Gun Control is Killing People

Before we get started lets lay some ground work with the some facts and trigger words Gun Control Activist like to use. A wise man once said, "A right not exercised is a right lost" and this is true with the second amendment, and what is worse is the false information put out by the liberals with the help of bias media. Have you ever heard that every mass shootings in the US has taken place in gun free zones. James Holmes bypassed five closer theaters to go to the one with, "No Weapons Allowed" and shot 82 people killing 12. Why did he pick the "No Weapons Allowed" theater? As all criminals, he knows two things; 1) criminals don't follow the law, and 2) he would be safe from anyone firing back because good citizens follow the law. You will hear many definitions for the key words liberal anti-gun people want to use, mostly all made up. Take the term Assault Weapon, what is the true definition?

The US Military Definition of an Assault Rifle-A weapon that can fire intermediate powered cartridges on "Select Mode" which means fully automatic fire; what we call a machine gun which has been banned since 1936. Law Enforcement, military, and very few civilians or civilian organizations are allowed to own them.

The Liberal Definition of an Assault Rifle-A weapon that fires more then one round.

This is from Senate Bill 23 Assault Weapon Characteristics so before you ask, no I didn't make it up.

A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following: (Why? Makes no since, what does a detachable magazine have to do with fully automatic?)

1. A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon. (Why? Makes no since, this is cosmetic in nature.)
2. A thumbhole stock. (Why? Makes no since, this is cosmetic in nature.)
3. A folding or telescoping stock. (Why? Makes no since.)
4. A grenade launcher or flare launcher.
5. A flash suppressor. (Why? Makes no since.)
6. A forward pistol grip. (Why? Makes no since, this is cosmetic in nature.)
1. A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds. (Why? Makes no since, never seen a FIXED magazine of 10 rounds .)
2. A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches. (Why? Makes no since.)
3. A semiautomatic pistol that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following:
   
1. A threaded barrel, capable of accepting a flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer. (Why? Makes no since, you can legally buy even silencers with a class 3 license.)
2. (B) A second handgrip. (Why? Makes no since, this is cosmetic in nature.)
3. A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel that allows the bearer to fire the weapon without burning his or her hand, except a slide that encloses the barrel. (Why? Makes no since, so you want people to be injured by a rifle?)
4. The capacity to accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip. (Why? Makes no since, this is cosmetic in nature.)
4. A semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds. (Why? Makes no since, I haven't seen a semiautomatic pistol with a "fixed" magazine.)
5. A semiautomatic shotgun that has both of the following:
1. A folding or telescoping stock. (Why? Makes no since, this is cosmetic in nature.)
2. A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon, thumbhole stock, or vertical handgrip. (Why? Makes no since, this is cosmetic in nature.)
6. A semiautomatic shotgun that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine. (Why? Makes no since, the largest detachable shot gun magazine is 5 rounds the same as a standard pump.)
7. Any shotgun with a revolving cylinder. (Why? Makes no since, the largest revolving cylinder shot gun I found is 5 rounds, the same as your standard pump.)
1. "Assault weapon" does not include any antique firearm.
2. The following definitions shall apply under this section:
1. "Magazine" shall mean any ammunition feeding device.
2. "Capacity to accept more than 10 rounds" shall mean capable of accommodating more than 10 rounds, but shall not be construed to include a feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than 10 rounds. (Why? Makes no since, was this baffling enough?)
3. "Antique firearm" means any firearm manufactured prior to January 1, 1899. (Where did they pick this date from? Makes no since.)

None of this comes close to what the military calls an "Assault Rifle", so where did they pull it from; probably out of their stinky hole. This shows how ill-informed and ignorant they are about guns; most of these proposals are all cosmetic and they even removed safety devices. Lets see if they are also speaking out of their stinky holes.

California State Senator Kevin de Leon (Democrats) shows us two things in this clip; one, he knows nothing about guns and two that all liberals use disinformation and fear mongering to try and pass laws to take our rights. Thirty rounds in half a second is 6,360 rounds a minute; even the militaries mini gun which is the fastest shooting weapon we have that I know of can only shoot 6,000 rounds a minute and has six barrels. 

A fully automatic AR style rifle at the max can fire 650 rounds per minute, 10 times less then what our honorable Senator said. He is holding a civilian version which is semi automatic and with a 30 round clips readily available you may if you are extremely good, get 60 rounds off. So are you telling me this honorable senator is flat out lying or didn't research to find the truth before he opened his mouth. It is probably both. Basically he is deceiving and lying to the people about guns; is there others? 

Here is liberal Congressman Diane Feinstein telling us she doesn't want to take our guns but previously she said she wants to take everyone of them. She as all liberals will say what ever they think their audience once to hear and then vote which ever way they want. Liberals seem to have a need to deceive the people because if most of the people knew what they were up to, they would never get back into office.

