Black Lives Matters, The Truth Behind the Facade.

I believe that you look at the actions that any person or group commits or condones to see their true intentions. In America our US Constitution says we can peacefully protest, what does the dictionary say about a peaceful protest and is Black Lives Matters (BLM) really just peacefully protesting?

Peacefully- free from war, strife, commotion, violence, or disorder:

Protest- an expression or declaration of objection, disapproval, or dissent, often in opposition to something a person is powerless to prevent or avoid:

Black Lives Matter says it is a unique contribution that goes beyond extrajudicial killings of Black people by police and vigilantes. In the summer of 2013, after George Zimmerman's acquittal for the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, the movement began with the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter. In August 2014, BLM members organized their first in-person national protest in the form of a "Black Lives Matter Freedom Ride" to Ferguson, Missouri after the shooting of Michael Brown. More than five hundred members descended upon Ferguson to participate in this "non-violent demonstrations."

Now here is where the media and liberals cover the lies. Trayvon Martin was a thug, he was kicked out of school three separate times for fighting, drugs, and having stolen goods. George Zimmerman was an idiotic pug, whenever you have these two type of people meet, something bad is going to happen. In my opinion, Zimmerman chased Martin but was too fat to catch the superior athletic Martin, he turned his back to walk back to his truck, Martin saw his opportunity and pounced. Martin being on top, began beating Zimmerman's head into the ground and Zimmerman defending himself by shooting Martin once. The coroner's report and all the evidence backs up what I stated but this doesn't matter because to the BLM movement, only "Black Lives Matter." If Martin had been taught respect for others and other's property he would still be alive. In Ferguson, Michael Brown was also a thug waiting trail for two assaults and strong arm robberies he had commited in the recent past; he again committed an assault and strong arm robbery minutes before his death. The news covered the several people who said the cop shot him in the back but refused the cover the others who said he was charging the cops. The coroner's report, even from the Brown's own coroner said he was running at the cop who Brown outweighed by over 100 pounds. He was high at the time of his death and due to his own violent actions he was killed. If Brown had been taught respect for others and other's property he would still be alive.

This is where we see the true face behind the facade of BLM, they say they "descended upon Ferguson to participate in non-violent demonstrations" but in reality they burned the town down to the ground; that doesn't sound "non-violent" to me. During this time two cops were shot and they celebrated;  this was the beginning of the organized shooting of the police. They didn't stop there, two suspected Grand Jury witnesses were found murdered, one next to where someone spray-painted the phrase “snitches get stitches” on the side of a building. The sad part is there is no evidence or records they ever testified; a coincident, I don't think so. A cop killed one black male justifiably and the BLM thug rioters murdered two black males; I thought Black Lives Mattered? As I have said before, when you keep yelling wolf when none is present, when a true wolf does show up, no one is going to believe you, this is what happened with Eric Garner. In my opinion from watching the video, Eric Garner was murdered by the police using an illegal choke hold, if not murdered by action, he was by not calling paramedics for seven minutes after Garner collapsed. A real wolf showed up and no one paid attention because wolf had been yelled so many times the people became desensitize. When a senator stated "All Lives Matters", BLM people went ballistic on him saying he was racist for stating "All Lives Matter", so are you staying no one but Black Lives Matter? I ask, who is acting like the real racist here? A study by Dr. Roland Fryer, a black professor at Harvard shows in the raw data, that blacks are 23.8 percent less likely to be shot at by police relative to whites. Hispanics are 8.5 percent less likely but BLM like any liberal group, don't like or care the facts.

The truth is BLM is no different than the KKK except it is a different race, both are hate groups, violent, and do not respect the law. The one difference is I haven't heard of the KKK murdering any police officers or anyone else in the last 50 years but you do have the BLM calling for it. Don't get me wrong, I hate all racist groups and BLM is a racist group. If BLM's message was going to have any legitimacy, it is gone now. The hatred for the racism coming out of BLM will unfortunately spread throughout our country causing more racial incidents then we saw in the 1960's. If we had leadership from President Obama this could be defused but instead he throws more fuel on the flames which by his actions make him look just as racist as the BLM crowd. President Obama further loses any possible credibility by stating, "Police Can 'Make the Job of Being a Cop a Lot Safer' by Admitting Their Failures." Cops do make mistakes, we all do, but this make President Obama sound like he is blaming the cops who were shot in Dallas, not the BLM lunatic that shot all White Cops stating, "he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers.” This is preaching racism and blaming whites for others failures due to their own actions? 
The truth is, no matter what race you are, if you choose to be the victim when you are not, you will become the victim from your own doing and no one else's. If you choose to ignore your surroundings and work to have a better life you will succeed on your own merit. This has been proven time and time again but the liberals want you to become the victim, not the success.

