Loosing Our Freedoms, What is Said is not What is Happening

Our great nation is founded on the Constitution, it is where all our freedoms are derived; it tells us that even though we have a Christian or Atheist, farmer or a miner, factory worker or an actor, we all have been given the ability to succeed with hard work and to follow our hearts to be all these if we choose. It tells us basically, we are a melting pot and even if you are a Christian, Atheist, or any other label we want to use, that you must respect the right of all others and you are not allowed to be prejudice when selecting people for jobs, promotions, collage acceptance, or political views yet every day we see it and it is destroying our nation.  

The First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

If you read our founding fathers writings you will find that all of them where Christians, not all of the same order or denomination but believed is God and Jesus. They had seen persecution for their beliefs and wanted to give any other religious group or even nonreligious the ability to believe how they saw fit as long as they melted into the pot we know as America. The freedom of speech was given so that no elected official or citizen could say they didn't know when confronted with a person or group who did not agree; it was a way to publically try to come to an agreement and even confront our government when perceived doing illegal or immoral acts. The freedom of the press was given not to help any politicians, political party, or activist group but to hold them accountable and cover all politicians, political party, activist group, and any other news with unbiased reporting for the rest of the citizens know the honest truth. The First Amendment has almost been completely destroyed!

First there is not a "Separation of Church and State" from our founding fathers; they wanted to make sure there wasn't a "State Founded Church" like the "Church of England" who was responsible for the persecution and murder of many English citizens, even Christians because it was the only recognized religion by the monarchy. Our founding fathers even with their differing views of Christianity, wanted our nation to be founded on God and Jesus, but they wanted to make sure that never again would an event such as "The Salem Witch Trials", where people were murdered just by being pointed out by a religious official as being a witch; many of these people were innocent but pointed out due to political reason. Today, I see Christians being attacked from all sides,  just as this 8 year old boy was told the Bible was inappropriate to bring to school but yet Plan Parenthood is allowed which is inappropriate for Christians. I use this point because of the great contrast between the two groups. The Constitution states that on religion that you shall not "prohibiting the free exercise thereof" but it is seen daily from the liberal side of the camp. One is Pro-Life the other Pro-Choice, most Christians say its a life and are sadden when an abortion happens but they don't say as New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, "You are not welcomed here" and I'm sure if it was in his power he would band any Pro-Life people from being hired by the city of New York and that is discrimination; think about it, what if he had said no minorities, gays, or disabled are welcomed here, there would have been an out cry like never heard from the media but the media no longer looks out for the small, only the politicians with their view and the special interest groups, which no matter how often they falsify results will never get true scrutiny because they are "prim donnas" or the "elite" in their eyes. Freedom of the press has become freedom of the press to lie and disparage anyone who doesn't believe as they do, and twists what is happening to get better ratings. It kind of reminds me of Rita Skeeter is a reporter for the Daily Prophet and a correspondent for the Witch Weekly in Harry Potter, refusing to tell the complete truth or twisting it for certain politicians benefits; Ben Franklin would turn over in his grave.

Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Before I say a word, lets see what our founding fathers said and compare it to our current elected officials.

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them." George Mason

"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them." -- Thoughts On Defensive War, 1775 - Thomas Paine

Can you say Chicago and LA?

"Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence … from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of honor with all that's good." George Washington First President of the United States

Elected Officials:

Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D) New York, "...we could tax them [firearms] out of existence."(Washington Post)

Diane Feinstein (D) California, "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them 'Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in,' I would have done it." (60 Minutes, CBS)

Major Robert Odell Owens (D) New York, "My bill...establishes a 6-month grace period for the turning in of handguns." (Congressional Record)

I could go on for hours but just these three show many elected officials who don't care about our right or upholding the US Constitution; they should be removed. Before we leave here is a section of the law enforced in Germany in 1938; we all know what the end result was.

NAZI LAW (Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons, 11 Nov 1938, German Minister of the Interior) "Those now possessing weapons and ammunition are at once to turn them over to the local police authority. Firearms and ammunition found in a Jew's possession will be forfeited to the government without compensation Whoever willfully or negligently violates the provisions will be punished with imprisonment and a fine."

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Can you say NSA? I have no problem with the government having to terrorist or even possible terrorist until they are allowed to track any type of data on any and all non-terrorist. When they start classifying groups like the NRA, Boy Scouts, and others for political reasons as terrorist, there is a problem especially when we still have at a minimum 35 Islamic Terrorist Training camps in the US; I think their resources could be better used getting rid of them. If these camps ever erupt, where would you be if Diane Feinstein got her way; DEAD!