Mitt Romney says he is not for gun laws but then in this clip he is for strong invasive gun control, this shows another liberal lying to the people. When I say liberal, I am not saying Democrat as you can see because Mr. Romney is a liberal Republican and being liberal is the reason he will never be elected  as president under the Republican party.

Liberals are trying to "Set Up" gun owners for confiscation. Health care personnel are required to ask you questions about owning guns; this is mandated in The Affordable Care Act (TACA) and they will have to document your answers in the system. Because the IRS will be handling The Affordable Care Act and the IRS is considered an "Enforcement Agency" all "Law Enforcement Agencies" will have access to your medical records which will effectively work as a registration of gun owners. This violates The Firearms Owners Protection Act; so in essence the TACA violates the law but that won't matter once they take your guns. A Sheriff is asked if he would assist the Federal Agents in taking everyone's guns; remember I said they were trying to confiscate your guns and many of you laughed. He said it would lead to the second revolution and he wouldn't do it. Most places the Police Chief want to defend the law abiding citizens against criminals but not in Chicago. Garry Francis McCarthy is the current Superintendent (Police Chief) of the Chicago Police Department was appointed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel who by the law wasn't allowed to run for Mayor but this is Chicago; the law doesn't matter. Garry Francis McCarthy is really a politician and the reason the crime rate is still on the rise; he's a liberal and liberals have no clue how to legally deal with crime. 

He should be going after the gang members and criminals in Chicago but him and the mayor would rather go after law abiding citizens trying to protect themselves. This gets worse on the federal level, Mexico wants the United States to provide a registry of all gun owners on border states; why would we even consider that? In case you didn't know, "The Firearms Owners Protection Act" makes required registration of firearms illegal but if it was legal, why would we give a foreign government our citizens private information? If provided this could be used to target US citizens by drug cartels and would be a betrayal of the people by their government.

Many of the anti-gun people say that guns just cause more deaths. The Department of Justice says about 800,000 attacks are stop every year just by showing the attacker you have a gun, and Gary Kleck, Professor at Florida State University Criminology and Criminal Justice, gun study shows up to 2.5 million attacks are stop every year just by showing the attacker you have a gun so just as all liberals, these anti-gun people are talking out of their stinky hole, following a liberal line of thought based at the best on an emotional response to an event instead of hard evidence. Hard evidence would be like all mass shootings taking place in gun free zones. Like it or not, guns, even assault weapons save lives.

A citizen who witnessed an armed robbery and confronted the two robbers, they drew their guns and defending himself, the citizen drew his own weapon and killed both robbers; now the families of the slain robbers want to sue the citizen. It is disturbing what one of their moms says. Another incident there was two Waffle House robbers, one is killed by a citizens and now the family of the robber wants stricter gun laws. All criminals want stricter gun laws because that makes them, the criminal safer but it doesn't the law abiding citizen. A thug with three pending trials for robberies was shot but not killed while robbing a store and the thugs momma is mad as hell at the good Samaritan for "Shooting her Baby", he shouldn't of gotten involved. She should be glad he wasn't a better shot and killed him. These criminals and their relatives is what liberals are turning America to and it needs to be stopped. You even have stories of legally armed citizens saving the police from shooters like Vic Stacy, saving the officers life. Here are a few extras that show why we should be allowed to own and carry across the US.

Mom saves kids with assault rifle.

Citizen with Concealed Weapon Permit Shoots Armed Robber Dead.

Armed Customer with CWP Stops Armed Robber in Wisconsin.

Female store clerk shoots and kills would-be robber who shot her first.

Gun Carrying Man with CCP Ends Stabbing Spree at Salt Lake Grocery Store.

One old man with a pistol bests three teenage robbers.

Gun Owner with CCP Kills Burglar

Young Single Mom Asks 911 For Permission To Shoot Intruder - Actual Call

Tell me that guns don't protect people, that is why most of the gun laws need to be thrown out. If you want to punish criminals more for using guns, great but stop punishing the legal gun owners. Please comment.

Illegals, Terrorist, Gang Members, and Our Border

What country’s people do not care about their safety, security, and sovereignty? Apparently it is ours or at least the politicians from both sides of the isle. The Republicans seem to be the only group wanting our nation to be secured and safe but when they had both houses of congress and the presidency, they didn’t secure the border like they should and promised. The Democrats are trying to make us into the United South, Central, and North America Nation of America; even though the Republicans didn’t take care of business like they should have, they are not, as the Democrats are, trying to destroy our sovereignty. The USA is in serious trouble and unfortunately, our citizens are not smart enough to see through the lies from both parties. The real problem is we are the frog in the pot; what do I mean by that? If you take a frog and throw it into hot water in a pot on the stove, it will quickly jump out; if you take a frog and throw it into cold water in a pot on the stove and slowly turn up the heat, it will stay there until it’s time to eat frog legs; we are the frog! I don’t have a problem with someone coming to our country legally to make their life better. I do not have a problem with different faiths and cultures coming to this great melting pot of the world to add their scintilla to the culture of this great country; this is not what is happening.

