Two Americas

I seen this on another blog and wanted to share it, I do agree there are two Americas.

In early January 2014, Bob Lonsberry, a Rochester talk radio personality on WHAM 1180 am said this in response to Obama's "income inequality speech" .

Two Americas

The Democrats are right, there are two Americas.
The America that works, and the America that doesn’t.
The America that contributes, and the America that doesn’t.
It’s not the haves and the haven'ts, it’s the dos and the don'ts.
Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don’t. That’s the divide in America.

It’s not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility.
It’s about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office.
It’s about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. It’s not invective, it’s truth, and it’s about time someone said it.
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago when president Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.” He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that’s not just.

That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you. Vote Democrat.
That is the philosophy that produced Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.
It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal.

The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope.
The president’s premise – that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful – seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
By and large, income variation in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibly have far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure frequently manifest themselves in personal and family income.

You choose to drop out of high school and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education.
You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course,
you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course.

My doctor makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but, our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant.
He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine.

Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth? No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes.

It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom.

The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.

The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions.

Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring equality of effort.

The simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow, so shall ye reap – is sometimes applied as, “The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society.

Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.
He and his party speak of two Americas and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other.

America is not divided by the differences in outcomes, it is divided by the differences in efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man’s success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man’s victimization.

What Obama offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He has fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That’s what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.

Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln’s maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.

Tell us your opinion.

How Do You Stop Crime in America?

I hear all these groups blaming crime, poverty, status, and situation on all these other groups yet not once will they look at the cause or acknowledge the reason (usually not politically correct) when study after study shows the root cause in these communities. You have celebrities from all these groups, most of which forget where they came from because they made it out, who could change the dynamics but they don't. You have politicians speaking about helping these groups but in reality most only want a way to get votes, money, and power. These same politicians who have warped the educational system to keeps these groups uneducated, in poverty, ill-informed, and in a modern day type of slavery do so in the hope they will never figure out the politician who says they are helping are actually the one with their boot on your throat.

I had a letter sent to me by a reader who wanted me to check into the lopsidedness of criminal by race who were in jail and the differences in sentencing. I asked them to get me the resources so I knew where their statistics were coming from, this is so I could confirm or deny their credibility; I didn't here back from them. I figured out the web site the information came from and asked the site for the references so I could confirm the numbers; once again I received nothing. When I research items, people are always ready and willing to give you their resources, even when they are from a hack site because most people don't know how to identify a hack site. When a site doesn't want to give you their resource information, it is usually a hack site and the demographics are propaganda, not factual. In this case, this is why all the references from this site at the bottom of the page was pictures and not links, you would have to hand jam them in and most people won't bother; I'm not most people. Only one link was legit out of the first six and only two had operational links; the second operational link went to a professors paper which isn't legit because a professor can write anything to match their agenda and in this case, the professors numbers didn't match the FBI's data base. The professor was from a hyper left leaning school and their paper showed their bias, I like dealing with fact so lets get started.

Much of the data this site was trying to present was in the ball park but the reasoning behind why it was happening was flawed do to hateful rhetoric which has been taught by their so called leaders. Poverty and crime work together in a vicious circle, the only way to lower it (you will never eliminate it) is to go after the route causes; many of the facts I will state will not be politically correct but they will be accurate. I do not know why the FBI didn't have the Latino stats in with the rest of the stats so I will give you just the Black and White Stats in comparison.

Race	Population	% of POP	% arrested for crimes compared to national Pop.	Arrest % compared to race POP	% Births out of Marriage	% UnEmp. Rate (True Numbers)	% High School Drop-Outs
White	227,263,600	72.4	63.3	94.3	29.1	7.7	17.0
Blacks	39,551,400	12.6	28.5	226.1	72.2	16.2	33.9

These numbers are taken strait off the FBI web site so if you have a problem with them, go there and complain; you can complain to me about my commentary. We have politicians lying to people about why there is such a gap between the amount of blacks and whites in jail and on the economic ladder. When you look at these numbers, you need to realize that the difference is not across the nation, but concentrated in the large cities. The politicians in these big cities have created the environment of economic problems and crime; look at Detroit for a good example, it was suppose to be the liberal city example for all to follow and now it is bankrupt; lets see what happened. It has been ran by the same liberal party for forty years, they are responsible and what have they accomplished? Factories left, over half the population left, crime rate increased, house value dropped by over 90%, and it became the biggest city to ever file bankruptcy, good job Democrats.

