Veterans and White Supremacy ABSURD!





An article in the New York Times by Kathleen Belew shows how ignorant and absurd our news organizations have become. She starts off her article " Veterans and White Supremacy" with reference to a Vietnam Vet who was a White Supremacist before he ever joined the military who shot and killed three people in Overland Park . Leon Hobbs is a member of a black supremacist party "The New Black Panthers" and was a Vietnam Vet so may be her next article should be about Veterans and Black Supremacy. Why doesn't she mention Major Hasan, a Muslim Supremacist who killed 13 and wounded 32 who were from what I can tell all non-Muslims. There is at lease three more incidents of Muslims in the military killing their comrades while praising Mohammad. Why does these idiotic dingle berries always point to whites as the racist (I hate all racist) but never at the Black racism, Latino Racism, Muslim racism, or any other group of racist and why do they always try to link it to the military; why, oh that's right, it's not politically correct. If we want to talk racism lets be truthful about it because I hate all racist.

The military is very good at removing all white racist it finds which I was proud to help accomplish while I was serving but it wasn't as easy to get rid of other racist people. Take a look at Major Hasan, who had over 20 complaints against him but because he was protected by political correctness, he was untouchable. The FBI knew he had connections to  Anwar al-Awlaki, but because he was protected by political correctness, he was not touched and now 13 are dead and 32 wounded but why doesn't she talk about this? This would be a better story or how President Obama stabbed the military in the back again by calling it "Work Place Violence" instead of what it was, "A Terrorist Attack", but once again this isn't politically correct.

If she really wanted to do a piece on racism we can watch it from the Attorney Generals Office, it is in full display there; oh wait, I wasn't politically correct. Why doesn't she do an article against Racism in the Senate; former Senator Robert Byrd  who led a KKK chapter. According to the FBI The New Black Panther Party is a black extremist who advocated the use of violence and guerrilla tactics to overthrow the U.S. government; they are supported by elected officials Cynthia McKinney-Georgia Congresswoman, Al Sharpton-Brooklyn Councilman, Charles Barron-Brooklyn Councilman, and believe it or not, Senator Barack Obama even marched with them at the Selma Rally. I wonder why those charges against the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation went away! Would the Justice Department have done the same thing if it were idiots out there with white sheets? I think not, they would have fried them rightfully so. Supports of the New Black Panther Party also include Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton; who is the first person to yell someone is a racist?

Cherry picking information to push your view as a reported is malpractice of your profession and shows you having no integrity. Trying to tie our military to racist is a political motivation by liberals who have malevolence toward the military and is anti-American in every way. The political correctness pushed by the liberal establishment is destroying America and its Constitution; but telling liberals this and pointing out the facts won't help, because I truly think this is their ultimate goal anyway.

Two Americas



I seen this on another blog and wanted to share it, I do agree there are two Americas.

In early January 2014, Bob Lonsberry, a Rochester talk radio personality on WHAM 1180 am said this in response to Obama's "income inequality speech" .

Two Americas

The Democrats are right, there are two Americas.
The America that works, and the America that doesn’t.
The America that contributes, and the America that doesn’t.
It’s not the haves and the haven'ts, it’s the dos and the don'ts.
Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don’t. That’s the divide in America.

It’s not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility.
It’s about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office.
It’s about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. It’s not invective, it’s truth, and it’s about time someone said it.
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago when president Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.” He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that’s not just.

That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you. Vote Democrat.
That is the philosophy that produced Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.
It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal.

The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope.
The president’s premise – that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful – seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
By and large, income variation in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibly have far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure frequently manifest themselves in personal and family income.

You choose to drop out of high school and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education.
You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course,
you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course.

My doctor makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but, our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant.
He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine.

Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth? No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes.

It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom.

The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.

The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions.

Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring equality of effort.

The simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow, so shall ye reap – is sometimes applied as, “The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society.

Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.
He and his party speak of two Americas and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other.

America is not divided by the differences in outcomes, it is divided by the differences in efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man’s success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man’s victimization.

What Obama offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He has fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That’s what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.

Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln’s maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.

Tell us your opinion.

How Do You Stop Crime in America?





I hear all these groups blaming crime, poverty, status, and situation on all these other groups yet not once will they look at the cause or acknowledge the reason (usually not politically correct) when study after study shows the root cause in these communities. You have celebrities from all these groups, most of which forget where they came from because they made it out, who could change the dynamics but they don't. You have politicians speaking about helping these groups but in reality most only want a way to get votes, money, and power. These same politicians who have warped the educational system to keeps these groups uneducated, in poverty, ill-informed, and in a modern day type of slavery do so in the hope they will never figure out the politician who says they are helping are actually the one with their boot on your throat.