Former US Border Patrol Deputy Chief Ronald Coburn reported one in five, that is 20% of illegals crossing the border has a violent criminal record; is this what you want? One in ten, that’s 10% of male crossers already have a violent record in the US court system. The cartels are mocking our security; they are not coming here to contribute to our society but to prey on it. Senator Dan Patrick of Texas said there are at least 100,000 illegal immigrant gang members in the state of Texas. From 2008 to 2012 there was over 143,000 violent illegal alien gang members arrested in Texas charged with 447,000 crimes including 5,000 rapes and 2,000 murders. If Texas is the norm for illegals, this means almost 14% of all illegals are violent criminals accounting for almost 39.5% of all violent crimes in Texas; not just crimes but violent rape, murder, assault with intent to murder type criminals. California who has the most illegal aliens and a higher percentage per capita in their population of illegals would have illegals making up for 57% of all violent crimes committed in California during the same 2008 to 2012 time frame. To compile the problem our Department of Homeland Security is releasing murderers; Pedro Alberto Monterroso-Navas, illegally entered the US and turned himself in, to U.S. Border Patrol agents. He was processed and released in Texas, as are almost all illegal immigrants, and fled to New Orleans where he bludgeoned his girlfriend to death and kidnapped three children. Less than 10% of illegals with court dates show, this is why the you should never let them leave and immediately deport them. US Representative Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) believes Hispanics should get amnesty and citizenship to punish Americans who are against illegal immigration; did he forget what country he is a citizen or is he just betraying his country? Representative Luis Gutierrez is linked to La Raza, an anti-American racist Latino group with the logo, "All for the Race, nothing for the Rest"; you can't get more racist then that. Of course you have these liberal senators and states like Connecticut saying it the right thing to do and forcing it on everyone else; but Connecticut refused to allow illegals into their state; can you say hypocrite? No one will ever face the truth about the illegal crime rate percentage because of political correctness, but there is another side of this story.

All liberals and most Democrats make the argument that illegal immigration has nothing to do with terrorism but they themselves know this is a lie but lying is what they do best.  Our problem with illegals and visa violations are terrorist concerns, we have already caught illegals who were terrorist in the US, not to mention most of the 9/11 terrorist were in the US illegally. The open boarders crowed will say the most idiotic statement is the world like, "illegal immigration along the southern US border is not a contributor to terrorism", are you kidding me? They will then point to allot of data they made up in their head; common since (yes I know these days its not so common) will tell you a terrorist will use your weakest point or easiest vulnerability against you. You have Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano telling Congress that terrorists intending to harm the American people enter the U.S. from Mexico “from time to time." Shouldn't this be a warning? David Harris, former head of operations for the Canadian Intelligence Service and now a strategic intelligence expert, warns the US that Iran is expanding a "fifth column" in Canada. Evidence bears out Harris's warning, Iran is using its Canadian embassy to mobilize it's terrorist organization Hezbollah, to attack the United States; shouldn't this be a warning sign? The major border problem is the Mexican border but we need to keep in mind the Canadian border can be just as dangerous except Canada does try to secure their border where Mexico doesn't even try except from the US.  Border patrol agents have apprehended people from Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Sudan, and Yemen crossing the southern border; not to mention Boko Harama, the Somali far left to Al Queda terrorist which 300 crossed out southern border and are at large in the US somewhere. I wrote a story, "Muslims and Jihadist Training Camps in America" which highlighted 35 terrorist training camps in America highlighted by the FBI; why are they still here? A better question would be why hasn't any president arrested everyone of them? None of the foreign Jihadist flew into an air port or came on a cruise ship, they came through our borders illegally to help train the ones who turned to jihadist from the teaching of their Imam in the Mosques (yes you heard me right) be able to carry out attacks like the DC Sniper who murdered 10 and critically wounded 3 others. Our lack of border control/security and visa control almost enabled another 9/11 type attack in Time Square. On May 1, 2010, Faisal Shahzad, a 30-year-old Pakistan-born resident who had become a US citizen attempted to detonate the Time Square bomb. Shahzad was listed on a U.S. government travel-lookout for bringing approximately $82,500 into the US between January 1999 and April 2008. On May 3, 2010 the FBI led Joint Terrorism Task Force took over the investigation because of possible international terrorist connection; why did it take them so long? The Time Square bomb located at the tourist-crowded block at the eastern corner of 1 Astor Plaza (intersection of West 45th Street and Broadway), according to some experts could have killed thousands due to time it was set to detonate, its location, and the amount of glass which would shatter and fallen from above buildings around the area. Their was three other Pakistani , Aftab Ali Khan, Pir Kahn, and Mohammad Shafiq Rahman who had stayed pass their visa's just like the 9/11 hijackers, this is what is known as a sleeper cell. When you compile having terrorist crossing the Mexican border with Imams calling for chemical and biological weapon attacks on the US and the experts say, "Its Not If But When", do you really think the border should be porous? A five pound bag of anthrax opened at the top of a skyscraper and thrown into the wind of any of our big cities could kill hundreds of thousands of people so do you still believe the liberals that we don't need our border secured? Will it take a hundred thousands of people from New York, Atlanta, Los Angeles, or Chicago before they will secure the border? I'm afraid the answer will be yes.

