Allahu Akbar: Liberals Enabling Paris Type Attacks in America



Are all Muslims bad? As I have said many times no, but the estimated 15% to 25% who are Extremist and the estimated 50% to 60% who support the Extremist view in the world are not a friend of America, any free society, or peaceful Muslims. Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party made up less than 15% of the German community population but were the catalyst for over 85 million people's death. At the beginning of WWII Germany's population was 67 million which 15% would make 10,050,000. The 15% of the world 1.7 billion Muslim population is 255 million. If just over 10 million can be the cause of 67 million deaths, isn't it plausible that 255 million could be the cause of death for over 1.7 billion people? Yes.

Is France is a free nation? A French Feminist group targeted a "Women of Islam Conference" in France, their weapon; bare breasts and a smile. The Islamist quickly targeted them, their weapons, throwing them to the ground, punching, and stomping the ladies until they were almost dead. In a free society where protesting is a way of life, this was a definite overreaction, this wasn't done when the Muslims protested but this is what you should expected, and what is condoned by Islam. Once France (or any country) allowed un-vetted Muslim refugees into their country and DID NOT make the Muslim community integrate with the French people, in just a few moments in time their freedoms began to be wiped away. France is no longer a Free Country! But how did this happen?

At first the Liberal leaders running France gave up small areas to appease the Islamic community who were crying discrimination, in short order the Islamist had created a sub society within France. This sub society exploded, the Islamist took more and more, implemented Sharia Law which circumvented and violated French Law. The French government's Liberal leaders once again ignored and didn't enforce the law of the land to appease the Islamic community and turned a blind eye to these violations. Embolden by the ease of violating the law, the Islamist pushed the envelope even more making Muslim only zones which took away the French peoples freedoms. Once again, the Liberal leaders in the French government to appease the Islamic community turned a blind eye. During this time the Muslim community was using its Mosques to hide and store weapons for Jihad terrorist attacks. It wasn't until the Islamic community started launching their terrorist attacks against the French citizens from their Mosques that the French Government took any actions. The truth about the Islamic community had been pointed out for years but the Liberals in the government with their political correctness did nothing, enabling these terrorist to murder French citizens in cold blood. Doesn't this sound familiar to what is going on in America?

Now it is the liking to a civil war with the Islamist yelling the only reason for this is everyone is islamophobic. I'm not try to pick on France, the same is happening all through Europe, including England, and even in America. After many attacks and threats, Angola and for the most part Norway have banned Muslims from their country. In Norway, Muslims made up 2.3% of their population but once they were banned and deported, violent crime dropped 30%, a coincidence, I don't think so! In America we are following the same path as Europe because as in Europe, our Liberal politicians, both Democrat and Republican are always trying to appease these groups. Our Liberal leaders ignore the US Constitution and American Law to appease the Islamist as well as other groups. If anyone opposes allowing these violations, they are called racist or Islamophobic instead of making these groups obey the law.

We are following the same Liberal path of Europe and today the same types of attacks are happening in America and our Liberal leaders ignore it and push their own agenda. The Ohio attacker was an ISIS radicalized Somalian refugee who ran over people with his car and used a knife to attack others injuring 10; what did the liberals say? Senator Tim Kaine (Hillary's VP pick) said, "Deeply saddened by the senseless act of gun violence." Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee stated, "Today is yet another was a sad day in our country because of a senseless shooting…" The only gun used was by the cop to stop the attack but as Liberal Senator Eleanor Holmes Norton stated, “The evidence isn’t a concern", at least not for Liberals.  As the standard tactic of liberal, many came out calling the Police Officer a racist for shooting the ISIS linked terrorist because the cop was white and the terrorist was a Black Muslim. How could anyone vote, let alone elect these three? Ask yourself, what is happening in America? To put the icing on the cake, the Mosque attended by the attacker already had three people, Nuradin Abdi, Iyman Faris, and Christopher Paul convicted on terrorism charges so how could this be a lone wolf as the Liberals in media are trying to say?