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

What is our elected officials doing?

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Can you say EPA, Obamacare, and many others?

Passed by Congress March 4, 1794. Ratified February 7, 1795.
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

All these terrorist and illegal people filing suites in court, its not Constitutional.

Passed by Congress January 31, 1865. Ratified December 6, 1865.
Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Making the working people pay for the lazy is slavery in my eye; what about yours?

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.

Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

All elected officials who are circumventing the US Constitution need to be removed from office immediately. 

Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned...

Didn't they just cut the retired militaries pensions? Yes so they violated the constitution again and at the cost of the ones who protect us.

Passed by Congress February 26, 1869. Ratified February 3, 1870. Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude--
Section 2.

I remember the Congress trying to prevent the military stationed over seas votes from counting for political reasons. The military does serve and quite well so why are we reelecting the ones who tried to do this?

We have problems, the symbiotic relationship between the media and our politicians is one thing destroying America, the content attack on the Constitution by elected offices who are swore to protect it is another, and the constant attack by are elected officials to remove all the freedoms we have is the third; so why are most of us just watching? A Pennsylvania town wants to charge $1000 dollar a day fine for a bird feeder, you have
New York Govenor Andrew Cuomo's administration of targeting conservative groups, and you have a president saying if Congress doesn't do what I want, I'll just sign an executive order; can you say regulation nation? This is not what the founding fathers wanted, what we are being told is not what is happening. The most transparent government isn't, this administration tout income equality but its policies have made the gap larger. Maybe it is time to get back to the constitution; our Founding Fathers did know best.

Muslim Judges in US not Protecting non-Muslims and Our Freedoms

I am not saying I believe in what this atheist group did but if you are going to protect our 1st Amendment Freedom of Speech, you can not pick and choose. I hate that our supreme court says that anyone can burning our American Flag, which so many has died, but this is freedom of speech.

The atheists in this parade wore religious icons such as the Pope as zombies; Ernest Perce had worn a “zombie Muhammad” costume and proclaimed that he was the Prophet Muhammad raised when he was attacked by a Muslim stating he was defending Islam, the man pulled Mr. Perce’s beard off so he could identify him while choking him. Mr. Perce has video of him attacked, which is not very good, but the audio tells the story. In this case is District Judge Mark Martin, who has lived in many Muslim countries and is self confessed as being a Muslim, prejudiced his view because of his Muslim and in my opinion violated the law. The defendant sited the "Religion Desecration Law" which is followed under Sharia Law but its only a violation if you desecrate the Muslim religion, you can do what ever you want to all other religions. Judge Mark Martin brought a Quran to court and told Ernest Perce, “I think our forefathers intended to use the First Amendment so we can speak with our mind, not to p_ _ _ off other people and cultures which is what you did” while citing Sharia Law and what would happen to him in a Muslim country.

At the minimum, it the man who attacked Mr. Perce should be found guilty of simple assault. Instead of doing what the law said, Judge Mark Martin scolded Mr. Perce for offending Islam, called him a doofus and accused him of “using the First Amendment” to madden Muslims, and he dismissed charges against the Muslim defendant. You have some questions here you need to ask.

Why did the Muslim man want to identify him? My thoughts is for retaliation by him or some other Muslim who is offended; this MO has happened in the US before.

Why was Judge Mark Martin allowed to use Sharia Law to dismiss charges instead of following US law? My thoughts, political correctness; he should be removed from the bench and congress needs to pass a law directing that only US law can be used or referenced in the US court system.

Why has no one removed this Judge, not for his beliefs, but for using them to allow a fellow Muslim to assault people who insult this “Peaceful Religion”? The above covers this but if it keep up, I'm am sure we will see the American People take the law into their own hands instead of letting crooked, bias, judges and lawyers; this wouldn't be good but what other recourse would they have?

The truth is we have many liberal judges and lawyers who do not follow the law or our Constitution and they should be removed. What the liberals don't understand is currently they are taking conservatives rights, but once they are done they will turn on their base which is the poor liberals.