Courageous Letter From Triple Amputee Veteran To President Obama

This letter was sent to me by one of the blogs visitors, I checked it out and it is authentic. In my opinion, this Wounded Worrier and Hero expresses what every true American feels; please read.

Dear President Obama,

My name is Brian Kolfage, I’m a triple amputee and retired Air Force veteran who was severely wounded on September 11, 2004 in Iraq.

I nearly died in a war that most of your colleagues supported overwhelmingly, including the two presidents who came before you. Many citizens may not agree with waging war in Iraq to free the oppressed Iraqi citizens, but it’s something that warriors like myself have no control over. I joined to serve my country and to better my life. I’ve seen things that you could never imagine, and they have made me the person I am today.

Mr. Obama, even though we have extreme opposite views, we have one thing in common, we both attended school in Hawaii. However, that’s where the similarities end. You see, as you attended your exclusive, private school, I would ride my bike to Kaimuki High School in one of the roughest areas in Hawaii. Every morning I would ride past Punahou, the exclusive private school you attended and I would notice all of the Bentleys, Maseratis, and fancy foreign cars that all the kids were dropped off in; wow it must have been extremely rough in Hawaii living that life, right? I could only imagine what it was like to have that kind of money. Fortunately for you, not many people are aware of the school that you and the upper class citizens of Hawaii attended. The tuition to attend your exclusive, private school was more than it cost me to obtain a Bachelor’s degree in Architecture from the University of Arizona. You talk a big game when it comes to financial inequality, yet I’m quite sure you have no idea what it’s truly like to have to sacrifice. You were one of the elitist children in Hawaii.

After High School, we each chose very different paths. You were able to attend America’s finest Ivy League schools, while I pursued a career in the military, in hopes of earning a degree. What we have in life as children usually helps to set the tone for how we achieve success later in life. I worked to get where I am today, while it was HANDED TO YOU….Mr. Inequality.

I volunteered to go to Iraq on both of my deployments, and the second time I begged to go even after I wasn’t selected. During that second deployment, I was ultimately placed on the team where I would lose both legs and my dominant arm. Even though many Americans were against the war in Iraq, I’ve never asked myself if it was worth it after losing 3 of my limbs.

I am frequently reminded of the many young Iraqi children who would beg me for water, food, and toys while I was stationed in Iraq. Children, who in all aspects made the poorest of poor American children look rich. You have no idea what it really means to be poor. It’s laughable that you, who would have no idea what it means to be poor would so frequently play the inequality card.

While I was in Iraq, our mission was to liberate the Iraqi citizens from a tyrant and that’s what we did. Never forget, it was your people who sent us there, like the Clintons, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi & Carl Levin. However, since the day you busted onto the scene you’ve been talking about ending the war and pulling the troops out, not understanding the blood sweat and tears that so many Americans and Iraqi’s invested. And with complete disregard for every life sacrificed, every limb lost, and every broken family, you bailed on our mission to pursue an agenda that was completely centered on your re-election in 2012. If you didn’t bail on Iraq you were worried that you may not get re-elected and that’s a fact. Just before elections on Oct 11, 2012 you said “Al Qaeda is on the run and Osama bin Laden is dead.” Look at Iraq now, they are in shambles and the Al Qaeda flag is flying freely. Clearly, you’re unfit for duty as a Commander in Chief. You put your own agenda ahead of America’s agenda, and now you have single handedly ruined and destroyed nearly everything we gained in Iraq. It clearly means nothing to you, because the only thing that you’ve personally invested in that country was a promise to bail on them. However, people like me gave limbs, friends have died, and we’ve watched families destroyed by war’s aftermath.

I’m not placing blame on you for the war, I’m placing blame on you for destroying what we’ve worked so hard to build. You’re not a leader, you’re a community organizer. A leader would have stood up regardless of the situation and put America’s agenda first and that is ensuring a secure Iraq even after 10 years of war. But, you placed Barack first, just as Robert Gates confirmed in his new book. I can’t help but think of those poor kids who I gave water and toys to 11 years ago. They’re probably 15 or 16 years old now, and I can only imagine what it’s like for them to have their nation being torn apart yet again; all because of your poor leadership qualities. Regardless of why we went to Iraq, its water under the bridge. We went there, we waged war, and we not only owed it to our KIA’s but we owed it to the citizens of Iraq. We invaded their country and turned it upside down, and you bailed on them. You bailed on our soldiers and you’ve wasted every death and every limb, it’s all for nothing. And to make matters worse you blame others for your failures.

