There are too many areas to go into in an effort to show the problem we are running into in our society do to the growing lack of ethics and morals so I picked one that all true Americans can get behind, protecting our kids against pedophiles. First, what is the definition of a pedophile? As an adjective it is an adult who is sexually attracted to young children; as a noun it is an adult who is sexually active with young children. Children is anyone 17 years of age or younger. I am old school so if it was up to me, every pedophile would have an automatic life sentence without a chance of parole. Every year fifty eight thousand US children are ordered into the unprotected custody of their identified sexually abusive parent or guardian; this doesn't count the ones who are sexually abused away from the home. I have always been for the protection of our children but I cannot say that is the same for many of our politicians, judges, schools, or even our media.
Prop 35 in California passed by a landslide, it is an anti-human trafficking, proposition, and makes it illegal for convicted sex offenders to have anonymous online identity. The law forces sex offenders to notify law enforcement every time they adopt a new online identity, which could allow websites to selectively restrict their comments. Guess who is defending them, the liberal ACLU; stating, “When the government starts gathering online profiles for one class of people, we all need to worry about the precedent it sets.” This shouldn't come as a surprise, the ACLU has not defended liberties or the protection of people for a long time. The ACLU will defended North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBA) whose website incited Charles Jaynes, 25, to molestation and murder Jeffrey Curley, 10, on Oct. 1, 1997. NAMBA is all about raping and molesting kids but the ACLU decided to defend them anyway; maybe they have members within NAMBA or just leaving their options open. Either way, they should never receive tax payers dollars.
You have politicians who try to do the right thing, take Democratic Governor Jay Nixon of Missouri. He veto HB 301, going against his own party. The bill that would have weakened sex offender laws.
Senator Don Benton and Representative Jan Angel from Washington state tried to get harder punishments for child rapist after 13 year old Alycia Nipp, was raped and murdered at the hands of a convicted Level III sex offender. They were blocked by Senator Debbie Regala, Democrat-Tacoma, upheld by fellow Democrats and Democratic Lieutenant Governor Brad Owen.
California Democratic Congress Representative Jackie Speier introduced a bill, SB 1172, which would protect pedophiles. The Republicans attempted to add an amendment specifying “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation” but the amendment was defeated by Democrats. Representative Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., stated that all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law. California is already know for protecting pedophile teachers.
Martha Robertson Democrat from New York to accept fundraiser from self confessing child molester. She didn't care, she just wanted the money as do most politicians from both parties.
The leader of the University of Texas-Pan American’s chapter of the Young Democrats Billy Wayne Johnson was arrested for indecency with an 8-year-old child, according to Action 4 News. Why is he still the leader of the Young Democrats?
I used mostly Democrats above because they seem to be caught more often then the Republicans, by the voting records the Democrats block more legislation that would protect our children then the Republicans as well. When I was looking I found on the national Democratic site, this moderator who doesn't check facts and was just spreading propaganda; this is what is wrong today.
I found pedophilia being defended at every turn by Democrats but not so much by Republicans and uncle Ted (Kennedy) left a pregnant girl in a car to die. When our politicians from both parties and their minions promote false rhetoric, it means they are either guilty of what they accuse the other party of or they cannot defend their stance on the topics so they misdirect.
We have the same problem in our schools at all levels. A professor at DePaul University in Chicago, Elizabeth Kelly, defends the sexual predators of children instead of the victims. In Rochester New York, Twenty-two teachers at an upstate Rochester New York public school wrote letters to a judge supporting a colleague who sexually assaulted an 8-year-old boy. The Michigan Education Association (MEA) Teacher Union is going to arbitration to try to force the West Branch-Rose City school district to pay a former teacher who was convicted of molesting a student a $10,000 severance buyout. The whole school system has went from protecting our kids to preaching agendas and protecting the pedophiles. No wonder we have went from 14th in the world in 2010 to 36th in the world in 2013. We need to get back to teaching our kids, not indoctrinating.
We know when it comes to protecting our kids, the judicial system will always protect them, or will they. In Montana, District Judge G. Todd Baugh sentenced a teacher who raped a child to a 30-Day Sentence. In New York, Prosecutors wanted 7 years for each of the 48 felony child rape counts admitted to by Andrew Goodman. He plead guilty which should have added up to 336 years but Justice Martin Murphy sentenced him to just two years. You ask, can it get worse, yes. Pennsylvania Pedophile Judge Mark Ciavarella Jr. was convicted of trafficking 4,000 children for inmates to have sex within the prison system. He was sentenced to 28 years but what about the Warden and prison guards; they had to know.