Judges Not Following the US Constitution

When liberals get into positions of power, in almost every case they will abuse this power for personal gain. The “Process Clause” of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, U.S.C. § 455, “Disqualification of justice, judge or magistrate judge” tell us when a justice must recuse themselves from a case. The Judicial Disqualification: An Analysis of Federal Law Second Edition, Federal Judicial Center 2010 clarifies this by putting a fine point on when a justice by law are required to recuse themselves. You can look it up but here are just a few situations where justices must recuse themselves; they are as follows:

If the judge was involved in the case prior to reaching the higher court from a lower court.

If the judge has been counsel for either party (defending, prosecuting, or conducting ceremonies).

If the judge was the trial judge on the case that is up for appeal.

If a judge or family member has a financial interest (owning stock or being paid royalties) or personal interest (advocate for or against) the case at hand.

These are just a couple and seem pretty common since but the reason they were written into the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was because judges were taking their personal feeling and biases to decide a case instead of the facts and merits of the case. By the US Constitution judges are to interpret the law, not make it, but today we have a massive number of liberal justices making the law. All of our laws stem from the US Constitution and when you have liberal justices, especially on the US Supreme Court who swear an oath to preserve and protect the constitution that do not believe in the constitution as law; we have a problem. When these same liberal justices refuse to recuse themselves when the US Constitution requires it, this creates tyranny and the miss use of the justice system. This one fact by itself can take every right we have as Americans away. So let’s take a look at a couple of justices.

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor

The following are all disturbing statements made by Justice Sotomayor.

"That one’s sex, race and ethnicity ought to affect the decisions one renders from the bench."

"I further accept that our experiences as women and people of color will affect our decisions,"

"Personal experiences affect the facts that judges choose to see”

"Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.

Your race, gender, nor your ethnicity should ever effect your job of judging, these are statements from a female chauvinist and racist. What is more disturbing is that she says she will only see the facts she chooses to see. So evidence and truth means nothing to her but then again, she is a liberal. Justice Sotomayor does not view the Constitution as "Settled Law". To have a Supreme Court Justice with this type of view is disturbing, but we actually have more than one, and more than one who refuse to recuse themselves when the law demands it. Justice Sotomayor has already violated her oath of office and any respectable justice would resign, but liberals are seldom ever respectable and the law don’t apply to them in their eyes. For instance, when there was a Supreme Court case on the US Boarders, Justice Sotomayor by the law was to recuse herself. For over a decade, Justice Sotomayor served as a Board Member and Vice President of the open-borders legal advocate and long-time amnesty-activist, Latino Justice. I’m pretty sure that violates the “The Judicial Disqualification: An Analysis of Federal Law” requirements, but she isn’t the only one. Is this the type of justice who is above reproach? NO!

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

The following are all disturbing statements made by Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

“You would have a huge statelessness problem if you don't consider a child born abroad a U.S. citizen.”

“Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of.”

“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in 2012.”

This shows that in Justice Ginsburg’s mind, she thinks America should take care of all the children in the world. The second statement bothers me more because what population or ethnic group is it that she doesn’t want too many of? That statement is as racist as it can get but she is a liberal so the media won’t say a thing. Her last quote is the most disturbing. We have proven to have the best Constitution of any free world to support freedom but she wouldn’t use it to draft a new one. She along with all liberal elitist would probably have all Americans turned into subjects instead of citizens. She also should have recused herself from the gay marriage case since she was an advocate for gay marriage, speaking at gay conferences and acted in favor of gay marriage. Justice Ginsburg had performed three to five gay ceremonies, one in the chambers of the Supreme Court itself. I’m pretty sure that violates the “The Judicial Disqualification: An Analysis of Federal Law” requirements just as Justice Sotomayor did but did she act respectively; no. On top of this, Justice Ginsburg just made an ass out of herself by commenting on a current presidential candidate which is taboo for a Supreme Court Justice. As a matter of fact, she was the first US Supreme Court Justice in history to do so. Was it because she was trying to pay back Bill Clinton by helping Hillary get elected for selecting her to the Supreme Court?