If every thing in a societal community is the same, then the percentage of crime of any particular group would be the same at 100%; as we look at the numbers above, the Black arrest percentage is 226.1% of their population. This community per capita, using the FBI numbers, has more criminals then the other communities, but why? To me two of the major factors are lack of an adequate education and out of wedlock birth rates. The black community compared to the white community has twice the out of wedlock birth rate and twice the drop-out rate, this to me is what has led to twice the unemployment due to lack of proper education and twice the people behind bars due to no good father role model and lack of adequate parenting; I do not believe it is a coincidences. The only people to blame is the leaders within that community for their problems. When you have a community, no matter white, black, or any other race who will only vote people who look like them, not only are you being racist but you are not judging a book by the content of its character, but the color of their skin.

We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.

Martin Luther King

Everyone in Detroit knew Kwame Kilpatrick was a criminal yet they elected him and then reelected him, Martin Luther King would have said, "You Reaped What you Sowed."

Martin Luther King was a very insightful man and a true leader not only within his community but throughout America as has been many other preachers; what do you think Martin Luther King would say about Jeremiah Wright? He would say he's not a preacher of God's word just as he would say about several other prominent people calling themselves preachers, doing nothing but dividing Americans to help fill their pockets; do I need to mention their names?

Every man must decide whether he will walk in the light of creative altruism or in the darkness of destructive selfishness.

Martin Luther King

Bill Cosby, Senator Allen West, Condoleezza Rice, Dr. Ben Carson, and Clarence Thomas are good role model who have tried to make it better and be a role model for the black community, but the "several other prominent people calling themselves role models" keep calling them "Uncle Tom" and worse; isn't this preaching prejudice? Many people have tried to give all in poverty a better chance for their children by doing school vouchers, this is so anyone can send their children to a better school if they are in a failing school. Now who keeps blocking this? The liberal Democrats but again I ask why? The answer is simple, they care more about the Teacher's Unions and their money then they do your kids. Remember what I said earlier that caused the problems in any community, "a lack of an adequate education" which is what vouchers will help change for the good, just look at the results why they were allowed before our current president stopped them.

The function of education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. Intelligence plus character - that is the goal of true education.

Martin Luther King

This pretty well lays it out and if you are offended by the truth, I can't help you which is what I am trying to do. Unless you take a truly unbiased look, the gap which is growing between the poverty level and middle class people will continue to grow, as it has under this president. It will continue to grow and we will not only have more people in all communities with a higher out of wedlock birth rate and drop-out rate; we will have more of our children going to jail and being buried. To answer the last questing about longer sentences; on average the black sentences are longer and it looks like a bias. When you look at the stats, more of the black inmates are repeat offenders hence the reason for the longer sentences.

All of this can change but one of the first items needs to be turning in the criminals instead of, "they're not bothering me" or "I'll take care of this my way"; this just ends up with someone dead, it may not be you this time but it will be your time sooner or later. Anonymous calls can save you and maybe one of your kids, but I know what you're thinking, "You're not from the streets, you don't understand!" You would be wrong again and if I could of changed one thing, I wished I had did things differently. I made it out but several of my friends didn't. I was one of the lucky ones, but it's too late to change your mind when your friend is dying in your arms. I am older and hopefully wiser now and realize my hotheaded days weren't that smart, I (along with some others) am surprised I wasn't taken out before I turned 25, but I still have the ghost I can't forget. If what I am telling you upsets you but saves one life, it is worth it. You are the only one who can change your community and yourself, no government handout, no honor among criminals, and especially no politician can help you achieve the American dream; the choice is yours.   

