerman did not pursue him and gun him down as depicted by Jesse Jackson; again he, Al Sharpton, and others twisted the facts and used the unfortunate death of the kid to drive a wedge between races and when a white Austrian get shot by a black kid what is Jesse Jackson's response, "the shooting of a white jogger in Oklahoma by three young men is frowned upon." Do you have any idea why white people are so upset of this comment. If a white leader said, "the shooting of a black jogger in Oklahoma by three white men is frowned upon"; they would no longer be a leader in the white community but they are allowed to stay and held up in the black community.

Trayvon was no angel but it is sad he came to that end but there was no racism found no matter how hard these racist leaders tried to put it there. Their continuous action of race baiting will cause most people to turn a deaf eat to racial issues. Because of their constant racial bias and discrimination, when you have a true racial incident it will be missed because everyone will just think its another Duke Lacrosse case; this is call the "Crying Wolf" effect. This does no good for either the black or white community and needs to stop. Ever life is precious no matter the color of their skin; if you believe in what Martin Luther King Stated, "not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character", then both communities need to open up to the other.

Why are Unions Flailing & Failing?

Before we start, I am not for or against unions; I am for good unions, against bad union, and against any union saying I have to join a union to get work or promoted. This being said, what are good and bad about unions and the biggest question is why, according to the New York Times “Share of the Work Force in a Union Falls to a 97-Year Low, 11.3%” has unions declined?

The American Federation of Labor, founded in 1886 and led by Samuel Gompers was the first union to last in the US. It was composed of several small groups which helped coordinate strikes and became a strong political entity. In 1955, the AFL merged with Congress of Industrial Organizations forming the AFL-CIO and is currently the most influential union in the US. All other unions were formed from the initial foundation of the AFL union and many split off due to conflicts within from dues to ethics. Unions peaked in 1954 at 28.3% of the work force and has been falling ever sense and today is 11.3% of the workforce. Today all the states with 15% union workers or more are in financial trouble according to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics; why is this?

Union Pros:

1.      The right to strike- When strikes were first started it was over not being paid when the workers were owed money and over safety. These are two every good reasons unions were formed and adopted. Union helped make the work place safe.

2.      Overtime pay- Many business owners wouldn’t pay their employees who worked over time or on weekend; unions helped force this in early America.

3.      Workmen’s’ Comp- Many early owners also didn’t want to help out any of their workers who was hurt even if it was due to the owners neglect which the unions helped change.

4.      Collective bargaining rights for employees- Helped employees make more money and obtain more benefits.

5.      Wrongful termination laws- If you disagreed with management you could be terminated without reason, the union helped to stop this practice.

Union Cons:

1.      The right to strike- In our recent past we had a union strike costing its employers millions because the employer wanted to expand and picked a different area of the country. The area picked was due to the lower operation cost and much lower taxes. Any company who wants to expand and build new factories or anything else shouldn’t be damaged by its employees. Companies are in the business to make money and if good business sense says put the new factory else ware, they shouldn’t be damaged by its employees.

2.      Collective bargaining rights for employees- This may have started off as a hopefully good thing but has turned massively to the dark. It is responsible for many cities going bankrupt due to the massive pension packages which were from the beginning unsustainable.

3.      Wrongful termination laws- This was good but is now bad. When you have teachers in rubber rooms getting paid who should have been fired and in many cases put in jail. This not only wastes tax payer’s money but rewards bad behavior.

4.      Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) - prohibits employers from using a lie detector test on an employee. As always when a politician puts a restriction on you they always exempt themselves from it: Federal, state and local governments are excluded. If our governments want to use it to ensure the honesty or dishonesty of an individual they want to hire, why can’t the people? Have you ever heard the word “Industrial Espionage?

5.      Compensation increases and evaluations (i.e. raises) - When they are turned to automatic you have a problem. The IRS was caught in many illegal acts lately yet their leadership and employees are due for a bonus; this is a farce.

As I have shown you, union may be good or bad. The original question was,” Why are Unions flailing & failing?”

1.      When you have hard working people working and you have a group of six worker but only four of them earn their money, they get irritated at having to do the other two’s load as well as their own. Many unions just care about the dues and will refuse to get rid of the trash and get two more hard workers to join the other four.

2.      When you have unions trying to take away the Secret Ballot force members to tell them who they voted for; this causes friction and lack of trust in the union.

3.      Who wants to be associated as being a union member of a union ran by a MOB Boss? Not all unions are corrupt but the corruptness of a union is always proportionate to its size. If you have a union being ran by a Mafia Boss I am pretty sure it is bad; it doesn’t take a genius. Most people are basically honest and don’t want to be associated with corrupt people.