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan

The following are all disturbing statements made by Justice Kagan.

“And what my constitutional values are, are wholly irrelevant to the job, and so neither you nor anyone else will know what they are.”

“What my political views or my constitutional views are just doesn't matter.”

“Perhaps most important, judges will have goals. And because this is so, judges will often try to mold and steer the law in order to promote certain ethical values and achieve certain social ends. Such activity is not necessarily wrong or invalid.”

“In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism's glories than of socialism's greatness.”

To start with, Justice Kagan’s “constitutional values” are completely relevant to her job because she like all justices swore an oath to defend and protect the US Constitution. If your political views go against the constitution as Justice Kagan’s do, then you should be removed from the Supreme Court. When you have a judge trying to “mold and steer the law in order to promote certain ethical values and achieve certain social ends”, they have just violated the constitution because their job is to interpret the law, not “mold and steer the law”. The constitution is 100% about a capitalistic country, when you have justice praising socialism as great, by the US Constitution, they need to be removed. Justice Kagan had the same conflict as Ruth Bader Ginsburg on gay marriage. Justice Kagan had performed same-sex wedding ceremonies which again, under the 14th Amendment mandates she recuse herself but once again, liberal justices never follow the law.  She should have recused herself from the Obamacare Supreme court case as well since she, as solicitor general of the United States, served as the head of an office responsible for formulating the Obama administration’s legal defense of its domestic agenda priority. Is this why President Obama appointed her to the Supreme Court, to get his agenda through?

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer should have recused himself from the Wisconsin-based Johnson Controls, Inc. case because his wife had ownership of stock in a company involved in the dispute. But as all liberal including people who are to uphold the law, Justice Breyer broke the law by not recusing himself but again, he is a liberal so what do you expect.

You wonder why “We the People” don’t trust the government, just look at the liberals actions who are on our supreme court not to mention all other courts who circumvent the will of the people. Imagine what all the other liberal justices on the lower courts are doing and who they are doing it to. These liberal justices are stripping away every American’s rights and if we don’t change it, we will soon be subjects instead of citizens and know firsthand the meaning of tyranny.

Stoking Racism in America

There has been racism since the beginning of time and to some degree always will be, the problem is when our politicians purposely stokes its flames for political benefit. We can choose to force racism’s ugly head to the outside fringe of our society or choose to cultivate it, unfortunately many liberal political figures today choose the latter. Some like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have even made a business out of stoking racism. As Eric Garner’s kids said about Al Sharpton, “He is all about the money”, Erik Garner was murdered by the police (on video tape). Al’s biggest problem was Erik’s daughter was she didn’t have Al’s National Action Network emblem on the fliers she was passing out about her father’s death. The biggest problem with Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and many other race baiters like them is when everything is called racism you lose your soap box because people, even of the same race, see you for what you really are, a racist. It causes the “Cry Wolf” effect so when a real racist incident happens the people have heard you “Cry Wolf” so much, they figure it’s just another farce. The reason they do it is because it is their business, they have made millions by purposely hurting race relations because it is their way of life and income. If you take racism away from these fake men of the cloth, you take away their status and most important to them, their money.

From the time I understood racism, I had watched racism dramatically drop for about 20 years. This changed 20 years ago when the liberal political figures began supporting the stoking of the racism flame for political gain. The sad part is I had watched racism decline in this country but now I have watched racism revitalized from all races and start to rear its ugly head especially in inner city communities. What is worse is when our political leaders condone it and even participate in it trying to garner political points. When the heads of our political parties attend the funeral or sends representation for a thug who was killed committing a crime, they are condoning the criminal acts. When these same political leaders likewise refuse to send representation for a police officer who dies in the line of duty, they are condoning the murders of these brave men and women. This is not the priorities of a True American Patriot, this stokes the flames, adds insult to injury, or even leads to deaths as shown in Dallas. When these liberal politicians support known hate groups like New Black Panthers, Black Lives Matter, CAIR, and La Raza instead of giving them the deserved scrutiny and treatment they do for the KKK and Arian Nation, you have protection of prejudice hate groups that will fester.