Taking Guns and Client List Any Way Possible

Many people say the government isn't coming for your guns, they wouldn't do illegal searches, and law enforcement always abide by the US Constitution; if you believe that, you are an ostrich and really need to get your head out of the sand. If you know much about gun laws, you know running illegal guns are against federal law and according to federal law, no one, elected official, military personnel, or even law enforcement is allowed to break this law. We all remember the "Fast and the Furious", where Attorney General Eric Holder illegally gave the Mexican drug lords illegal weapons which ended up in the death of three Peace Officers. Eric Holder denied knowing anything about it, testifying to Congress, until emails were found linking him to it. The real reason for the Fast and Furious was to make it seem as if we had an "Illegal Arms" problem so after John Kerry stabbed to American Citizens in the back (explained further in the reading), the UN could come in and take our guns. Even though the illegal assailant, Eric Holder, lied to congress and orchestrated this criminal act, he was never raided, faced any charges, or removed from office. I wonder if our federal and state government would give us the same courtesy or would they do illegal searches?

The first story starts out in San Diego California, the ATF came into Ares Armor and asked about some gun parts and the client list. The Ares Armor Executive Officer, Dimitrios Karras told them they could search (without a warrant) any item or building they owned, offering to give them the equipment in question to the ATF for their own testing; the Agent in Charge turned to Mr. Karras and said they only wanted the clients list which again Mr. Karras refused to give them. Sensing something awry, Mr. Karras went requesting a restraining order against the ATF from searching the stores and receiving his client list without probable cause which was granted by the judge, the ATF had no reason for their client list and served the restraining order on the ATF. Three days later the ATF violated the restraining order and raided the establishment taking their client list. My question is, what would happen to us if we violated a restraining order and who do you call when the one violating the law is the one who the one charged with upholding the law. It gets better, after Mr. Karras went public with this illegal raid, the ATF Threaten this Gun Parts Dealer for telling the public the truth; I think that is a crime too. I know what your thinking, its probably an isolated incident; the same thing happened to an Oregon Gun Store which was  Illegally Raided by Feds, and here is yet another instance of the Police Caught On Tape Raid Business without a warrant because someone over dosed not in the business, but three floors up in the building. I'm beginning to believe this is the norm for our law enforcement. I know what you are thinking; We can trust our elected officials to be honest and do what is right.

We have Liberal Senator Dianne Feinstein caught in a lie, she does want everyone's guns and this tape shows you the depth of which lying liberals will go to in order to get what they want, currently it's your gun. Here is Liberal Representative Jan Schakowsky saying Assault Weapons ban 'Just the Beginning, hand gun bands are next.' You also have Liberal California State Senator Leland Yee trying to ban more guns in California but wants no debate or discussion; only his opinion matters. Don't forget, Liberal State senator Democrat Maria Chappelle-Nadal wants to mandate parents to tell schools if they own guns. We do have some like Liberal New York Governor Cuomo who will tell you they want to confiscate and band all guns, he says confiscation could be an option, anyone, especially conservatives who disagree, Governor Cuomo says, "are not welcome in New York." Many of these law makers don't tell you the truth, they want to own guns but they do not want the "common citizens" to. They are hypocrites and elitist like Liberal Democratic Senator R.C. Soles from North Carolina, a long time Anti-Gun advocate who shoots Kyle Blackburn, an intruder breaking into his house, or Liberal Democratic Senator Donne Trotter, a stanch Anti-Gun advocate who was arrested for trying to carry a gun onto a plane. When you have our president trying to install Dr. Vivek Hallegere Murthy as US Surgeon General, an Anti-Gun zealot, you ask "what could go wrong. Dr. Vivek Hallegere Murthy wants all doctors and dentist to grill you on if you own a gun to find a ways to disqualify you as a gun owner and make it a mandatory part of your health records. I see something wrong with this, don't you? Last we have John Kerry signing the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty which if you read, gives the UN the right to seize your weapons. Did you notice few of the prime time news channels covered this?

I ask you again, do you trust your government? If you do maybe you should read the story about Randy Weaver, it will show you just how far some will go to get what they want; as Nancy Pelosi said, "By any means necessary". Please leave a comment.