4.      When any peaceful demonstration against the union turns in to union bullying, people turn against the union. When you have SEIU thugs beat a man for no reason other then he does not believe the same as the union, when a Michigan Union thugs assaulting reporters and peaceful demonstrators because they do not believe the same as the union, and when in Wisconsin once again have violent union members attacking people, the unions will put a bad taste in the mouth of the people who once supported them; for these action the union is wrong.

5.      When the union sells out its people like they did with Obamacare it turns people against you. President Obama and union leaders both said your premiums would go and President Obama said it would go down by 3000% (skip to 1:05) for companies. According to Forbes Magazine Obamacare will make all premiums rise at a minimum of from 34% to 80% with the Washington Post reporting increases as high as 130%. Everyone who voted for it and those who supported it without reading it has betrayed the American worker; this includes unions.

Now the shocker: I and 75% (not kidding) of my team workers went to our union (you didn’t see this one coming) with a grievance; we along with several others was threatened multiple times by a supervisor. This supervisor sent threatening, falsified documents, and sent vicious email not only to us but also to our customers.  I went to the union with all the evidence, witnesses, emails, and a log of all the offenses with the intent of preventing anyone else from enduring this hostile environment we had endured for months. There were many workers wanting to join the union but watching to see what happened and see how good the union responded. We the workers requested a meeting with the union steward, the supervisor, and their supervisor. The meeting was agreed to and a date and time set but when the day came, the supervisor refused to show saying, “The Union is a waste of my time.” With the entire documentation of falsified document, threatening of workers, and threatening of our customers and the report from the union steward it was a slam dunk case and we went to the union president. The union president refused to do anything, became very condescending toward us, and told all the workers that they didn’t feel like it was worth their while to bring this up; it would just cause more problems. Being one of the top 10 largest unions in the US, you would think the workers would be worth more but I guess we’re not. Now I am not a union member, the 20+ people didn’t join the union, and several other union members who witnessed what happened quit the union because, why pay them if they are not even going to protect you from a hostile work environment.   

Between the invasions of voting privacy, the bullying, the corruptness, the massive extravagant spending (not on union members but on union leaders and politicians), not doing what the unions promised, and betraying the American workers; is it really hard to find out why unions are flailing & failing?”

Why Egypt had a Coup and Do We Have a Dog in This Fight?

What is going on in Egypt? To find the answer we need to take a look back in the history to Anwar Sadat. Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin signed a Peace treaty between Israel and Egypt to end years of wars; enraged Islamists, particularly the radical Egyptian Islamic Jihad which is one of the fathers to the Muslim Brotherhood. On 6 October 1981, Sadat was assassinated by assassination squad was led by Lieutenant Khalid Islambouli after a fatwa approving the assassination had been obtained from Omar Abdel-Rahman "The Blind Sheikh". The same Blind Sheikh who was preaching at three mosques in the New York City area and was responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. After the assassination, then Vice President Hosni Mubarak became president. In 1994, Steven Emerson's television documentary “Terrorists Among Us: Jihad in America” contains a video of Abdel-Rahman in Detroit calling for jihad against the "infidel". Abdel-Rahman called for the murder of infidels, and the ousting of Hosni Mubarak. He did this because President Mubarak up held the peace treaty with Israel and banded all radical terrorist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, who had been responsible for thousands of murders in Egypt.

Now let’s fast forward; Hosni Mubarak bought Egypt out of the dark ages and was a strong ally of the US second only to Israel. When riots started and President Mubarak didn’t receive any help from his 30 year ally the US, instead of a crackdown on the people, he stepped down after 18 days of demonstrations during what is now know as the 2011 Egyptian revolution. On 11 February 2011, Vice President Omar Suleiman announced that Mubarak had resigned as president and transferred authority to the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces. That same day we watched the TV as President Obama talked about the removal of Egyptian President Mubarak; President Obama commented “We are watching history taking place”, “The people of Egypt has spoken, their voices has been heard and Egypt will never be the same”, Egyptian people can find the answers peacefully and in the spirit of unity”, and “Egyptians have made it clear; nothing less then genuine democracy will carry the day”; unfortunately the Muslim Brotherhood gained power and with a known terrorist group in charge in Egypt, all that had been accomplished over the past 41 years seemed to be lost.