The media is just as bad; instead of doing what the media should do and finding out the facts, many times what they believe and report comes down to their feelings and political position void of any and all facts. Barbra Walters defends pedophile Woody Allen of being a child molester, no matter what the facts are even when put in her face by her own View partners, her personal feelings for her friend voids any facts or truth. The Denver Post editorial page editor Curtis Hubbard defends child pedophiles in Colorado. Like or hate Bill O’Reilly he is a strong advocate for protecting the kids and when these two journalist met, Bill put Hubbard who claims life-time probation is strong punishment in his place.
Our politicians, judges, schools, or even our media has caused our society to stop protecting the kids and has promoted protecting the offenders instead of the victims. Churches was once where any kid could go and be protected, even though 85% of churches are still that way, a growing number are not. We all know about the Prominent Priest Benedict Groeschel defended child molesting priest, he did later apologize but that is not good enough. The Blessed Sacrament Church Catholic Church in St. Paul Minnesota blamed the mother for not protecting her boys from child molesting priest, the congregation, as they should have been, were outraged. Other religions flat out condone pedophilia, the Islam prophet had a bride of 9 years old, in their religion when you get married, you consummate the marriage that night.
But in our society, if something meets our agenda, we ignore the effects it will have for our own physical and monetary greed. Amazon was selling a self-published book defending pedophiles called a Child-lover's Code of Conduct" by Philip R. Greaves II, they did finally remove it but only after being threatened with a boycott. Other parties don't care, Many in the liberal environmentalist movement adore their shooting star Vera Scroggins. They ignore or condone her history of advocating incest and pedophilia but will defend her to the death if anyone disparages her with these facts; don't they have kids or are they in on it?
It is strange how agendas can change your view of guilt even when we are talking about protecting our children. If I was an 18 year old male and forced a 14 year old female to have sex with me, I would (rightly so) be convicted of rape, branded a pedophile, and put in jail. When an 18 year old forces a 14 year old to have sex its rape; unless the 18 year old is gay then it is the persecution of gays by the victim's family especially if it's a lesbian. I don't care if you are male or female, I don't care your race, I don't care your political party, and I don't care your sexual orientation; if I as a heterosexual male would be convicted of rape, branded a pedophile, and put in jail, you as a lesbian should be treated equal under the law for committing the same violation.If not, this is known as special rights which is against our Constitution; are we all not suppose to be treated and penalized the same?
The history of unions in America started with the National Labor Union (NLU) in 1866, the main reason for unions at their foundation was for reasonable working hours, a livable wage, safer working conditions, and the end of child labor. When labor unions started, you were not required to join but most did because it was free, there were no dues, and their leadership was all-voluntary without pay. In the unions when they started, an employer had to have a true reason to fire someone but if it were valid, they would be fired. The unions were there to help the good, hardworking, and honest employee who gave his boss a fair days work for a fair days pay. I do not think there is anyone who could complain or dislike the original reason and stance for the foundation of unions in America. You need to realize as well, there were no labor laws or federal laws protecting the workers like we have today and unions had nothing to do with politics by party definition. What have unions developed into today compared to their original purpose in the beginning?
As I stated above, unions were initially started to get companies to have reasonable working hours, a livable wage, safety, and to end child labor. The reason (most) unions are dyeing is they are no longer for the honesty, integrity, and protection of the good worker; they are for protecting any worker, even if committing criminal acts, intimidation, bullying, and blackmail. In the beginning, an employer had to have a true reason to fire someone but if it were valid, they would be fired, now you cannot fire a union member with a valid reason because all the union wants is their money. In Minnesota, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) wanted workers fired because they were not members paying dues and would not pay service fees. Wait, “And wouldn’t pay service fees”, service fees are fees paid to a union so non-union people can work. Isn’t this called discrimination; it is called extortion. If you watch TV you could have seen Steven Crowder assaulted at union protest in Michigan, Michigan Union destroys tent, cut tent lines with people inside, or even an African American Man beaten by SEIU Thugs in St Louis while they yell racist remarks at him; what party is pro-union and condones these actions? The scary part is who was in charge of the voting machines in Nevada during the last election where Senator Harry Reid went from being down by double digits the day before the election to winning in a landslide? SEIU. Well at least teacher unions are for protecting our kids; think again.