Muslims and Jihadist Training Camps in Texas

There are Muslim Training Camps in Arlington, Houston, and Dallas Texas which are identified by the FBI, but there may be more. You will hear from an organization called Fake Terror that there are no training camps, I even seen a video on line where a nice elderly lady said "they have always treated us nice" which I am sure is true but the FBI says there is one there and I have read their declassified documents and believe them. I will be the first to say I don't trust our government  including the FBI but the FBI has put together some good information on terrorist groups in the US. If you want to help, you should be on the lookout for Terrorist Group Logos and report them to the FBI; let them deal with the problem and if nothing happens, blog about it. We all have heard, "Not all Muslims are Terrorist and not all Terrorist are Muslim", and this is true but many Muslims who say they do not support terrorist also don't condemn them, report nothing to the authorities when their Imam preaches hate, or even when they know someone within the Mosque may be planning an attack. The problem comes from an accepted custom in the Muslim culture of legitimate lying.

Donald Hudson wrote an article outlining what lying means in the Muslim culture and their  use of deception. and disinformation. Mr. Hudson wrote, " But, Islamic terrorists have their own terms: taqiyya (pronounced tak-e-ya) : precautionary dissimulation or deception and keeping one's convictions secret and a synonymous term, kitman: mental reservation and dissimulation or concealment of malevolent intentions. Taqiyya and kitman or 'holy hypocrisy' has been ingrained throughout Arabic culture for over fourteen hundred years since it was developed by Shiites as a means of defence and concealment of beliefs against Sunni unbelievers. As the Prophet said: 'he who keeps secrets shall soon attain his objectives.' The skilful use of taqiyya and kitman was often a matter of life and death against enemies; it is also a matter of life and death to many contemporary Islamic terrorists. As so often in the history of Islam, a theological doctrine became operational." I guess we can see now why it is hard to believe anything an ideology or religion says when lying is one of their cornerstones. If you want to see an example of Taqiya caught on tape, here is Taqiya in practice in the US. Something you need to remember here is you are not fighting a country called "Terrorism" but a Muslim ideology in which a person may not be a terrorist but will lie to you to protect their Muslim brother for it is commanded of them in the Quran. Most Imams will tell you about Islamic law regarding those (Muslims) who aid kuffar (non-Muslims) in fighting Muslims is very clear, their blood is not sacred; you can kill them.

When it come to Texas, the FBI  has prosecuted several people and identified organizations involved in terrorism. What many don't know because they don't do research is the Boston Bomber, Tarek Mehanna accomplice, Joseph Maldonado, aka Daniel Aljughaifi. Mehanna went to Somalia to receiving military-type training for jihad and was from Texas. Maldonado pleaded guilty in the Southern District of Texas, admitting that he had traveled from Houston to Africa to Somalia to join the Islamic Courts Union and elements of al-Qaida. Maldonado was sentenced to 10 years in prison, the maximum statutory penalty for receiving military training from a terrorist organization before the Boston Bombing. My question is, "how was he able from prison to help Tarek Mehanna?" It is probably due to all the bleeding heart liberals who want violent prisoners to able to have cell phones and computers because it is offensive not to. It doesn't matter that everything from drug deals to putting hits on people to now helping a person commit a terrorist act is the result. The FBI nailed several people along with organizations in the terrorist camps sting in Texas.

Individiuals involved:

• Adnan Babar Mirza (Guilty) 15 Years with No Parole
• Kobie Diallo Williams (Guilty) 54 Months
• Shiraz Syed Qazi (Guilty) 10 months sentence + deportation
• Syed Maaz Shah (Guilty) Sentenced 6 1/2 years + deportation

Organizations involved:

• Islamic Circle of North America
• Whyislam
• Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)

Remember a few months back when I said CAIR was associated with terrorist, I received some nasty email calling me a racist and anti-Muslim but I'm not anti-Muslim, I'm pro-American. If you are Muslim and want to melt into our society like every other culture has, great, if not, leave my country. There was a video at Channel 11, KHOU Houston detailing Texas Islamic Terrorist training camps but the link doesn't work anymore and it has been removed from their archives, I guess it wasn't politically correct, but lets see what we have found in Texas.

Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari, 20, a citizen of Saudi Arabia and resident of Lubbock, Texas, was arrested late yesterday by FBI agents in Texas on a federal charge of attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction in connection with his alleged purchase of chemicals and equipment necessary to make an improvised explosive device (IED) and his research of potential U.S. targets.

The Holy Land Foundation, U.S.-based Muslim charity for Relief and Development, received a 108 guilty verdicts for funneling more than $12 million to terrorist groups in Dallas, Texas.

Barry Walter Bujol, Jr., an American-born Houston Texas man is sentenced to 20 years in prison for attempting to provide material support to al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, or AQAP.

Hosam Smadi will be spending the next 24 years in prison for trying to blow up a Dallas skyscraper.

Four, Why Islam and ICNA workers (coined by the media as the “Houston Taliban”) held jihad training camps on Islamic Society of Greater Houston property in Willis Texas north of Houston.

There is no doubt about it, there are Muslim terrorist training camps in America and yes, even in Texas. Check out these videos ( Video 1, Video 2, Video 3, Video 4) and make sure you listen to this video very carefully. The question we need to ask is two fold, why is the national news media not covering this; if we know they are there, why haven't we sent them packing? The media won't cover it because it isn't politically correct, this is why the media is becoming worthless in America; the freedom of the press was set up to prevent government from suppressing the truth, but now the media is doing it on its own for political reasons. This should be making you think; you just had a good news reporter quit citing censorship of political stories on politicians the editors liked, this is called political bias. Do you still trust the media?

Allowing Voting ID or Voting Fraud

People who oppose voter ID push one of two scenarios of why we don't need it;

1st, they claim it is to suppress the "voting minority", 2nd, they claim there is no fraud, both of these claims are ludicrous but may show the real reason. No matter what side you are on, you need to step back and ask yourself; What would be the pros and cons of requiring a voter ID.

1st, anyone can go get a photo ID in any of the 50 states for voting no matter your race so if you really are interested in voting, take yourself to the appropriate place and get one of the required or acceptable photo IDs. Everyone who goes are subject to the same scrutiny and process so there is not a drop of truth that it is to suppress the minority. The NAACP is one of the stanch opponents against voter ID; the funny and hypocritical part of this worthless organization which divides our country is that the NAACP required marchers protesting North Carolina voter ID law to show, you guessed it, a photo ID to march. So let me get this strait; an ID is required to assemble for a protest but not when exercising the most important gift given to us by the US Constitution, voting. Does anyone see the irony here?

2nd, they claim you can't have voter fraud or there is no fraud. The New York City’s watchdog, Department of Investigations (DOI), during the last election sent undercover agents to 63 polling places. These agent in no way should have been able to vote but 61 of the 63 were allowed to vote, that is a 97% failure rate of the polling stations catching an illegal voter. Does this make you feel good? In Michigan, a state audit shows 1,500 dead people and prisoners casted votes. In Long Island New York while just starting to investigate, they have found 270 dead people who voted in Nassau County after dying, includes a man who voted 14 times since his death. In the midst of the over voter ID fight, to return integrity to Walthall County Mississippi, a federal court decree ordered Walthall County to purge its voter rolls after having 124% more registered voters than voting-age-eligible residents. Could an extra 24% of people voting swing an election? But we have more problems then just dead people voting.

Florida election officials were denied help by the Attorney General to confirm citizenship status (and voter fraud) for an estimated 180,000 illegal immigrants registered to vote in Florida. In 2011, Colorado’s secretary of state found by comparing drivers’ licenses that Colorado had potentially as many as 16,270 non-citizens on its voting rolls. In Florida in 2012, illegal alien voters along with immigrants that are prohibited from voting (i.e. convicted felons) were detected voting. Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted announced Wednesday that his office found non-citizens illegally cast ballots in the 2012 presidential election and has referred the case for to the justice department for prosecution; nothing was done. On the other hand, law enforcement officials have charged 12 people with using absentee ballots to skew an election in Georgia. I think we can safely say we need voter IDs to prevent voter fraud but ask yourself again; why wouldn't someone want voter ID.