When you have The US Attorney General Eric Holder stating, “Whites Can't Be Victims of Racial Injustice Because They Haven't Suffered Enough”, it shows just how out of touch these racist politicians are with reality and American History. When they are the highest cop in the land and make these kinds of racist statements, it majorly damages race relations in the US. The second problem with race relations is the liberal news media will never cover these type of stories because it is all about their agenda, not the truth. Mica Johnson the shooter in Dallas, a Black Lives Matter and New Black Panther supporter stated, “I want to kill white people, especially white officer.” This is the same words coming from the New Black Panthers leaders so why aren’t they lambasted by the liberal politicians and media? President Obama had a chance to be presidential for once after the Dallas shooting yet once again during a time of grief in America, he used the death of the innocent to try and gain political points and push his gun agenda. Hears a heads up, guns didn’t kill these cops, taught racial hatred did. These murders in Dallas and the incitement for the murder done in the past by the New Black Panthers shows how the liberal agenda is not uniting but dividing our country. I don’t care what race you are, murdering the innocent is always evil and when you murder someone just because of their race, the evil has just been compounded. The US Attorney General Loretta Lynch made an empty statement after the Dallas Shooting, “Turn to each other, not against each other.” How can anyone “Turn to each other” when the liberal agenda is driving a race wedge between the American people?

We as Americans have watched the liberals in our government of all races refuse to prosecute specific races and political affiliations while targeting ones with whom they disagree; do you really think this will make us “turn to each other?” The New Black Panthers were caught on video threatening people at the voting booth, President Obama and US Attorney General Eric Holder refused to prosecute even though the evidence was overwhelming. Ask yourself, would they have acted the same if it would have been the KKK threatening minorities? The Dallas shooting is no different, why has the US Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, opening a civil rights violations investigation in Louisiana but not in Dallas? In my opinion you need to follow the evidence. This may be a bad cop in Louisiana which may or may not be race related, yet there is no doubt the people were targeted for their race in Dallas. Where’s the civil rights violations investigation Mrs. Lynch? It has been the Obama Administrations policy throughout his tenure as his record shows, that whites do not deserve the same protection, in other words the Dallas cops are the wrong race? Black Lives Matter’s movement has from the beginning been a violent group yet the liberals will never hold them accountable for their criminal acts and now we have five dead police officers and the president wants to again blame guns.

There are several reasons why our country is becoming more violent and they all come from liberal policies. Liberals policies say the schools can’t discipline there students anymore, in many cases that is the only place they will learn wrong from right. Liberal policies say you can’t tell the truth because it must be politically correct, this one item is causing major damage to our society than any other. Liberal policies says schools must teach our country is a bad colonial country, why don’t they take pride in our country? Liberal policies is what is sending all our jobs to other countries and members of the unions who are losing these jobs still vote for the liberals. Liberal policies is what has doubled our national debt in eight years. Liberal policies is what has decimated our military to the point only 67% is functional. Liberal policies says to truth about criminal identities must be covered up, you can’t profile a criminal because you may offend them. Liberal policies gives us gun free zones so the criminals know where to hunt their next victim without danger. Liberal policies says lets blame the gun in Orlando and Dallas instead of a Murderous Religion or hateful teaching which call for jihad and/or the murder of whites. Liberal policies is what allows illegal alien gangs in our country causing 60% of the crime according to the FBI, raping and murdering thousands of Americans every year. Liberal policies allow child rapist to operate due to Plan Parenthood not reporting, as required by law, and under the of consent pregnancy. Liberal policies is what lets Hillary Clinton get away with a criminal act which has landed others, who has done much less, in jail. Liberal policies which tell minorities to hate white people because whites are raised with a silver spoon in their hands. And of course my favorite, liberal policies teach everything is the white man’s fault even if you are the one who knowingly broke the law.

The truth is anyone can make it out of poverty if they work, Ben Carson made it out of the Detroit ghettos and I grew up with nothing and made it out of one of the poorest areas in America. But the liberals have for several decades told minorities they are “OWED” entitlements for their abuse and enslavement. What the liberals don’t tell them is there were slaves from all races even white and most African slaves were sold by Africans. It is sad they won’t teach students the truth about slavery, that in 1651, the first slave owner Anthony Johnson had four white slaves and one black, Mr. Johnson was black. The reason they don’t tell you this is because the truth doesn’t matter to liberals, only their agenda. They want to make every minority hate them, “White Slave Master” which hasn’t existed in over 150 years. Martin Luther King didn’t want his people collecting entitlements, he wanted them to be treated equal in the work community. Liberals just want to divide Americans which is what they have been doing ever since President Lyndon B. Johnson made a nasty statement I won’t repeat. Why does anyone want liberals running anything?