I had a letter sent to me by a reader who wanted me to check into the lopsidedness of criminal by race who were in jail and the differences in sentencing. I asked them to get me the resources so I knew where their statistics were coming from, this is so I could confirm or deny their credibility; I didn't here back from them. I figured out the web site the information came from and asked the site for the references so I could confirm the numbers; once again I received nothing. When I research items, people are always ready and willing to give you their resources, even when they are from a hack site because most people don't know how to identify a hack site. When a site doesn't want to give you their resource information, it is usually a hack site and the demographics are propaganda, not factual. In this case, this is why all the references from this site at the bottom of the page was pictures and not links, you would have to hand jam them in and most people won't bother; I'm not most people. Only one link was legit out of the first six and only two had operational links; the second operational link went to a professors paper which isn't legit because a professor can write anything to match their agenda and in this case, the professors numbers didn't match the FBI's data base. The professor was from a hyper left leaning school and their paper showed their bias, I like dealing with fact so lets get started.

Much of the data this site was trying to present was in the ball park but the reasoning behind why it was happening was flawed do to hateful rhetoric which has been taught by their so called leaders. Poverty and crime work together in a vicious circle, the only way to lower it (you will never eliminate it) is to go after the route causes; many of the facts I will state will not be politically correct but they will be accurate. I do not know why the FBI didn't have the Latino stats in with the rest of the stats so I will give you just the Black and White Stats in comparison.

Race
Population
% of POP
% arrested for crimes compared to national Pop.
Arrest % compared to race POP
% Births out of Marriage
% UnEmp. Rate (True Numbers)
% High School Drop-Outs
White
227,263,600
72.4
63.3
94.3
29.1
7.7
17.0
Blacks
39,551,400
12.6
28.5
226.1
72.2
16.2
33.9

These numbers are taken strait off the FBI web site so if you have a problem with them, go there and complain; you can complain to me about my commentary. We have politicians lying to people about why there is such a gap between the amount of blacks and whites in jail and on the economic ladder. When you look at these numbers, you need to realize that the difference is not across the nation, but concentrated in the large cities. The politicians in these big cities have created the environment of economic problems and crime; look at Detroit for a good example, it was suppose to be the liberal city example for all to follow and now it is bankrupt; lets see what happened. It has been ran by the same liberal party for forty years, they are responsible and what have they accomplished? Factories left, over half the population left, crime rate increased, house value dropped by over 90%, and it became the biggest city to ever file bankruptcy, good job Democrats.

If every thing in a societal community is the same, then the percentage of crime of any particular group would be the same at 100%; as we look at the numbers above, the Black arrest percentage is 226.1% of their population. This community per capita, using the FBI numbers, has more criminals then the other communities, but why? To me two of the major factors are lack of an adequate education and out of wedlock birth rates. The black community compared to the white community has twice the out of wedlock birth rate and twice the drop-out rate, this to me is what has led to twice the unemployment due to lack of proper education and twice the people behind bars due to no good father role model and lack of adequate parenting; I do not believe it is a coincidences. The only people to blame is the leaders within that community for their problems. When you have a community, no matter white, black, or any other race who will only vote people who look like them, not only are you being racist but you are not judging a book by the content of its character, but the color of their skin.

We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.
Martin Luther King

Everyone in Detroit knew Kwame Kilpatrick was a criminal yet they elected him and then reelected him, Martin Luther King would have said, "You Reaped What you Sowed."

Martin Luther King was a very insightful man and a true leader not only within his community but throughout America as has been many other preachers; what do you think Martin Luther King would say about Jeremiah Wright? He would say he's not a preacher of God's word just as he would say about several other prominent people calling themselves preachers, doing nothing but dividing Americans to help fill their pockets; do I need to mention their names?

Every man must decide whether he will walk in the light of creative altruism or in the darkness of destructive selfishness.
Martin Luther King

Bill Cosby, Senator Allen West, Condoleezza Rice, Dr. Ben Carson, and Clarence Thomas are good role model who have tried to make it better and be a role model for the black community, but the "several other prominent people calling themselves role models" keep calling them "Uncle Tom" and worse; isn't this preaching prejudice? Many people have tried to give all in poverty a better chance for their children by doing school vouchers, this is so anyone can send their children to a better school if they are in a failing school. Now who keeps blocking this? The liberal Democrats but again I ask why? The answer is simple, they care more about the Teacher's Unions and their money then they do your kids. Remember what I said earlier that caused the problems in any community, "a lack of an adequate education" which is what vouchers will help change for the good, just look at the results why they were allowed before our current president stopped them.

The function of education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. Intelligence plus character - that is the goal of true education.
Martin Luther King

This pretty well lays it out and if you are offended by the truth, I can't help you which is what I am trying to do. Unless you take a truly unbiased look, the gap which is growing between the poverty level and middle class people will continue to grow, as it has under this president. It will continue to grow and we will not only have more people in all communities with a higher out of wedlock birth rate and drop-out rate; we will have more of our children going to jail and being buried. To answer the last questing about longer sentences; on average the black sentences are longer and it looks like a bias. When you look at the stats, more of the black inmates are repeat offenders hence the reason for the longer sentences.