The only real logical reason is so a particular group can win election. These groups do not care about the law, the rights of others, the US Constitution, or what is best for our country; they only care about getting elected by any means, legal or illegal, necessary. I guess you can say this is fraud by definition, or stealing, but what it truly is, is treason by definition because it is the betrayal and/or disloyalty to the United States and the US Constitution who these mostly elected officials are sworn to uphold. SO the end of it is, if your political figure doesn't want an ID required to vote, you need a new official.

Why Our Ethics and Moral Values are Declining

There are too many areas to go into in an effort to show the problem we are running into in our society do to the growing lack of ethics and morals so I picked one that all true Americans can get behind, protecting our kids against pedophiles. First, what is the definition of a pedophile? As an adjective it is an adult who is sexually attracted to young children; as a noun it is an adult who is sexually active with young children. Children is anyone 17 years of age or younger. I am old school so if it was up to me, every pedophile would have an automatic life sentence without a chance of parole. Every year fifty eight thousand US children are ordered into the unprotected custody of their identified sexually abusive parent or guardian; this doesn't count the ones who are sexually abused away from the home. I have always been for the protection of our children but I cannot say that is the same for many of our politicians, judges, schools, or even our media.

Prop 35 in California passed by a landslide, it is an anti-human trafficking, proposition, and makes it illegal for convicted sex offenders to have anonymous online identity. The law forces sex offenders to notify law enforcement every time they adopt a new online identity, which could allow websites to selectively restrict their comments. Guess who is defending them, the liberal ACLU; stating, “When the government starts gathering online profiles for one class of people, we all need to worry about the precedent it sets.” This shouldn't come as a surprise, the ACLU has not defended liberties or the protection of people for a long time. The ACLU will defended North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBA) whose website incited Charles Jaynes, 25, to molestation and murder Jeffrey Curley, 10, on Oct. 1, 1997. NAMBA is all about raping and molesting kids but the ACLU decided to defend them anyway; maybe they have members within NAMBA or just leaving their options open. Either way, they should never receive tax payers dollars.

You have politicians who try to do the right thing, take Democratic Governor Jay Nixon of Missouri. He veto HB 301, going against his own party. The bill that would have weakened sex offender laws.

Senator Don Benton and Representative Jan Angel from Washington state tried to get harder punishments for child rapist after 13 year old Alycia Nipp, was raped and murdered at the hands of a convicted Level III sex offender. They were blocked by Senator Debbie Regala, Democrat-Tacoma, upheld by fellow Democrats and Democratic Lieutenant Governor Brad Owen.

California Democratic Congress Representative Jackie Speier introduced a bill, SB 1172, which would protect pedophiles. The Republicans attempted to add an amendment specifying “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation” but the amendment was defeated by Democrats. Representative Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., stated that all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law. California is already know for protecting pedophile teachers.

Martha Robertson Democrat from New York to accept fundraiser from self confessing child molester. She didn't care, she just wanted the money as do most politicians from both parties.

The leader of the University of Texas-Pan American’s chapter of the Young Democrats Billy Wayne Johnson was arrested for indecency with an 8-year-old child, according to Action 4 News. Why is he still the leader of the Young Democrats?

I used mostly Democrats above because they seem to be caught more often then the Republicans, by the voting records the Democrats block more legislation that would protect our children then the Republicans as well. When I was looking I found on the national Democratic site, this moderator who doesn't check facts and was just spreading propaganda; this is what is wrong today.  

I found pedophilia being defended at every turn by Democrats but not so much by Republicans and uncle Ted (Kennedy) left a pregnant girl in a car to die. When our politicians from both parties and their minions promote false rhetoric, it means they are either guilty of what they accuse the other party of or they cannot defend their stance on the topics so they misdirect.

We have the same problem in our schools at all levels. A professor at DePaul University in Chicago, Elizabeth Kelly, defends the sexual predators of children instead of the victims. In Rochester New York, Twenty-two teachers at an upstate Rochester New York public school wrote letters to a judge supporting a colleague who sexually assaulted an 8-year-old boy. The Michigan Education Association (MEA) Teacher Union is going to arbitration to try to force the West Branch-Rose City school district to pay a former teacher who was convicted of molesting a student a $10,000 severance buyout. The whole school system has went from protecting our kids to preaching agendas and protecting the pedophiles. No wonder we have went from 14th in the world in 2010  to 36th in the world in 2013. We need to get back to teaching our kids, not indoctrinating.