In America, Dearborn Michigan is the largest Muslim community and has stoned Christians for being in the wrong place where they didn't belong, a public street. The Christians who were stoned in Dearborn were arrested by the Dearborn Police for “breaching the peace” even though they never raised a hand even while being attacked. The City of Dearborn and their police have been documented as serial violator of all non-Muslim people's rights. In Dearborn and other American Muslim communities' there has been many reports of "Honor Killings", but when the Muslims are the police and coroner, or are controlling them, we will never know the true number of these murders.

First, let's look at some data. All intelligence communities around the world say 15% to 25% of Muslims are Radical which from the 1.7 billion Muslims would be 255 to 425 million Muslim terrorist. If you look at what Liberal President Obama who says it is only 0.1% which would be 1.7 million; who do you believe, a Liberal or intelligence? State side attacks since the 9/11 attack, under President Bush there was 35 Americans killed by Islamic radicals on US soil. Compared this to the 119 under President Obama, a 240% increase. President Obama had the same effect on our war in Afghanistan, under President Bush we had 983 military deaths. Afghanistan war deaths under President Obama 2,441 deaths, 248% increase. Which one do you truly believe was not only protecting Americans at home but also American troops on the battlefield from the terrorist? In France these Islamic Terrorist kill Charles Hebdo for drawing a cartoon, they tried the same in the US by targeting Pamela Geller but found Americans armed and the Islamic Terrorist were killed. Dearborn is not our only large Muslim community, but it is some of the other Muslim sites in America that concern me.

The FBI had a list up on their web site until it mysteriously was taken off after President Obama took office which showed 35 Muslim Terrorist training camps in the US. The FBI was also forced under the corrupt Obama administration to remove the CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) document from their web site for political correctness which classified CAIR as a terrorist group. Our Liberal politicians refuse to tell you the "The Truth about Terrorist Attacks on American Soil." They won't tell you about the "Muslim Judges in US not Protecting non-Muslims and Our Freedoms." We need the News Media and our elected officials to tell us the truth and show "Islamic Terrorism Spelled Out." We as Americans need to be completely informed about "The Problem Which Caused the Terrorist Problem in America." "The True War on Women" is Islam yet few if any Liberals will come out and say it, by the way, Islam is the main contributor to the Clinton Foundation. "Is America Safe? ISIS, Unsecured Borders/Illegals, Gutting the Military" has made our country the most vulnerable it has ever been and it's due to Liberals and political correctness. Our elected officials need to put our country and its citizens before anyone else and no, just because you cross the border you are not an American. If you really want to see how stupid Liberals are, just look at Liberal California's attempt to regulate cow farts; no I'm not kidding.

Please comment.

To Obey the Law or Not to Obey the Law?




We are a country of laws so when the law doesn’t suit a group, should they be allowed to ignore it even if it puts the rest of America in danger? There is a dangerous precedence trying to be set for those who break America’s laws at all levels in and out of the government.

“All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency.” George Washington

“The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly.” Abraham Lincoln

The clearest way to show what the rule of law means to us in everyday life is to recall what has happened when there is no rule of law. Dwight D. Eisenhower

I think our 1st president and Founding Father had it right as did Abraham Lincoln and even Dwight D. Eisenhower. When our country began all men were created equally but today our problem lies in a John Lescroart quote.

“The essence of fascism is to make laws forbidding everything and then enforce them selectively against your enemies.” John Lescroart

If you do not want your freedoms and liberties taken away, you need to ask yourself a series of questions and be honest. Should a person be allowed to choose which law to obey or disobey? To have a nation of laws that govern you know the answer would have to be no. If a person breaks the law, no matter their status or position, they should be punished the same by the law. The law is there to give all of America’s citizens equal and due process of the law, when they break it or are a victim. We don’t want people out there raping people because they don’t like that law or a political official covering it. Unfortunately this is happening. Let’s look further.