In the beginning, an employer would fire someone for a valid reason and in the school system they error on the side of caution, if you had a inkling of hurting a child, you would be fired, now it’s almost impossible to fire a teacher who is a union member, even if the molest a child. In New York City, if you catch a teacher who is a child molester in the United Federation of Teachers (UFT) teachers union, you cannot fire them. They will be sent to a “Rubber Room”, still draw their pay, and the taxpayers are stuck with the bill, but for the union it is still OK, they gets their dues. You might think this is an anomaly but in all the teachers unions I checked, it seems to be the standard. In Michigan, the Michigan Education Association (MEA) teachers union is fighting to get a convicted child molester teacher a severance package worth thousands; for what, molesting our children, he should be hung. The California Teachers Association (CTA) teachers union pushed politicians to kill an Anti-Pedophile bill. Why you might ask, California does have the highest number of documented pedophiles in the nation and I am sure many pay dues in this unions, the unions do not want them to lose their jobs, they will not get their dues. The union does not care about the kids, only money and power, just ask Bob Chanin from the biggest teachers union; the National Education Association (NEA). He will tell you it is not because we care about children; it is because we want power and money; at least he is honest. Teacher Unions members have gotten away from protecting and teaching our children, now they protecting the pedophiles and give them a target rich environment to prey on our children in the public school system. Now you know the reason liberals keep stopping educational vouchers, if they allowed kids to go to better private schools, first, these kids would learn the truth instead of being indoctrinated, second, the unions would lose dues; remember what Bob Chanin stated, it is not about the kids, only money and power.
The third leg of this stool is with the largest unions, the MOB has taken an interest because of the revenue ability. When the largest unions have obvious MOB ties, which are documented by the FBI, why would anyone want to be a member? Remember the reason for unions when they were started in America, “reasonable working hours, a livable wage, safety, and to end child labor.” Remember the membership requirements union officer pay, “you were not required to join, there were no dues, and their leadership was all-voluntary without pay.” Remember who were members of the unions, “good, hardworking, and honest employee who gave his boss a fair days work for a fair days pay.” Now what do we see today, extortion, protecting pedophiles, MOB affiliations, violent attacks, destruction of private property by union members, racist attacks if that person disagrees with the union, and massive dues allowing Union Leadership to living in luxury. A few years back, several large unions tried to get a bill passed to show them how the union members voted in elections; luckily, they failed. The VW plant in Tennessee rejected the United Auto Workers Union (UAW) so now the UAW is challenging their loss with the National Labor Relations Board (NLBR). The UAW wants the NLBR to allow the UAW to force its way into the non-union VW plant no matter how the workers voted; I thought unions were for the workers?
Why are unions dying? Unions are dying because unions are no longer for the American worker or their values. The true American worker has to pick up the slack of those who do not pull their own load because the unions have made it so the non-producing workers cannot be fired! The true American worker who teach want an atmosphere where they can protect our children, not watch them be open game for pedophile teachers. Finally, the true American worker is starting to wake up. There are good unions out there, but most, especially large unions, do not care about you, your children, your community, or our nation; they only care about money, power, and oh yes, their dues.
Legislation and regulations have gone too far in this country and we are loosing our freedom day by day. A wise man once said, "If you throw a frog into a bucket of boiling water it will jump out, but if you put a frog in a bucket of cold water and slowly turn up the heat, the frog will stay there and be cooked alive before it realizes what is happening." The ladder is what is happening to us in the US, when you have the government shutting down the motivation of our youth. When an 11 year old cupcake business because she does not have a separate kitchen in her house. Telling a girl, she can't sell mistletoe to raise money for her braces then directed to beg instead. When you tell a 4-year old, he cannot sell lemonade for 25¢ a cup because he does not have a vender’s license. This is just a few with kids but it goes on with adults as well. When a Pennsylvania town’s fines its citizens a $1,000-a-day for feeding the birds, I think the legislation and regulations have gone excessively far. These may seem like small fries but it gets much worse and the liberals are destroying jobs due to slowly removing our freedoms with their policies.
The Coal Industry when President Clinton took office to the time he left had a drop of 37% of all coal jobs due to regulations his administration implemented. Under G. W. Bush, it rose about 14% but since President Obama has taken over, it has dropped 7% and by his own words, he wants the coal industry gone. This will be a loss of 1.65 million American jobs. Of the top ten coal producing states, three have been in financial trouble and voted for Mr. Obama; your liberal politicians knew he was going to hurt you, the people of your state, your state revenue, and the state’s economy but they did not care, they only care for their agenda; not you. If your state does not produce coal, I am sure these federal regulations are hurting you somewhere else but as for you Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Colorado, you will now have to deal with the 1.65 million jobs lost accounting for $132 billion in taxable revenue and burdened with all the unemployment and welfare add-ons. Illinois, you did not just shoot yourself in the foot but the head; this is what voting liberal does for you; it bankrupts your state, your cities, and your people due to unsustainable spending; just ask California (close to bankruptcy) and Detroit. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says Obamacare will push 2 million workers out of labor market, I wonder why we are not recovering. By the way, if you calculate the unemployment rate with the actual true numbers, our unemployment rate is around 17%; yes, they lied to us again. The timber industry has lost 40, 000 jobs thanks to the mostly liberals Democrats and the liberal regulations. The north east fishing industry have already loss another 40,000 jobs due to these regulations put into place by this administration and these liberal politicians; oh wait, you keep voting for these Democratic and Republican liberals so you have no right to complain. Use your brain and think.