You’re just another elitist rich thug who’s pretended to live the rough life growing up in the inner-city. You’re only worried about your own agenda and furthering your party instead of taking care of Americans. Your inability to be a leader at some of the most critical points has caused both of our wars to fail. You’ve been a joke to most of our veteran community and we have no faith in your ability to lead.

Senior Airman Ret Brian Kolfage USAF

The 4th Amendment Gone; Automobile Black Boxes

The 4th Amendment of the US Constitution reads:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

A round 96% of all new automobiles sold in the US have this new black box installed in their car which few even know they are there, if the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration get a say so, they will be required in every car on the road. These boxes have been used to evaluate car performance by car manufactures for years, they have been used on rental cars to track their cars when not returned and even help people when they are lost so what is the big problem?

The New York Times had a story which is below.

“When Timothy P. Murray crashed his government-issued Ford Crown Victoria in 2011, he was fortunate, as car accidents go. Mr. Murray, then the lieutenant governor of Massachusetts, was not seriously hurt, and he told the police he was wearing a seat belt and was not speeding.

But a different story soon emerged. Mr. Murray was driving over 100 miles an hour and was not wearing a seat belt, according to the computer in his car that tracks certain actions. He was given a $555 ticket; he later said he had fallen asleep."

Since we have watched as the current administration under President Obama's control has used the IRS, EPA, and the BLM to target people (illegally), political enemies, and groups in which he and the Liberal Democratic Party hate, what could they do with this information? Luckily for Mr. Murray he doesn't have a bad rapport with the Obama administration so he has nothing to worry about, but what if it would have been a reporter at odds with the Obama administration? A reporter often goes to areas most would avoid to do a story on gangs or drug trafficking and now the Obama administration has circumstantial evidence that the reporter is dealing drugs; do you think the Obama administration has enough main stream media people in their back pocket to push that scenario?

How about you are driving down the road and someone is tailgating you, you think they are about to crash you so you speed up to get around a slower car and get into the right lane so the tailgater can pass. A week later while opening your mail you receive a speeding ticket.

Your company is in competition with a Chinese ran company; both you and the Chinese firm know you have the better product. They hack the system (easier then you think) and find out where your kid goes to school or wife works and sends you pictures or even kidnaps them directing you not to call authorities and to drop out of the competition or something bad will happen; What would you do? 

An investigated authority (police) or political opponent hacks into your car system to listen to anything and everything you say, your strategies, your vulnerabilities to use against you in the upcoming election; remember what Nancy Pelosi said, “We must win by any means necessary.” Do you think politicians or union members wouldn’t do this? You know they will.

One more; you are a scientist on some new technologies the government likes. You have recently started dating a LEGAL alien who is here on a Student Visa; she/he is all you ever wanted. The government tells you they want your research and you refuse, immediately her/his Student Visa is revoked, the next day a government official says they can expedite giving her/him full citizenship if you turn over your research; do you think our government would do this or do you trust them?    

What about the civilian side of the house? So first, can insurance companies get this information, mark you as a habitual violator of some traffic offence and jack up your premiums even if you have never had a wreck or ticket? Can the police use it for circumstantial evidence in an investigation to investigate you for a murder which you just happened to be in the general vicinity?  Two New York courts have ruled warrants are not needed to retrieve this data from the manufacturer’s black box; where is your 4th Amendment rights, they have been removed by two judges who violated the US Constitution and your rights.

You have a stalker, he/she hacks into your car’s black box, he/she can tell where you are at any moment and if you are with anyone. They can listen to your car via car microphones and watch you on video if your car has cameras. They can discover your likes, dislikes, and fears to figure out an attack strategy, do you feel safe? The police, politicians, business rivals, and criminals will be able to know your whereabouts, who you are with, and what you are discussing at any time which violates the 4th Amendment; again I ask, do you feel safe?

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/business/black-boxes-in-cars-a-question-of-privacy.html?pagewanted=all&_r=2&http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/business/black-boxes-in-cars-a-question-of-privacy.html?pagewanted=all&_r=2&

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/business/black-boxes-in-cars-a-question-of-privacy.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

http://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0512/can-the-irs-restrict-your-travels.aspx

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/01/06/black-boxes-cars-edr/1566098/

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Automobile+Black+Boxes

http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/03/20/174827589/yes-your-new-car-has-a-black-box-wheres-the-off-switch

https://autos.yahoo.com/news/automotive-black-box-mandatory-september-1-2014-150043524.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/12/proposed-new-federal-rule-could-put-big-brother-in-your-driver-seat/

http://media.mgnetwork.com/blackbox/

Democrats Not Just Trying, but Take Our Guns Anyway Possible (Gun Confiscation)