Should law enforcement officers be allowed to choose which law to obey, disobey, or enforce, and should they be exempt from it? I back law enforcement in most every case but not all cases. In Law Enforcement, many unions will not allow Bad Cops to be fired or will not allow the Police Chief, Sherriff, or other in leadership position to state why they were fired or resigned. When you leave dangerous people on the streets, be a violent felon, or a bad cop, bad things are going to happen given time. The law and regulations in New York said a choke hold was illegal for use by all police departments. New York Police Officer Daniel Pantaleo had been cited several times for excessive use of force yet nothing was done. On July 17, 2014 bad things got worse, Eric Garner was literally murdered by Daniel Pantaleo by using an illegal choke hold incorrectly. A choke hold, though illegal for New York police, is only to be held for a max of 10 seconds, Officer Pantaleo held it for 15 to 19 seconds. At the minimum the charges should have been manslaughter but to me it was murder. What was his punishment? Nothing! With leaders like Bill de Blasio, bad cops will never be charged. What I don’t understand is the ones being murdered it will are the ones putting these people in office.

Should our elected officials be allowed to choose which law to obey or disobey? No, yet we just watched a presidential candidate violate numerous National Security Laws and nothing was done. Was it because of their money or political standing? I work for the Federal Government and if I did what she did, I would be in jail for a minimum of 10 years if not for life. All laws are to be administer as seen in Lady Justice, evenly and with a blind fold so if you are a politician, rich, or a pauper, the law is distributed equally. Article 7 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) states that "All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law." Hillary is just one example but both the Democrats and Republicans have a cesspool of corrupt, dishonest, and criminal politicians; why do you think the people elected Donald Trump. They should be punished equally, if not more harsh because they are the leaders and should set the example.

Should states and cities be allowed to choose which law to obey or disobey? When you allow this you have many Eric Garners every year with no punishment. You also have many Kathryn Steinles. Kathryn Steinle was shot and killed by an illegal alien, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez in San Francisco, California on July 1, 2015. Mr. Sanchez had been deported a minimum of 5 times and had been convicted of 7 violent felonies and had 52 other arrests. San Francisco officials transported Sanchez to San Francisco County Jail on March 26, 2015, for an outstanding drug warrant. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had issued a detainer for Sanchez requesting that he be kept in custody, he was facing another felony charge for selling marijuana. San Francisco did not honor the federal detainer being a Sanctuary City and this Illegal Alien felon was released on April 15, 2015. On July 1, 2015 this Illegal Alien felon, illegally in possession of a firearm murdered Kathryn Steinle. Jim Steinle would still have a daughter and Kathryn Steinle would still be alive if San Francisco would have followed the law. Every city official who approved of this policy should be held as accomplices. Immigration policies are set and controlled by the US Congress, not US cities or even states.

In America all the people, law enforcement, elected officials, states, and cities should have to obey the law, as Lincoln said if there is a bad law enforce it so it will be repealed. If you refuse to enforce it, soon instead of the law abiding society, you will have a chaotic one; the beginning of which is similar to what we see in America today. When the law is not enforced equally or does not exist for people of wealth or status, soon vigilante justice will rear its ugly head.

Please tell me what you think.

Liberals Showing Their True Colors




Liberals have always told you that they are here for the people, to protect the people from the bullies, people who intimidate, and commit violence against the people. Before I can go any further we need to look up the definition and what constitute a bully.

Bully-a blustering, quarrelsome, overbearing, violent, intimidating, domineering, arrogant person who habitually badgers and intimidates smaller or weaker people.

Now that we know what a “Bully” is, let’s see the reactions from the election where the Liberal’s candidate, Hillary Clinton lost; what was the reaction of the “Liberals”? If they hate “Bullies” as they say then why is Liberal Matt Maloney acting like one? The Liberal CEO of Grubhub, Matt Maloney, tells pro-Trump employees to resign. So if you work for Grubhub you are only to vote for who Matt Maloney tells you. You will have all your freedoms removed which is the true intent of all Liberal Politicians; to remove American’s Constitutional Rights. What Matt Maloney did is illegal but once again, Liberals only care about the law when it suites them. Mark Cuban tells his Trump supporting employees to quit which just like Matt Maloney, is illegal but once again, he is a Liberal; the law doesn’t matter. What about the Liberal Educators?