Maybe you should vote for the non-liberal Democrats or Republicans who are trying to create jobs instead of a group of liberal Democrats and Republicans who spend what they don't have, who just want to tax and regulate you more; what a concept. Depending on whose numbers you use (I like the CBO), this administrations implementation of far left liberal policies has cost us over 25 million jobs. According to the CBO, it will cost us 50-70 million more jobs or reduction in working hours. What was these politician’s answers to shorter work hours due to their policies, "Shorter working weeks for all will help to create a fairer economy” or “it will give you more time at home with your family." What they do not see (or do they) is it will make you loose 25% of your pay or you will have to work two jobs to make enough to survive, this will keep you away from home more.
The truth is most politicians, especially liberal politicians, Democrat or Republican are crooks. In the state of California, you have a train project that will not help a soul but bleed $1 Billion dollars from federal taxpayers (Pork Spending) and more from California taxpayers later when it is transferred over in a few years. Guess what, it just happens Diane Feinstein's husband got the contract; amazing. Is not this at the minimum a conflict of interest? The liberal sponsors of minimum wage hike bill don't pay their own interns; I think we call that being hypocritical. AFSCME reports using thousands in taxpayer money to organize unions; liberals love unions and I know there are good and bad unions but taxpayers should not be footing a bill to organize any unions; I wonder how this got through congress. To top it off, National Security Adviser Susan Rice admitted she has no regrets over misleading the American public about the 2012 Benghazi terror attacks (right before the elections); she lied about the deaths of four American heroes so that President Obama could win the election; in Nancy Pelosi’s words, “By any means necessary”. I ran across a video of Judge Jeanine that should concern you about our power grid. Maybe instead of trains and bridges to nowhere costing Billions, we should fix our aging infrastructure. It would create jobs (just like the Keystone Pipeline) and help our country. Maybe they should relook at the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) signed by a liberal president. We could bring back previous US jobs sent to other countries by President Clinton when he signed it in 1994; you may like him, but this, along with removing tariffs is one thing he did that really hurt our people and the country.
What do you want from your country? As for those who have put their lives on the line for our defense, we now find out that while China and Russia is building up their militaries, President Obama and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is bringing ours down to below WWII levels. These cuts make up 50% of the Sequester, which the military currently only makes up 17% of the federal budget. Entitlements from both appropriated and non-appropriated funds make up over 65% of our expenditures and now we see these cuts to the military are to give out more entitlements according to the CBO. Which should they be cutting? It is the liberal Democrats attacking the military again, what a surprise; the only cuts being made in this time of massive spending by President Obama and the Democrats has been to the military, not one dollar has been reduced from entitlements. Ever since President Obama has taken over you have seen a very disturbing pattern of targeting. The military as shown above is always a target of the liberals but so are any military leaders who disagree with President Obama’s military objectives. President Obama is forcing out military leaders who refuse to promise to fire on US civilians; does this make you feel safe?
A filmmaker is targeted (who also directed Schindler’s List) for making an anti-Obama film “Obama 2016” (link to film on my site). Dinesh D'Souza donated more money then allowed to a candidate; it wouldn’t bother me so much except a large list of Democratic donors who have done the same thing with higher donations amounts are easily found but the government and Attorney General’s Office has refused to prosecute them (Can you say double standard?) Many conservative groups are still targeted by the IRS because they disagree with President Obama. I do not care if you are filing for non-profit from the left or the right but no administration, Democrat or Republican should be able to use the IRS, NSA, EPA, or any other government group to target their political enemies. This has been going on in the Obama Administration from day one, not only this but the president and Attorney General from day one have ignored the US Constitution; when Attorney General Eric Holder was questioned on how the president had the constitutional basis authority to use executive orders over the legislative branch (Congress), he could not explain. For your information and Eric Holder’s, executive orders only have authority in the executive branch, in other words, President Obama and Eric Holder know they are violating the US Constitution. The Democrats and Republicans in the legislative branch are either knowingly violating the US Constitution in unison with President Obama and Eric Holder or are too cowardly to stand up to them, maybe being afraid of being targeted. Eric Holder even told the state Attorney Generals that they did not have to follow the laws or Constitution in which they disagree. While we cut our military daily under this president, over a $100 Billion dollars was given to green energy companies. These companies donated $100 of million dollars to President Obama and the Democrats then immediately 80% of them went bankrupt; sounds like money laundering. I am sure all administrations are guilt of assigning people to “Ambassador” positions for their donations, but I have never seen such an open pay off and embezzlement of taxpayer’s money in my entire life so what oath did the president and attorney general take.