In August, the president moved against the military leadership, sending into retirement Field Marshal Mohammed Hussein Tantawi, as chairman of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, had acted the country's de facto ruler in the wake of Mubarak's ouster and prior to Morsy's election. He removed all women who were in any position of power. A few months later, he issued an edict basically making himself a dictator. The opposition poured into Tahrir Square in central Cairo back into the center of public discontent as during Mubarak. In response, Morsy dropped his decree, but the situation remained tense. His supporters beating and detaining opposition protesters during deadly clashes and many protestors were shot in the streets. After a referendum approved the new constitution, Morsy signed it into law but critics argued it was passed too quickly, with liberals Islamist, Christians and other minority opposition groups felt excluded and that their right had been taken away with the Constituent Assembly which gave it a stanch Islamic bias. Human Rights Watch said the constitution "protects some rights but undermines others," and that it "fails to end military trials of civilians or to protect freedom of expression and religion." Read this column written by an Egyptian on why Morsi had to go.

To the shock of Egypt’s backers in the West, the army showed no sign of compromise after its decisive move to depose President Mohammed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood terror group. Fighter jets swooped in Red Arrows-style formation over the capital. At one stage they playfully drew hearts in the sky with their tail-fumes in response to the popular chants of “The army and people are one hand” with which crowds in Tahrir Square welcomed Mr. Morsi’s dismissal from the president’s office; this was not what they had been promised.

The Muslim Brotherhood immediately started murdering Christian and anti-Morsi protested. Our news covered it as the Egyptian military murder by standers but look closer; the Muslim Brotherhood were being protected by human shields while sniping the Egyptian troops. How do you know these people were protecting the snipers, while the snipers shot, sometimes through their legs, they never moved. The Muslim Brotherhood caught and executed 25 Egyptian policemen in the Sinai. Morsi has also been accused of plotting with Hamas another terror group who has been responsible for thousands of innocent people’s deaths.

Why does President Obama (skip to around 0:50) want Morsi back into office when he is a terrorist? If “We are watching history taking place”, “The people of Egypt has spoken, their voices has been heard and Egypt will never be the same”, Egyptian people can find the answers peacefully and in the spirit of unity”, and “Egyptians have made it clear; nothing less then genuine democracy will carry the day”; then wouldn’t this be so this time as well? If the Egyptian people have figured out that they had elected a tyrant and him and his party was going to remove their freedoms, shouldn’t they be allowed to remove them from office; should we be allowed to remove them from office if the same happens in the US? Why do we turn our back on an ally and support a terrorist?

In my opinion we need to stay out of it; if we are going to support the people the first time we need to support them this time but from a distance. I do not know why they elected a terrorist for president, probably because he said they had changed; as I say about all politicians, actions speak louder then words and his actions says "I'm still a terrorist". 

Why Americans Don't Trust Our Government?

Our Founding Fathers were brilliant when they came up with the “Separations of Power” using the writings of Montesquieu. It allows three separate branches of power within the US Government with their own defined power to keep each other in check.  The Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches of the United States government are kept distinct and unique to prevent abuse of power. This provides a check and balance system for our government to prevent a president from becoming a dictator and side stepping the other two branches. Unfortunately today, this is exactly what is happening.

The only time in the past that I have seen abuse of power as portrayed today was under President Nixon who until now was the closes any President has come to being a dictator; he was my most disliked president followed closely by President Carter. Nixon abused his powers but with a press willing to tell the truth back then and not cover for him, his abuse came to an end; today the media is not as noble.

Secretary of State John Kerry said that on 10 June 2013 the Obama administration would sign a controversial U.N. treaty on arms regulation, despite bipartisan resistance in Congress from members concerned it could lead to new gun control measures in the U.S. There was a vote in the Senate with the short brief saying: “To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.” It barely passed with a vote of 53 Yeas, 46 Nays, and 1 not present. What does this mean and why should you care? It means that 46 senators voted to give the UN the right to come on our soil, murder our people, take our guns, and take our freedoms. If one of your senators is in the Nay column you might want to replace the in the next election or if you can recall them now. They voted as follows:

Alabama:	Sessions (R-AL), Yea	Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Alaska:	Begich (D-AK), Yea	Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Arizona:	Flake (R-AZ), Yea	McCain (R-AZ), Yea
Arkansas:	Boozman (R-AR), Yea	Pryor (D-AR), Yea
California:	Boxer (D-CA), Nay	Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
Colorado:	Bennet (D-CO), Nay	Udall (D-CO), Nay
Connecticut:	Blumenthal (D-CT), Nay	Murphy (D-CT), Nay
Delaware:	Carper (D-DE), Nay	Coons (D-DE), Nay
Florida:	Nelson (D-FL), Nay	Rubio (R-FL), Yea
Georgia:	Chambliss (R-GA), Yea	Isakson (R-GA), Yea
Hawaii:	Hirono (D-HI), Nay	Schatz (D-HI), Nay
Idaho:	Crapo (R-ID), Yea	Risch (R-ID), Yea
Illinois:	Durbin (D-IL), Nay	Kirk (R-IL), Yea
Indiana:	Coats (R-IN), Yea	Donnelly (D-IN), Yea
Iowa:	Grassley (R-IA), Yea	Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Kansas:	Moran (R-KS), Yea	Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Kentucky:	McConnell (R-KY), Yea	Paul (R-KY), Yea
Louisiana:	Landrieu (D-LA), Nay	Vitter (R-LA), Yea
Maine:	Collins (R-ME), Yea	King (I-ME), Nay
Maryland:	Cardin (D-MD), Nay	Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Massachusetts:	Cowan (D-MA), Nay	Warren (D-MA), Nay
Michigan:	Levin (D-MI), Nay	Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Minnesota:	Franken (D-MN), Nay	Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay
Mississippi:	Cochran (R-MS), Yea	Wicker (R-MS), Yea
Missouri:	Blunt (R-MO), Yea	McCaskill (D-MO), Nay
Montana:	Baucus (D-MT), Nay	Tester (D-MT), Yea
Nebraska:	Fischer (R-NE), Yea	Johanns (R-NE), Yea
Nevada:	Heller (R-NV), Yea	Reid (D-NV), Nay
New Hampshire:	Ayotte (R-NH), Yea	Shaheen (D-NH), Nay
New Jersey:	Lautenberg (D-NJ), Not Voting	Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
New Mexico:	Heinrich (D-NM), Yea	Udall (D-NM), Nay
New York:	Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay	Schumer (D-NY), Nay
North Carolina:	Burr (R-NC), Yea	Hagan (D-NC), Yea
North Dakota:	Heitkamp (D-ND), Yea	Hoeven (R-ND), Yea
Ohio:	Brown (D-OH), Nay	Portman (R-OH), Yea
Oklahoma:	Coburn (R-OK), Yea	Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Oregon:	Merkley (D-OR), Nay	Wyden (D-OR), Nay
Pennsylvania:	Casey (D-PA), Nay	Toomey (R-PA), Yea
Rhode Island:	Reed (D-RI), Nay	Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
South Carolina:	Graham (R-SC), Yea	Scott (R-SC), Yea
South Dakota:	Johnson (D-SD), Nay	Thune (R-SD), Yea
Tennessee:	Alexander (R-TN), Yea	Corker (R-TN), Yea
Texas:	Cornyn (R-TX), Yea	Cruz (R-TX), Yea
Utah:	Hatch (R-UT), Yea	Lee (R-UT), Yea
Vermont:	Leahy (D-VT), Nay	Sanders (I-VT), Nay
Virginia:	Kaine (D-VA), Nay	Warner (D-VA), Nay
Washington:	Cantwell (D-WA), Nay	Murray (D-WA), Nay
West Virginia:	Manchin (D-WV), Yea	Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Wisconsin:	Baldwin (D-WI), Nay	Johnson (R-WI), Yea
Wyoming:	Barrasso (R-WY), Yea	Enzi (R-WY), Yea

The president is constantly trying to sidestep congress which in effects would make it a dictatorship; I ask; does he have the authority to? Here is the answer. The president is also trying to set up a plan to force people from the suburbs and country side to move into the cities? Watch the whole video. So is this constitutional and does this mean our freedom to live where we want is going to be taken away. No it is not constitution but why is this being covered by more media? I thought President Nixon was the closest to a dictator we would ever see but President Obama has proved me wrong and it does get worse.

Does Homeland Security and FEMA plan to kill 80% of US citizens? This isn’t something I or some nut case made up; this video is from our congress and it is scary. Listen carefully to what Representative John Haller says. I haven’t heard much about this, once again where is our media? When the head of the FBI was asked if a kill order authorizing US citizens to be killed only applied to over seas his response was even more frightening. He was not certain if they were not allowed to murder US citizens in the US. Wikipedia has a page on the Rex 84 plan, short for Readiness Exercise 1984. It was a classified "scenario and drill" developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law. I use to trust my government and devoted over 30 years to it; I don’t trust it anymore and with their poll numbers I can tell you don’t either. We need to stop just putting people into office who want to make money from their position and put people into office who would give up everything for our country; I'm positive that is not Nancy Pelosi.