Millionaires who have all the body guards and security they need to protect their families don’t want to let the common man protect his. I have said for a while that the government, mainly Democrats, were wanting to take our guns, some like Diane Feinstein have came right out and said it so don’t try and patronize me by saying, “No one wants your guns”. Ever since the Democratic party found out that the God fearing, Patriotic, Gun owning people will not back down and submit to them perverting and changing the US Constitution, the Democratic party along with Republican RINO’s have been out to take our guns. If you look a Ronald Reagan’s assassination attempt which was the catalyst for the “Brady Bill”, you can see their attempts. John Hinckley Jr. try to assassinate Reagan and shot President Reagan, James Brady, Thomas Delahanty, and Timothy McCarthy; immediately in a flash the Democrats came up with the “Brady Bill” which banned several type of weapons like assault weapons but a .22 revolver was used in Reagan’s assassination attempt so why go after assault weapons? The Democrats had this bill already constructed and was just waiting for something to happen to push it; the Reagan assassination attempt was the perfect catalyst. The liberals who are mostly Democrats but it’s not all conclusive, know they cannot enslave the people to create their desired utopia (a Socialistic America) without removing and ability of defiance; in short, they can’t enslave you if you can fight back. You will hear the lying liberals say, “Guns raise the crime rate”, but study by the Crime Prevention Research Center in areas who now allow the people to carry concealed weapons, the violent crime rate has dropped by 22%, but facts don’t matter to liberals.

Billionaire, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg is asking all House and Senate candidates in the 2014 midterm elections to complete a 10-part survey on issues related to firearms; why? Could this be, he wants a heads up on any candidate for office to enable him to set up any potential candidate who is pro 2^nd Amendment? Andrew Cuomo has started using the NY State Police to confiscate weapons using the NY Safe Act as a battering ram; yes you heard me correctly, New York State, from the direction of millionaire Governor Andrew Cuomo is using the NY State Police to confiscate guns from law abiding citizens; by violating HIPAA laws and forcing doctors to turn over their records. They started with the people who REGISTERED THEIR GUNS! They are going back into the records of people and if you had a conviction of any misdemeanor they are confiscating your guns, visited a physiatrist they are taking your guns, or going through a divorce and talk to someone about being stressed they are taking your guns. As I have stated for a while, Gun registration, what liberals like Obama, Biden and Bloomberg euphemistically call “a national database” just for tracking who has guns, is also a perfect tool for the later confiscation of guns unless you are in New York state and its current gun confiscation. Remember Cuomo was the one who said, “Pro-life, pro-gun conservatives ‘have no place’ in New York!” So New Yorkers don’t have a right to be in New York because a millionaire governor hates God, Guns, Conservatives and in reality Ney Yorkers.

The US Supreme Court has already ruled on this, we have a right to carry our arms. The Washington Post reports that, “the survey will ask respondents questions about their stance on issues like background checks for gun buyers, limiting magazine capacity, and passing laws restricting gun trafficking”, but anyone with have a brain knows it is only about taking your guns away which Bloomberg has donated $50 million dollars to do. They will lie, in a Texas Target store the gun control group, Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense, which is backed by Bloomberg, said Monday that its Texas chapter was told on Sunday to leave the parking lot outside a Target store in San Antonio, where it had been holding a "Stroller Jam" demonstration yet we know that just days ago, gun extremists were openly carrying guns and demonstrating in the same place,” Jamie Adams, the head of the group's Texas chapter said in a statement. There was a difference, Open Carry Texas, the pro gun group, where exercising their constitutional right to open carry with no signs or trying to hinder business unlike the Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense and their “Stroller Jam” demonstration which harasses customers with their strollers. It is the liberal ideology again, win at any cost, break the law, lie, plant stuff, cook the books, and rig the voting because otherwise, they couldn’t win anything. If the press was unbiased like it should be and reported the truth about these liberals from both sides the isle and their agenda, liberalism would be dead.    

Tom Ridge, the Homeland Security secretary under President George W. Bush, unexpectedly resigned from “Every Town for Gun Safety”, a gun control group funded by Michael R. Bloomberg citing his discomfort with some of the political work the group has been planning; if you read between the lines their actions will either be illegal or unethical which is normal operating procedures for liberals anyway. Mr. Bloomberg said his sole purpose would be work to defeat Republicans and Democrats opposed strict gun control, he wanted a private group to take on the NRA. The liberal Democrats say they are for the little guy; I am not a member of the NRA but the little guys are who make up the NRA and you have one Democrat with lots of money saying here, “the little guy doesn’t matter!” In Hartford Connecticut, state officials are turning to a “Gun Seizure Law”, it allows judges to order guns temporarily seized after police present evidence that a person is a danger to themselves or others. The 1999 law was in response to the 1998 killings of four managers at the Connecticut Lottery headquarters by a disgruntled employee with a history of psychiatric problems. It sounds good on the outside and Connecticut points out what the problem is “with a history of psychiatric problems”but yet Connecticut will not go after the real problem, they need to change the HIPPA to require mental health professionals to load names of patents into the national background data base as are felons; for a “person is a danger to themselves or others”. Make no mistake, they don’t want to solve problem, if they do solve the problem they won’t be able to take your guns. I take Diane Feinstein at her word when she said, “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright banned, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America turn them in, I would have done it”, of course this was after she said she didn’t was to banned guns. In Missouri, Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill to make law-abiding gun owners into felons. If passed, gun owners would have 90 days to turn in assault weapons and large capacity magazines or they would become a felon. Here is a clip from the bill:

4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution:

(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;

(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or

(3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.