We know when it comes to protecting our kids, the judicial system will always protect them, or will they. In Montana, District Judge G. Todd Baugh sentenced a teacher who raped a child to a 30-Day Sentence. In New York, Prosecutors wanted 7 years for each of the 48 felony child rape counts admitted to by Andrew Goodman. He plead guilty which should have added up to 336 years but Justice Martin Murphy sentenced him to just two years. You ask, can it get worse, yes. Pennsylvania Pedophile Judge Mark Ciavarella Jr. was convicted of trafficking 4,000 children for inmates to have sex within the prison system. He was sentenced to 28 years but what about the Warden and prison guards; they had to know.

The media is just as bad; instead of doing what the media should do and finding out the facts, many times what they believe and report comes down to their feelings and political position void of any and all facts. Barbra Walters defends pedophile Woody Allen of being a child molester, no matter what the facts are even when put in her face by her own View partners, her personal feelings for her friend voids any facts or truth. The Denver Post editorial page editor Curtis Hubbard defends child pedophiles in Colorado. Like or hate Bill O’Reilly he is a strong advocate for protecting the kids and when these two journalist met, Bill put Hubbard who claims life-time probation is strong punishment in his place.

Our politicians, judges, schools, or even our media has caused our society to stop protecting the kids and has promoted protecting the offenders instead of the victims. Churches was once where any kid could go and be protected, even though 85% of churches are still that way, a growing number are not. We all know about the Prominent Priest Benedict Groeschel defended child molesting priest, he did later apologize but that is not good enough. The Blessed Sacrament Church Catholic Church in St. Paul Minnesota blamed the mother for not protecting her boys from child molesting priest, the congregation, as they should have been, were outraged. Other religions flat out condone pedophilia, the Islam prophet had a bride of 9 years old, in their religion when you get married, you consummate the marriage that night.

But in our society, if something meets our agenda, we ignore the effects it will have for our own physical and monetary greed. Amazon was selling a self-published book defending pedophiles called a Child-lover's Code of Conduct" by Philip R. Greaves II, they did finally remove it but only after being threatened with a boycott. Other parties don't care, Many in the liberal environmentalist movement adore their shooting star Vera Scroggins. They ignore or condone her history of advocating incest and pedophilia but will defend her to the death if anyone disparages her with these facts; don't they have kids or are they in on it?

It is strange how agendas can change your view of guilt even when we are talking about protecting our children. If I was an 18 year old male and forced a 14 year old female to have sex with me, I would (rightly so) be convicted of rape, branded a pedophile, and put in jail. When an 18 year old forces a 14 year old to have sex its rape; unless the 18 year old is gay then it is the persecution of gays by the victim's family especially if it's a lesbian. I don't care if you are male or female, I don't care your race, I don't care your political party, and I don't care your sexual orientation; if I as a heterosexual male would be convicted of rape, branded a pedophile, and put in jail, you as a lesbian should be treated equal under the law for committing the same violation.If not, this is known as special rights which is against our Constitution; are we all not suppose to be treated and penalized the same?

Why Unions are Dying?

The history of unions in America started with the National Labor Union (NLU) in 1866, the main reason for unions at their foundation was for reasonable working hours, a livable wage, safer working conditions, and the end of child labor. When labor unions started, you were not required to join but most did because it was free, there were no dues, and their leadership was all-voluntary without pay. In the unions when they started, an employer had to have a true reason to fire someone but if it were valid, they would be fired. The unions were there to help the good, hardworking, and honest employee who gave his boss a fair days work for a fair days pay. I do not think there is anyone who could complain or dislike the original reason and stance for the foundation of unions in America. You need to realize as well, there were no labor laws or federal laws protecting the workers like we have today and unions had nothing to do with politics by party definition. What have unions developed into today compared to their original purpose in the beginning?  