All of this can change but one of the first items needs to be turning in the criminals instead of, "they're not bothering me" or "I'll take care of this my way"; this just ends up with someone dead, it may not be you this time but it will be your time sooner or later. Anonymous calls can save you and maybe one of your kids, but I know what you're thinking, "You're not from the streets, you don't understand!" You would be wrong again and if I could of changed one thing, I wished I had did things differently. I made it out but several of my friends didn't. I was one of the lucky ones, but it's too late to change your mind when your friend is dying in your arms. I am older and hopefully wiser now and realize my hotheaded days weren't that smart, I (along with some others) am surprised I wasn't taken out before I turned 25, but I still have the ghost I can't forget. If what I am telling you upsets you but saves one life, it is worth it. You are the only one who can change your community and yourself, no government handout, no honor among criminals, and especially no politician can help you achieve the American dream; the choice is yours.   

Taking Guns and Client List Any Way Possible









Many people say the government isn't coming for your guns, they wouldn't do illegal searches, and law enforcement always abide by the US Constitution; if you believe that, you are an ostrich and really need to get your head out of the sand. If you know much about gun laws, you know running illegal guns are against federal law and according to federal law, no one, elected official, military personnel, or even law enforcement is allowed to break this law. We all remember the "Fast and the Furious", where Attorney General Eric Holder illegally gave the Mexican drug lords illegal weapons which ended up in the death of three Peace Officers. Eric Holder denied knowing anything about it, testifying to Congress, until emails were found linking him to it. The real reason for the Fast and Furious was to make it seem as if we had an "Illegal Arms" problem so after John Kerry stabbed to American Citizens in the back (explained further in the reading), the UN could come in and take our guns. Even though the illegal assailant, Eric Holder, lied to congress and orchestrated this criminal act, he was never raided, faced any charges, or removed from office. I wonder if our federal and state government would give us the same courtesy or would they do illegal searches?

The first story starts out in San Diego California, the ATF came into Ares Armor and asked about some gun parts and the client list. The Ares Armor Executive Officer, Dimitrios Karras told them they could search (without a warrant) any item or building they owned, offering to give them the equipment in question to the ATF for their own testing; the Agent in Charge turned to Mr. Karras and said they only wanted the clients list which again Mr. Karras refused to give them. Sensing something awry, Mr. Karras went requesting a restraining order against the ATF from searching the stores and receiving his client list without probable cause which was granted by the judge, the ATF had no reason for their client list and served the restraining order on the ATF. Three days later the ATF violated the restraining order and raided the establishment taking their client list. My question is, what would happen to us if we violated a restraining order and who do you call when the one violating the law is the one who the one charged with upholding the law. It gets better, after Mr. Karras went public with this illegal raid, the ATF Threaten this Gun Parts Dealer for telling the public the truth; I think that is a crime too. I know what your thinking, its probably an isolated incident; the same thing happened to an Oregon Gun Store which was  Illegally Raided by Feds, and here is yet another instance of the Police Caught On Tape Raid Business without a warrant because someone over dosed not in the business, but three floors up in the building. I'm beginning to believe this is the norm for our law enforcement. I know what you are thinking; We can trust our elected officials to be honest and do what is right.

We have Liberal Senator Dianne Feinstein caught in a lie, she does want everyone's guns and this tape shows you the depth of which lying liberals will go to in order to get what they want, currently it's your gun. Here is Liberal Representative Jan Schakowsky saying Assault Weapons ban 'Just the Beginning, hand gun bands are next.' You also have Liberal California State Senator Leland Yee trying to ban more guns in California but wants no debate or discussion; only his opinion matters. Don't forget, Liberal State senator Democrat Maria Chappelle-Nadal wants to mandate parents to tell schools if they own guns. We do have some like Liberal New York Governor Cuomo who will tell you they want to confiscate and band all guns, he says confiscation could be an option, anyone, especially conservatives who disagree, Governor Cuomo says, "are not welcome in New York." Many of these law makers don't tell you the truth, they want to own guns but they do not want the "common citizens" to. They are hypocrites and elitist like Liberal Democratic Senator R.C. Soles from North Carolina, a long time Anti-Gun advocate who shoots Kyle Blackburn, an intruder breaking into his house, or Liberal Democratic Senator Donne Trotter, a stanch Anti-Gun advocate who was arrested for trying to carry a gun onto a plane. When you have our president trying to install Dr. Vivek Hallegere Murthy as US Surgeon General, an Anti-Gun zealot, you ask "what could go wrong. Dr. Vivek Hallegere Murthy wants all doctors and dentist to grill you on if you own a gun to find a ways to disqualify you as a gun owner and make it a mandatory part of your health records. I see something wrong with this, don't you? Last we have John Kerry signing the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty which if you read, gives the UN the right to seize your weapons. Did you notice few of the prime time news channels covered this?

I ask you again, do you trust your government? If you do maybe you should read the story about Randy Weaver, it will show you just how far some will go to get what they want; as Nancy Pelosi said, "By any means necessary". Please leave a comment.