Terrorism in America Since 11 September 2001

Do not let anyone (especially our news media and politicians) lie to you about the threat of terrorism on our own soil.  From 9/11 to 2008, the FBI and other agencies have reported stopping 50 home grown Muslim extremist terrorist plots; considering we have at a minimum 35 home grown Muslim extremist terrorist training camps as pointed out in
"Muslims and Jihadist Training Camps in America."  The FBI and other agencies can only do what our elected officials let them do and fear of retaliation will make many groups think twice about attacking us on our home soil again as shown by this relatively small number of plots. When they do not fear retaliation, these home grown Jihadist will attack us on our own soil as happened at Ft Hood on 5 November 2009; many of you will be saying "He's just picking on the Democrats" which you would be wrong, I dislike both main parties but I will point out the facts. During President Bush's term their were eight years, 11 Muslim extremist terrorist plots for an average of 1.38 per year. The FBI released stats only go to 2010 but in the first two years of President Obama's administration with complete control of the House and Senate, how many Muslim extremist terrorist plots do you think the FBI has found? If you look at the FBI.gov site, you will find that 2009 and 2010 combined had 13 Muslim extremist terrorist plots for an average of 6.5 a year. This is an increase of 472%, but why?

It might have something to do with the massive increased surveillance of US citizens for political reasons instead of our enemies abroad and their contacts here in America. We have criminal illegal people hear who should have deported (like President Obama's uncle who is associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist group) but we allow them to stay instead. It could have something to do with the US Justice Department and the liberal progressive judges reading foreign and home grown terrorist who have committed terrorist act on US soil their Miranda Rights before the FBI or any other agency who is trying to protect us can get any information out of them about any terror cells or others involved. Counting the home grown Muslim extremist terrorist plots which has increased by 472%, the al Qaeda’s and al Qaeda affiliated Muslim extremist terrorist plots have went up massively under the first two years of President Obam. I truly believe the FBI is trying to keep us safe, but it is like having a body guard who isn't allowed to carry a gun or look at anyone, sooner or later our luck is going to run out.

You need to remember Fort Hood, where U.S. Army major Nidal Malik Hasan, and psychiatrist who took an oath to save lives but yelled Allahu Akbar (Jihadist phrase for Allah is great) than opened fire murdering 13 people and wounding more than 30 in 2009. There were many complaints filed against him before this happened but political correctness and the liberal progressive Democratic and Republican politicians prevented anyone from taking action. These same liberal progressive Democratic and Republican politicians are great at giving all the entitlements we can't afford out for votes, but they suck at protecting the American people. So the next time you vote think about how your vote may lead to your Mother, Father, Sister, Brother, Daughter, or Son ends up dead or wounded or 569% safer. Don't blame the FBI or any other agency, you can only blame yourself if this happens if you voted for the liberal progressive politicians; sorry, you may not like it but this is the cold hard truth. By the way, the 13 people murdered and over 30 plus wounding were slapped in the face again when these same liberal progressive politicians who for political reasons refuse to call this an act of terror.

Terrorist Training Camps in America-Georgia

I was asked by a reader, "How can this be possible?"; after they read, "Muslims and Jihadist Training Camps in America". The truth is because our government isn't protecting it's citizens or country, our politicians cares more about political correctness and saying anything they can to be reelected; protecting the lives of Americans will never be important to these politicians, just ask the family of the four dead Americans from Benghazi. This will be the first article trying to give a better look into some of these training camps and to show just how derelict our elected officials are of their swore constitutional duties.

In Georgia, there are two terrorist training camps identified by the FBI in Franklin and Wayne Counties known as "Muslims of America (MOA)". Sheilk Mubarak Gilani is the founder of Muslims of America and he was one of the founders of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, a known terrorist group the FBI has been following since 1983. When interviewed, Terrorism Expert Steven Emerson quotes the FBI as referring to Muslims of America and Sheilk Mubarak Gilani as "A Ticking Time Bomb". A video produced by Jamaat ul-Fuqra for his followers shows you how to highjack cars, kill people, and make IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices); when he was confronted, Sheilk Mubarak Gilani said, "every Muslim has the right to defend themselves". How is "learning how to highjack cars and making IEDs defending yourself, these are offensive weapons. What defense are they going to initiate by using offensive weapons? Is this for defending themselves or defending their religion or freedom of speech in America against their religion?  Will our bought politicians kowtow to them to prevent violence in America? I guess you should be told the FBI has linked this group to a minimum 13 murders and 16 firebombing; feel any safer?

The real question you need to ask about MOA is, "What links if any to terrorist do they have?" I have already pointed out the connection to Jamaat ul-Fuqra but they are linked to Council on American–Islamic Relations (CAIR) as well, both are FBI identified terrorist groups with connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, an internationally known terrorist group.

