The UN Verses US Rights on Taxes and Guns

The UN is voting on resolutions which could directly affect you. Why are we not being informed of these resolutions by our elected officials?

United Nations Taxation

Why do most people in the US not know there is a bill at the UN to levy a tax on all US citizens? I don’t know about you but I don’t even like our government taking money from me let alone the UN. The reason most have not heard about it is because our news agencies do not have our best interest as a nation set in their agendas. Out of all of the “Big News” providers, ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, Fox, PBS, New York Times, NBC, The Washington Post, and The Washington Times after looking for hours I only found four to have an article about the UN’s plan to tax every person in the US; BBC, Fox, New York Times, and The Washington Times. Only two of them, BBC and Fox could I find anything without digging, the stories are listed below.

The UN wants to tax all people especially us in the US and many of our law makers are accepting it; Read below.

Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST); it needs to be lost permanently!

If they tax us 1 cent on every $1,000 dollars how long will it be before they are taxiing us 10 cents, then $1, then $10 and so on. We should know if you let any government official start a tax, they will never stop it and always raise it.

United Nations Gun Control

I do not like Secretary of State John Kerry, I never have and never will but as I have said before I am an independent and as much as it pains me I have to give him a pat on the back. The UN is the most corrupt organization on earth, make no doubt about it. Recently even though John Kerry is against civilian gun ownership he told the UN General Assembly "The United States is steadfast in its commitment to achieve a strong and effective Arms Trade Treaty that helps address the adverse effects of the international arms trade on global peace and stability," and latter clarified, "We will not support any treaty that would be inconsistent with U.S. law and the rights of American citizens under our Constitution, including the Second Amendment". As I said, I can not stand Mr. Kerry but in this case he has done the right thing but his past history has shown he will flip, flop on anything that will give him more recognition or power. If he holds this line I can do nothing but praise his actions but the question is, why did he have to make this statement?

General Assembly Resolution-18 Dec 2006
“Recognizing that arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation are essential for the maintenance of international peace and security” and “Further requests the Secretary-General to provide the group of governmental experts with any assistance and services that may be required for the discharge of its tasks”

General Assembly Resolution- 8 Jan 2009

“Recognizing that arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation are essential for the maintenance of international peace and security”

IV. Record-keeping

11. The choice of methods for record-keeping is a national prerogative. States will ensure that accurate and comprehensive records are established for all marked small arms and light weapons within their territory and maintained in accordance with paragraph 12 below in order to enable their competent national authorities to trace illicit small arms and light weapons in a timely and reliable manner.

12. From the time of the adoption of this instrument, records pertaining to marked small arms and light weapons will, to the extent possible, be kept indefinitely, but in any case a State will ensure the maintenance of: (a) Manufacturing records for at least 30 years; and (b) All other records, including records of import and export, for at least 20 years.

13. States will require that records pertaining to small arms and light weapons held by companies that go out of business be forwarded to the State in accordance with its national legislation.

United Nations Disarmament Yearbook 2011: Part II
Page 74
A number of States established and revised national legislative frameworks, integrated small arms action plans into national development strategies, worked on weapons collection and destruction programs, improved on their stockpile management, and entered into international cooperation and assistance. States further improved the security of stockpiles and destroyed surplus weapons, often with assistance provided by the United Nations, including its three regional centers for peace and disarmament, in partnership with donors, regional organizations and civil society. A growing number of States increased transparency by reporting their small arms transfers to the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms.

Page 76
CASA continued to undertake, coordinate and oversee activities such as the development of the International Small Arms Control Standards; the improvement of the Programs of Action Implementation Support System;13 assessing the adverse impact of unregulated arms transfers on the work of the United Nations; the formulation of an implementation framework for the International Ammunition Technical Guidelines; and the establishment of implementation modalities for the assistance proposals submitted by affected States in combating the proliferation of small arms through the Group of Interested States in Practical Disarmament Measures.

Page 77
Participating States also agreed that the GIS should serve as a forum for information sharing to promote policy dialogue on relevant issues. In this connection, it facilitated the exchange of views related to the United Nations small arms process; the link between small arms issues, conflict prevention and an arms trade treaty; and the partnership between disarmament communities based in New York and Geneva.

I have to ask myself, is our government protecting our right to privacy and possible unconstitutional search and seizure?  The answer is no, just look below at what was taken from the UN’s dada base. If you look up the meaning “Procurement through national product” is the US Government telling the UN civilian arm production rates and registration data; does this scare you because it does me?

Page 112

Page 118
I hope you know what “Additional information and clarification” means; it’s your registration information.

We need to get these traitorous elected officials who support UN items which infringe on our constitutional rights out of our government; they are selling our nation to the highest bidder. Next the UN will want to tell us how many children we can have; actually it has already been brought up in the UN.  The United Nations published a 240-page document talking about how to accomplish this endeavor in 2004.

Now do you think our news agencies or politicians are protecting us? If the UN was here to help us why would nine of the UN Human Rights Council be supporters of slavery (been there, seen it first hand). I have been to many countries but have not been to all countries on the UNHRC so the number may be higher. Why would the UN allow it’s vehicles be used in a terrorist attack and it happens repeatedly.

The UN is nothing but a money pit and we need to be out of it. The money we give to the UN, which is so disproportionate to the rest of the UN members, can be better used at home.

No comments:

Post a Comment