Milpitas High School Principal Phil Morales put on leave for using anti-Trump profanity during walkout. The Liberal Bias in our Media and Bullying in Liberal owned work places seems to extend to our liberal ran public schools. Salt Lake City, the Granite School District have Liberal students Bullying Trump students using their race, gender or ethnicity to select; isn’t that what Liberals say they are against, Discrimination and Bullying. Woodside California, a Peninsula high school student's was viciously attacked in a Race Centered Hate Crime for supporting Trump by Liberal Spanish students. So I guess the Liberal Haters also profile; I thought they were against that. What about the Liberal ran Universities?

University of Michigan, both a vigil and anti-Trump rally were held Wednesday night in protest of President-elect Donald Trump’s unexpected win by students, faculty and staff. New York City, Barnard, a women’s liberal arts college has given permission to cancel classes and is offering students counseling for mental stress after Trumps win. That’s a waste of tax payer’s money. Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, Lehigh University professors protest against Trump's presidential win. So another tax payer university ran by Liberals throw a temper tantrum when their candidate loses. I wonder if they would have allowed the same if Hillary would have won.

When has this ever happened before? Never, as I have said many times, Liberals are destroying our country. With Liberals controlling education, they are destroying our children’s ability to cope and survive in the real world when situations happen. Do you know why most Liberal professors teaching their Liberal theology in our collages have never been or used their theology in the “Real World? It is because they would lose the shirt off their back; they couldn’t survive with it in the real world. This being said, why are we allowing them to teach our children; I would rather have someone who has done it and succeeded teaching my kids, wouldn’t you? Let’s see what main stream Liberals really say and do.

Nationwide in 2015, female full-time workers made only 80 cents for every dollar earned by men. Many females at the Trump organization actually make more than their male counterparts and women make up 43% of the work force with more women than men holding executive positions. So what about the Liberal Clinton Foundation? At the Clinton Foundation, Males Earn 38% More Than Women. Let’s go bigger, the most liberal work environment in the world is Hollywood so how does Actresses and Actors pay compare? I’ll let you be the judge.

Top 5 Male Actors
  1. Dwayne Johnson, $64.5 M. 
  2.  Jackie Chan, $61 M.
  3. Matt Damon, $55 M.
  4. Tom Cruise, $53 M. 
  5.  Johnny Depp, $48 M.
Average $56.3 M

Top 5 Female Actors
  1. Jennifer Lawrence, $46 M.
  2. Melissa McCarthy, $33 M.
  3. Scarlett Johansson, $25 M.
  4. Jennifer Aniston, $21 M.
  5. Fan Bingbing, $17 M
Average $28.4 M

So let me get this correct, the most liberally controlled place on earth with all its equality pay the top 5 female Actresses 49.6% less than the top 5 male Actors. Do you really think the Liberal establishment is for female equality? You have California Liberals throwing a fit and demanding to succeed from the US after Trump was elected. When other states made similar statements after Obama was elected they were called racist, I guess this means the Liberals in California and everywhere else are racist. Liberals are supposed to be non-violent. In Portland, Oregon, people were burning an effigy of the President-elect Donald Trump, if this would have been done to President-elect Obama, it too would have been called racist. I guess Liberals are racist once again. Liberal Hillary Supporters Burn American Flag, Riot, and threaten to assassinate Trump after losing the election. Black Lives Matter Supporters Inciting Riots in White Communities, here is more of that Liberal Racism. Wait, I thought BLM was a peaceful organization or at least that is what the Liberal politicians and press says. Liberal Black mob beats white trump supporter, another liberal racist act, you got to be kidding. To put the icing on the cake, Harry Reid came out and in liberal fashion blamed Trump for all the violence because he won the election. Does that make any since?