5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony.

It’s amazing, violating the US Constitution and the ruling by the US Supreme Court seem to be second nature to Democrats, how are politicians who are trying to legislate values into our society, who themselves have no values, integrity, and are deceitful ever work; it won’t! If you want to loose all your rights then keep voting for these fabulist and you will succeed, just asked the people in New York.

Our Government Defending Illegal Aliens Instead of American Citizens

A Border Patrol union claims "active scabies and other illnesses" are present in illegal immigrant minors and agents have already contracted some of these conditions; warns there could be an outbreak across the US if action isn’t taken. The most common problem is Scabies. Scabies is a contagious skin condition caused by tiny mites called Sarcoptes scabiei. These mites burrow into the skin, then breed and lay their eggs, causing a rash and intense itchiness. Sufferers of scabies rarely know they have the condition until a number of weeks after initial infection; this means scabies infestations can spread quickly. Ronald Zermeno, the Health and Safety Director for the San Diego Border Patrol states, "Border Patrol management is aware of the scabies outbreak but continue to ignore recommendations", no one is listening. In a letter Zermeno points out an agent doing medical screening which he is not qualified to do. Zermeno on the agent said, “He observed several people with open sores and which he recorded on the questionnaire,” but “He was not told about any precautions to take such as decontamination of himself and uniform. This demonstrates that we are not properly trained to identify infectious disease and to properly respond when we suspect a disease”, President Obama and his leadership is ignoring the problem, “Management’s more concerned about processing and getting rid of them as quickly as possible than looking at decontamination,” a Border Patrol agent says. FEMA who are responsible for doing the medical screening of the immigrants before they’re transferred to California should be fired. They have released infected illegal immigrants into the general public. Zermeno told ABC 10 in San Diego that he has been placed under a gag order; now why would someone do that, maybe because of all the diseases and infections the liberals don’t want the negative news and health threat known to the public.

The Obama administration is shipping these illegals to towns without even notifying the towns. The mayor of Murrieta California defends the protesters who stopped the transport busses from coming into their town and dropping off the illegals. The mayor said, “We’re a very small town. It’s a bedroom community of about 106,000 and the air is clean and the people are beautiful. So we have every reason to expect more buses to arrive in Murrieta. Border patrol and Homeland Security has not answered any of those questions. We just anticipate more coming. So we’re really in the dark.” So what is the federal governments answer? Sources say the feds are bringing out the riot squads against the illegal immigration protesters; doesn’t this sound eerily similar to the LBM and the Clyde Bundy situation; we will force you to do what we want; you don’t have any rights! How long will our federal government keep using these tactics, until people are shot by the hired mercenaries which will be the catalyst for the next revolution? I have to say, California, you brought this on yourself by voting for all the stanch liberals you have in office in your state; have you learned your lesson yet? La Raza is an anti-American racist Spanish group who are headed to Murrieta California has started harassing and bullying the towns people; the people of the town wants the borders secured as required by law; La Raza wanys open borders and the US to collapse. If President Obama is against bullying like he says, then he should take those riot squad people and face them off against LaRaza; that won’t happen, you have to have a set and Obama doesn’t; but it gets worse. You have Border Protection Chief Gil Kerlikowske, whose official title is Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, saying the influx of illegal immigrants are not dangerous or gang members; if that is the case, why block congress taking pictures or talking to them, why put a gag order on Border Patrol agents. The experts say that ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria), you know, the ones who have decapitated up to 10,000 people in Iraq including women and children, could easily be crossing our southern border due to its porous nature; this doesn’t sound like it’s not dangerous. Do we have to have ISIS cutting off American heads before out government; both Democrat and Republican will do anything? Chief Gil Kerlikowske, if you are supposed to be protecting the boarder, you are a failure and need to be fired and replaced.

The only reason any president would let this go on is if he is trying to collapse our society; he stated he wanted to, “Fundamentally change America” which he is doing, at this pace pretty soon you will have no Constitutional, no rights, and no freedom. All liberals want to transfer the US into a Socialist States, I’ve been to in Socialist States and you don’t want that. They can come into your house and remove anyone their without stating a reason, detain them or even execute them without a trial, and many times they will torture your loved ones, including your children, to get what they want; this is what the liberals want but this is not the American way.