As I stated above, unions were initially started to get companies to have reasonable working hours, a livable wage, safety, and to end child labor. The reason (most) unions are dyeing is they are no longer for the honesty, integrity, and protection of the good worker; they are for protecting any worker, even if committing criminal acts, intimidation, bullying, and blackmail. In the beginning, an employer had to have a true reason to fire someone but if it were valid, they would be fired, now you cannot fire a union member with a valid reason because all the union wants is their money. In Minnesota, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) wanted workers fired because they were not members paying dues and would not pay service fees. Wait, “And wouldn’t pay service fees”, service fees are fees paid to a union so non-union people can work. Isn’t this called discrimination; it is called extortion. If you watch TV you could have seen Steven Crowder assaulted at union protest in Michigan, Michigan Union destroys tent, cut tent lines with people inside, or even an African American Man beaten by SEIU Thugs in St Louis while they yell racist remarks at him; what party is pro-union and condones these actions? The scary part is who was in charge of the voting machines in Nevada during the last election where Senator Harry Reid went from being down by double digits the day before the election to winning in a landslide? SEIU. Well at least teacher unions are for protecting our kids; think again.

In the beginning, an employer would fire someone for a valid reason and in the school system they error on the side of caution, if you had a inkling of hurting a child, you would be fired, now it’s almost impossible to fire a teacher who is a union member, even if the molest a child. In New York City, if you catch a teacher who is a child molester in the United Federation of Teachers (UFT) teachers union, you cannot fire them. They will be sent to a “Rubber Room”, still draw their pay, and the taxpayers are stuck with the bill, but for the union it is still OK, they gets their dues. You might think this is an anomaly but in all the teachers unions I checked, it seems to be the standard. In Michigan, the Michigan Education Association (MEA) teachers union is fighting to get a convicted child molester teacher a severance package worth thousands; for what, molesting our children, he should be hung. The California Teachers Association (CTA) teachers union pushed politicians to kill an Anti-Pedophile bill. Why you might ask, California does have the highest number of documented pedophiles in the nation and I am sure many pay dues in this unions, the unions do not want them to lose their jobs, they will not get their dues. The union does not care about the kids, only money and power, just ask Bob Chanin from the biggest teachers union; the National Education Association (NEA). He will tell you it is not because we care about children; it is because we want power and money; at least he is honest. Teacher Unions members have gotten away from protecting and teaching our children, now they protecting the pedophiles and give them a target rich environment to prey on our children in the public school system. Now you know the reason liberals keep stopping educational vouchers, if they allowed kids to go to better private schools, first, these kids would learn the truth instead of being indoctrinated, second, the unions would lose dues; remember what Bob Chanin stated, it is not about the kids, only money and power.

The third leg of this stool is with the largest unions, the MOB has taken an interest because of the revenue ability. When the largest unions have obvious MOB ties, which are documented by the FBI, why would anyone want to be a member? Remember the reason for unions when they were started in America, “reasonable working hours, a livable wage, safety, and to end child labor.” Remember the membership requirements union officer pay, “you were not required to join, there were no dues, and their leadership was all-voluntary without pay.” Remember who were members of the unions, “good, hardworking, and honest employee who gave his boss a fair days work for a fair days pay.” Now what do we see today, extortion, protecting pedophiles, MOB affiliations, violent attacks, destruction of private property by union members, racist attacks if that person disagrees with the union, and massive dues allowing Union Leadership to living in luxury. A few years back, several large unions tried to get a bill passed to show them how the union members voted in elections; luckily, they failed. The VW plant in Tennessee rejected the United Auto Workers Union (UAW) so now the UAW is challenging their loss with the National Labor Relations Board (NLBR). The UAW wants the NLBR to allow the UAW to force its way into the non-union VW plant no matter how the workers voted; I thought unions were for the workers?

Why are unions dying? Unions are dying because unions are no longer for the American worker or their values. The true American worker has to pick up the slack of those who do not pull their own load because the unions have made it so the non-producing workers cannot be fired! The true American worker who teach want an atmosphere where they can protect our children, not watch them be open game for pedophile teachers. Finally, the true American worker is starting to wake up. There are good unions out there, but most, especially large unions, do not care about you, your children, your community, or our nation; they only care about money, power, and oh yes, their dues.