The Presidential Oath of Office
The oath to be taken by the president on first entering office is specified in Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.
I (Name) do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic that I will bear truth faith and allegiance to the same that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion and I well and faithfully perform the duty of the office on which I am about to enter so help me God.
No matter Democrat or Republican, Conservative or Liberal, President Obama and Eric Holder have not abided by their oath of office and have split this country into like no other two people in history. They are purposely letting Islamic terrorist threats into the US, and refusing to enforce laws on political and racial grounds, and we wonder why our nation is so divided. VP Joe Biden referring to voter ID requirements to stop voter fraud as hatred and racially motivated is a flat out lie. My state has voter ID and every race, ethnic group, gender, and sexual orientation is there voting; what it does stop is voter fraud. Why would the liberals not want to stop voter fraud (Nancy Pelosi again said, “Win by any means necessary”)? I think you should also have your fingerprint scanned with all the polling places linked so you can tell when someone when people vote several times and charge them with voter fraud. So what can be done?
You have Congressman Dave Camp trying to pass a bill that if anyone in the IRS or other agencies target and take official actions against people for political reasons, they will be terminated. This is a good first step, watch the vote and you will see the elected officials from both parties who don’t care for America or “We the People”, they will vote no. These are the ones you need to get rid of by voting them out of office. If you don't, soon we will have no rights.
As I have said before, if you look at history and the military, every time Democrats become president they belittle, berate, diminish, and gut the military mostly to get to those who would never stand and defend our country because in all honesty I don't think most democrats would ever defend our country mainly because in the Senate, the House, and the Presidency they don't. Of the last few presidents, the only two who refused to even give two or three years in the military was President Obama and President Clinton, president Clinton managed to stay in college for nine years to avoid the draft; I'm not a real fan of President G. W. Bush but at lease he went into the Guard.
Under Republican presidents, our military decent pay raises to keep up with the cost of living which they don't receive from Democrats. At the end of 2008, military commissaries reported military personnel qualified, applied for, and received $31.1 M in food stamps; at the end of 2013 the amount has raised to $103.6 M in food stamps, a 333% raise; does this sound like the right way to go? And now the Obama administration is wanting to close all Military Commissaries.
The Military commissary isn't the only benefit targeted, retired military pay for TriCare and receive appointments and treatment at military TriCare Service Centers, well that was until our president cut TriCare Service Centers so on 1 April, the retire military who's contract with the military promised this medical care are out on their butts; Thanks Mr. President for holding up the promises to our retired and wounded veterans. Do you think it can get worse; with our bias media, of course it can.
One thing that is burnt into my mind is the daily body counts the news (agree or disagree) plastered on the TV every night. I didn't have a problem even when President Bush left office and they pointed out that we had lost 575 troops under his tenor. Where are the reports now? Under President Obama's Rules of Engagement (rule set by the Commander and Chief) our military has been set up to die and enabled by the press. In 7 years President Bush lost and average of 82.1 troops a year; under President Obama we have lost 1540 troops, an average of 308 troops a year and we hear nothing from the news. President Obama has a 267.8% higher death rate then President Bush due to his Rules of Engagement and you hear nothing from the media; why? This shows two things; the news doesn't care about reporting the news unless it matches their politics. The main stream media is using what our Founding Fathers set up to be a Tool to Expose the Truth, as a political weapon for pushing the liberal agenda through; the truth, ethics, and integrity doesn't matter to the media anymore. Liberals hate the military so now that a liberal president is in office; who cares how many military dies! Its just like when a politician gets in trouble, if it's a Republican politician the media will repeat the story over and over ensuing you know they were a Republican referring to it many time during the story but when a Democratic politician is in trouble the won't say their party and will kill it as soon as possible. Freedom of press doesn't mean the freedom to mislead and use disinformation for political gains.
Our military should be honored and lifted up; not have their benefits and pay cut every chance the liberals get, especially not when you turn around and give it to people, who most of which wouldn't sacrifice anything for this country. Calvin Coolidge said it best.
"The nation which forgets its defenders will be itself forgotten." Calvin Coolidge