During the Iraq war, the Muslim Brotherhood was responsible for many American citizens being beheaded, burnt and/or hung from bridges, this is a common practice of the Muslim Brotherhood and part of their overall ideology. If you have been watching what the Muslim Brotherhood has been doing in Egypt, you should know this will be the same plan they will have for the US. The Muslim Brotherhood is also partners with Hamas and Hezbollah which of course is an arm of Al Qaeda; so why are they allowed to make terrorist training camps in America? What we are saying here is, We have Al Qaeda terrorist training camps in the US and a Federal Judge, U.S. District Judge Jorge A. Solis confirmed CAIR is Hamas Terrorists. What is even more disturbing then this is at least 54 Members of Congress are aiding, working with, taking money from and acting as a front for CAIR; I am very syndic toward both Democrats and Republicans but I was shocked when I looked up and added their political party to the name of the politicians; there is definitely a pattern here. If you have voted these people out of office you have done America a service, if you haven't, you need to. I did mark this as Georgia but this is the list of elected officials who supports terrorist in our own back yard; they are as follows:

Raul Grijalva-(D)-Arizona, Lois Capps-(D)-California, Sam Farr-(D)-California, Bob Filner-(D)-California, Barbara Lee-(D)-California, Loretta Sanchez-(D)-California, Pete Stark-(D)-California, Michael Honda-(D)-California, Lynn Woolsey-(D)-California, Jackie Speier-(D)-California, Diane Watson-(D)-California, George Miller-(D)-California, Jim Himes-(D)-Connecticut, Andre Carson-(D)-Indiana, Bruce Braley-(D)-Iowa, John Yarmuth-(D)-Kentucky, Elijah Cummings-(D)-Maryland, Donna Edwards-(D)-Maryland, Michael Capuano-(D)-Massachusetts, William Delahunt-(D)-Massachusetts, Jim McGovern-(D)-Massachusetts, John Tierney-(D)-Massachusetts, John Olver-(D)-Massachusetts, Stephen Lynch-(D)-Massachusetts, John Conyers-(D)-Michigan, John Dingell-(D)-Michigan, Carolyn Kilpatrick-(D)-Michigan, Keith Ellison-(D)-Minnesota, Betty McCollum-(D)-Minnesota, James Oberstar-(D)-Minnesota, Donald Payne-(D)-New Jersey, Rush Holt-(D)-New Jersey, Bill Pascrell-(D)-New Jersey, Yvette Clarke-(D)-New York, Maurice Hinchey-(D)-New York, Paul Tonko-(D)-New York, Eric Massa-(D)-New York, David Price-(D)-North Carolina, Mary Jo Kilroy-(D)-Ohio, Marcy Kaptur-(D)-Ohio, Earl Blumenauer-(D)-Oregon, Peter DeFazio-(D)-Oregon, Chaka Fattah-(D)-Pennsylvania, Joe Sestak-(D)-Pennsylvania, Peter Welch-(D)-Vermont, Jim Moran-(D)-Virginia, Jim McDermott-(D)-Washington, Adam Smith-(D)-Washington, Jay Inslee-(D)-Washington, Brian Baird-(D)-Washington, Nick Rahall-(D)-West Virginia, Tammy Baldwin-(D)-Wisconsin, Gwen Moore-(D)-Wisconsin, Glenn Nye-(D)-Virginia.

It is up to you what you do but your way of life, your life, and your children's lives may depend on it.

Connecticut Elected Attack Gun Owners Instead of the Problem

Connecticut gun owners are now required to register their guns and ammo, this because of a law pasted and if they don't, they are felons. This sounds familiar (Gun Control by Felony). As I said before, this is not solving the problem, it's just a way for liberal leftist to take peoples guns but just for the benefit of a doubt, lets see if anything in this new and in my opinion UN-Constitutional law (Senate Bill No. 1160-Public Act No. 13-3) Would this law have prevented the Sand Hook Shooting?

