What is the Biggest Problem with the Department of Defense
DOD is a question that people have pondered for decades. If you step back and
take a close look, the answer will smack you in the face. Before we get
started, I retired from the military after 27 years of service and worked as a
civilian employee for the DOD until I retired, so what I say is from first-hand
knowledge.
I have seen, questioned, and been shocked at the answers and
policies, as well as the nepotism. I watched as we tested a vehicle to protect
our troops and the contract get awarded to the company because of political
affiliations instead of merit which ended us with many US military deaths; but
that senator was reelected. The Military should be the ONLY one picking the
equipment they need, not some bureaucrat interested only in reelection. If you
really want to fix this problem, the Defense budget should be set on a
percentage of our GDP. Under Democrats, it is usually 17%, Republicans 23%, so
let us make it permanently 20%, which would also help us with all the Pork
Spending from both sides. If this is not possible, the Defense Budget Bill
should be voted on by itself, with no other bills attached. Then add, if the
DOD saves money, it will not lose money the next year.
One of the Biggest Problem is the amount of non-Military
background people who are in charge of important parts of the Military. When
you talk about DOD personnel, they are three groups, Military personnel (self-explained)
DOD permanent civilian employees (full time permanent hires), DOD temp/term
employees (temp usually a DOD perm in a short term job, Term not a perm and can
be let lose at any time), and DOD contract personnel (personnel or company
contracted to fulfill a military contract.) Of the DOD permanent employees, too
many bosses who have never been in the Military are in charge and have not a
clue. As hard as I looked, I could not find the ratio of prior service people
who are now DOD civilians, where I was, it is probably 25%, which is one area
of the problem. They do know the Military and do not have the integrity, for
the most part, drilled into the heads of the Military.
How can the DOD hire people to define the battlefield, the
type of equipment needed on the battlefield, and how to achieve the battlefield
objective if they have never been in a battlefield situation, do not understand
the military thought pattern, and has never employed personnel, equipment, or
tactics to fight a battle? They have had no skin in the fight! You cannot, the
only thing that ends up happening is the Military personnel end up dead. This
is one of the biggest problems in our Department of Defense. You can have
academics coming up with possible theories at a collage, it is all right, it is
theological, but when these academics making decisions about battlefield
procedures who have ZERO experience, we the Military people pay the price with
our lives. This is compounded by these same academics not listening to the
Military leaders who have devoted their whole life to develop these tactics for
effectiveness and least risk, the number of the dead Military tells the story.
There were no politician, during the writing of the US
Constitution, who would interfere with Military operations. The politicians
would just tell the generals their mission and get out of the way. This ended
with LBJ; and the Liberal Democrats used the Rules of Engagement (ROE), which
are the rules the Military must follow set forth by the president. In Vietnam, the
ROE were used as a social justice tool during the Vietnam War causing mass
Military casualties. Even after their arrogance had caused thousands of US
Military deaths, these politicians did not stop; they just doubled down with
their interference in Military missions racking up 58,318 American Casualties. These bureaucrats directed
what the military could, and could not bomb, even though the off limit targets
were the best legitimate targets to end the Vietnam War. Vietnam was the first
time ROE were used to cripple the Military’s ability to fight, using FOBs
(forward operating bases) instead of lines, and restraining the Military’s ability
to wage war, but it would not be the last.
The first Gulf War went off like a snap; we defeated the
third strongest Military in the world in 100 hours with minimal casualties due
to the Military not being compromised by the ROE. Unfortunately, the second
Gulf War we forgot, we went back to FOBs instead of lines, but the Military was
only restrained by their 8 years of gutting from the previous administration. There
were WMDs, many of us seen them but were ordered to stay quit because they were
traced back to Kofi Annan’s son, Kofi
Annan was the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Politics interfered with
the truth again. The ROE did protected the Military, which was until President
Obama, who in known to loath the Military, won the election. From 2001
to end of 2007, there were 1,049 US Military killed in Afghanistan, which
averages to 131 troops killed under President Bush per year. From 2009 to the
end, 2016 there were 3,776 US Military killed in Afghanistan, which averages to
347 troops killed under President Obama per year. This is a 265% increase,
this, like the Vietnam War, was directly caused by President Obama’s ROE
compounded by the MASSIVE cuts done to the Military by the Obama administration,
and the administration forcing the Military to buy inferior equipment. President
Obama would not listen to any of the Military leaders because he, as most
Liberals, is a narcissistic academic who has never been in the Military and
thought he knew more than the generals with hundreds of years combined
knowledge. This ended up with over 1,727 of my sisters and brothers in arms,
not coming home to their families. If you through the icing on the cake,
President has averaged a little over 1 a month, but his ROE told the Military,
do what you have to. These are not Democrats or Republicans; these are not
conservatives or Liberals. These Americans died because of the arrogance of Liberal
civilian placed over the Military who have had no skin in the fight.