The Illegal Children and the Danger to America

“Send us your children”, this is the message sent to Central and South America by the liberal politicians and the Obama administration, they deny it, in the news they say “stop sending your kids” but the evidence tells us something different. The flood of children over the border was not accidental, messages were found telling parents to send their children, you might think it’s a coincidence but you must look at the facts; they started flooding over in May and June but the contract for their transportation was signed in January, did someone go to a psychic? The liberals once again are doing extreme damage to our country without thinking or purposefully.

Before anyone comes into the US they need to be screened, not just as a possible terror or criminal threat but also for a possible health threat which is not being done with these children, and it is all done under zero supervision. Besides the massive economical damage these illegals are going to cause to our nation, the criminal damage they are causing, they may also cause something much worse because you can’t see it; health damage. We could have the next pandemic start within a short time right here in the US, there are many people not allowed in the US due to a type of disease or infection they have; many have been permanently barred from entering the US; do any of these illegals have them? When you get a Visa from the US or any other country you must have your shots up to date and be screened; none of these illegals have been screened. You shouldn’t blame these illegals, they were just following the messages sent by our liberal politicians, and the Obama administration; if you came from where they did, you would want to come here too. Don’t blame the doctors and health workers for not talking to the press about the diseases they have found like tuberculoses, AIDS, Hepatitis, and many more, Obama has made it illegal for them to talk, they will be arrested; what is the Obama administration trying to cover up? What happened to freedom of speech?

Senator McCain (Republican) and several Democrats (all liberals including McCain) want to grant these children refugee status; isn’t that for political prisoners or fleeing a country at war or where you are receiving persecution because of your religious beliefs? These are the same liberals who were going to send a professional educated German couple and their kids back to Germany, who legally came to the US for actual religious persecution; so the trick is to come here illegally? Senator Pelosi opened her mouth and once again said something ignorant, how surprising. Pelosi said, “Surge of illegals immigrant children an opportunity"; yes an opportunity for American tax payers to lose more money because you, McCain, and all the other liberals who will not secure our borders. Senator McCain and Pelosi, don’t you know we have a recession with a bunch of Americans out of work; what about them? Oh, that’s right, you liberals just gave nearly 560,000 illegal aliens temporary amnesty and work permits after President Barack Obama unilaterally enacted the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program two years ago; so you took care of the illegals workers, what about the American workers? The average wage under the Obama administration for the American worker has dropped and the main reason is because of all the illegals. The liberal and of course President Obama seek $2 billion to help these illegal children yet cuts our military to a point of ineffectiveness; what about the security of the country. In every border state, illegals are bankrupting small towns, how can this be good for America; but it’s not just small towns, across the Nation, especially in California it is big towns as well.

The other part the liberals are not looking at is the increase of human trafficking, these kids are used and abuse from the time they leave their parents till they get here and many times the abuse doesn’t end there. The human trafficking across the border isn’t just Spanish, but many are oriental, especially Chinese; if you look at an Emergency Beacon which are placed along the border, it is written in English, Spanish, and Mandarin which is most common language in China. Many Chinese restaurants and factories have been busted inside the US for running Sweat Shops in manufacturing items and food services. Many will take these children from all races and turn them into prostitutes no matter their age; there are many sick people out there. These children, some as young as 9 years old, will work the rest of their lives trying to pay off their “Snake Heads”, they are in modern time slavery in the US. The question that needs to be asked is why? Why would the liberal establishment want more uneducated, lower wage class people in the United States? It always comes back to the money and change!

President Obama said he was going to "fundamentally change" this country; liberals have been doing this at a micro scale for a while; hence the reason we have went from number one in the world in education and manufacturing to no where close to the top. If you get more people citizenship that are not educated and will remain in the lower class, for the liberals and Democrats, it is a win, win; they will take more from the true working class and above and give to the lower class and none working class so they are redistributing wealth. Since the illegals aliens will not understand the destruction the liberals and Democrats will cause by being elected, the liberals and Democrats can keep pushing policies that enslave them and us to the government; liberals and Democrats gain more power. By giving the illegal aliens access to the voting booths even though they are not allowed to vote they will; this was proven in the last election yet the liberals and Democrats refuse voter ID requirements; why? This is an invasion of our country, the official number is 11.7 million illegals in our country but many oversight groups say there are as many as 50 million illegals in the US. You can't say they are wrong, we really have no idea how many their are but a little less then a quarter of you population is an invasion. If you want to save this country you need to truly secure the boarder; when you have a bus full of people show up to the boarder like these, you don't let them cross; this is following the law. Our President, Congress, and yes, even the Attorney General swears an oath to follow the US Constitution and enforce the laws of the land, if they don't they should be removed from office. Without laws you chaos and destruction which we are seeing the beginnings of it in our country; this would achieve the "fundamentally change" President Obama and the liberals want and the US would be exceptional no more; we would be just like a third world country. Is this what you want?