Section 1- nothing here would have prevented the Sand Hook Shooting.
Section 2- nothing here would have prevented the Sand Hook Shooting mainly because criminals don't follow the law. It also wants Social Security Numbers for people transferring weapons (can anyone say identity theft), to buy ammunition you must supply identification number (Social Security Number) and the name, address and date of birth, " a person issued an ammunition certificate under this section shall be confidential and shall not be disclosed, except (1) such information may be disclosed to law enforcement officials acting in the performance of their duties, including, but not limited to, employees of the United States Probation Office acting in the performance of their duties, (2) the Commissioner of Emergency Services and Public Protection may disclose such information to the extent necessary to comply with a request made pursuant to section 14 of this act for verification that such certificate is still valid and has not been suspended or revoked, and (3) such information may be disclosed to the Commissioner of Mental Health and Addiction Services to carry out the provisions of subsection (c) of section 17a-500 of the general statutes, as amended by this act." You need to look at this closely, it really says you information will not be confidential but they will know where to go and what you have when they come to confiscate it and once again, none of this would have stopped the Sandy Hook shooting. The Connecticut legislature want $35 dollars for each ammunition certificate so in short, they want to make a profit from tax revenue off these poor dead victims, speak about the lowest of the low.

You really need to check out what it says about health care, it is so convoluted it sounds like if you go for any treatment of any kind (emergency room for a cut, a dentist, your family doctor), if any person working there find out you have a gun and don't like guns, they can request it be taken away without any due process; and again, this would not have stopped the Sandy Hook shooting.  The 99 pages of this document is written so the average American cannot understand it, it is written so any government or medical person can take your guns/ammo, and it is written so any violated is a felony and they can permanently take all your weapons and ammo. If you don't believe me the, link is above, go check it out for yourself oh, and by the way, very little if any of what I read would have stopped the Sandy Hook shooting.

This is nothing but a feel good pile of crap by liberal politicians who are making money off this tragedy. If you are a weapons company in Connecticut, you need to leave for a friendlier, safer state; if you live in Connecticut and own weapons, you need to vote these weasels who are looking for an easy way to take your weapons out of office and rescind this law; and if you truly care about the people and especially the children in your state, you need to find the root cause of the problem instead of putting lipstick on a pig. Making every violations a felony is disingenuous at the lease but in truth it is 100% un-American. I wonder, how many criminals do you think was in that line to register their weapons? Zero, it was only law abiding citizens and I'm sure you're proud of that.

The Press and Politics Endangering America Again

Once again our politicians are using the media to pervert the truth for political gain; can you guess what the gain is they are trying to get? The article which is raising so much backlash toward The New York Times contradicts what all video, American witnesses, and the facts show about the Benghazi attack but The New York Times states, "Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam." What is the purpose of this complete lack of journalistic truth; once again proving you can't believe what The New York Times tells you. Why would "The New York Times" soil their reputation even worse then it already is; what political agenda could make it worth while?

First let's put something to rest, the Benghazi attack was a terrorist attack as all the following links will show even the last link from the, you guessed it, "The New York Times".

The New York Times article from 2012 starts, "Militants, firing guns and rocket-propelled grenades, attack the main compound, moving on multiple entrances at once. The main entrance is protected by three armed and four unarmed Libyan guards. No more than seven Americans are in the compound, including three civilians and four who have guns. Mr. Stevens is alone in the main building, according to guards interviewed later. The militants enter the compound, backed by truck-mounted artillery." Is there any civilian people other then terrorist who aren't civilian that would have "rocket-propelled grenades" and "truck-mounted artillery"? No, of course not, so why would they be flat out lying now about what went on in Benghazi?

The truth is the liberal progressive "The New York Times" helps any and liberal progressive politicians and promote this agenda no matter how much it hurts the US and its people. The NYT believes in electing these politicians by any means necessary even if they have to rewrite history as they are trying to do currently to Benghazi. The only reason they would do this is because the collapse of the US economy is close and if it collapses the liberal progressive establishment can user in their socialistic society putting us all under tyranny. 

The only person who would need to be vindicated for their lack of action and leadership before Benghazi and the death of our ambassador would be Hillary Clinton. She is the one who derelict her duty and responsibility for Benghazi costing four Americans their lives, she was the one who let the false stories about a upset mob when she was watching it live and knew it was a perfectly executed terrorist attack, and she was the one who said, "what difference does it make"; ask the four Americans families that question. My deductions are that the NYT and other media outlets are going to have to make Benghazi disappear if Hillary has any chance of becoming the first women president. I hope the American people remember the truth about Benghazi because if Hilary becomes president, the US will be lost and damaged for a very long time, if not destroyed completely; all the liberal progressives want to do is destroy the constitution say they can take any and all your rights, including your freedom and enslave you.