Another major problem is that we have too many civilian
employees in the DOD who have never had skin in the game. They do not have the
mindset, discipline, or integrity most Military display daily. I watched a
Military retiree, who was a supervisor, get busted and suspended (rightfully
so) for trying to hire someone illegally by the Director and Executive Director.
Then I watched the Director and Executive Director, neither have served in the
Military, who busted him, illegally hire the most unqualified person, over many
highly qualified people, into the leaving directors spot who was retiring. Before
you ask, no I was not running for this position. This person with ZERO
experience at that level or even the next level down, who also had ZERO
Military experience was picked for that exact reason. The way they promoted
this person directly violated the regulations and US Labor Laws. This hypocrisy
and illegalities I watch daily, among the non-mil civilians working in the DOD
and it is mind blowing. If you bring it up or challenge it, they will retaliate
against and black list you. You cannot stop these wrongs because they are the
ones in charge. This needs to be fixed, I’m not saying every person needs to be
Prior Military but the ones making the major decisions should have at least had
skin in the game. I wonder how many of these civilians, if vetted properly
today, would have illegal payments from DOD contractors in their pockets. I
wonder the same about our politicians, both Democrat and Republican.
Another major problem we have is with the way the military
is required to go through certain civilian companies with ZERO ability to do a
price challenge. For example, we had a 1-cylinder diesel engine on a piece of equipment,
which broke. None was in the supply system so we went local purchase, which is
legal but equipment must be identical to the Military required item. Through
the supply system, this engine was $1,800 yet I purchased it for just under
$600. I put in a price challenge, it was denied because it went through a
disability company. When I followed the tracking of the money and equipment,
the equipment came directly from where I bought it, only the paperwork went
through the disability company. We were paying them $1,200 to process paperwork
that took 10 minutes, and on average, the military bought roughly 5,000 of
these engines a year. DOD was overpaying this company by $6 million dollars a year;
I wonder which politician was involved here. Remember, this is just one company
and we deal though out the Military with hundreds of thousands of companies.
There was a project we were working, one part classified, one
part sensitive, and we were going to pay the contractor $1.6 million. I told
the person in charge, I could do it and save some money, he gave me 2/3rds of
the project, paying the contractor $600,000 for the other 1/3rd. It took me by
myself, two months to complete the 2/3rds of the project, saving $1 million
dollars. My pay for those two moths was just a spec of the million. Ask
yourself a question, “Why was the contractor charging so much?” I have done
this many times which the contractors hate, but the same contractors keep
offering me job.
Here is another. The Normal military jet fuel is JP-8; it
costs $3.73 a gallon. The Obama administration mandated the Military use BIO
fuel; it costs over $16 a gallon and damages fighter jet engines, so on top of
the 429% fuel cost raise you have the cost to fix the jets. You ask why the DOD
budget is so high; it is because of bad stewardship and decisions from
civilians that compromised our National Security. This is singly the most
costly problem we have at the DOD. Many of the DOD contract companies rip off
the DOD (and all branches of government) at every chance and we are mandated,
in many cases, to bend over and take it. We need to have a mandatory price challenge
for anything the government buys, if it has the same Form, Fit, and Function
and is cheaper, you must buy it. We also need to only by parts from the US, or
our allies. We had bought cameras from china and found out they were
transmitting information back to China, does that sound like a threat?
I can go on for days and deeper in these areas but I would
need to write a book. Please let me know what you thing.