Terrorist, Muslim, Our Government, and the Future

I am the most non-discriminating person you will ever meet but at the same time I am a realist; I refuse to turn a blind eye because something isn't "Politically Correct". Remember I told you months ago about the 35 Muslim Terrorist Training Camps in America "Muslims and Jihadist Training Camps in America" being tracked by the FBI. Sheikh Gilani from "Muslims of America" publicly stated "come see what we are about". This is what happened when a News Crew took up his offer to visit the "Muslims of America" compound in Red House VA (one of the places identified by the FBI as having a terrorist training camp). My question is "Why haven't our government shut down these hateful terrorist training camps down yet?" There are Muslims who are our Sadiqi (friends), like Shakil Afridi who helped us get Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan and is now charged with murder because of it by the Pakistan government while our government does nothing.

 

In Virginia, Shaker Elsaed, a controversial Muslim Imam urged Muslims in American to wage violence against non Muslim American citizens, isn't this "Hate Speech"? Where is our Homeland Security and the FBI to remove this threat and his followers from America? If this guy was a Christian or a Jew, the government would be all over him. Maybe the answer lies with what is happening in Egypt. Obama’s Muslim Advisers, Dalia Moghaed, blame Coptic Christians for Muslim attacks against them by the Muslim Brotherhood (Known Terrorist Group); could this be because of Dalia Moghaed links to the Muslim Brotherhood or Malil Obama, President Obama's half brother's who works for Islamic Dawa Organization (IDO), a subset of the Muslim Brotherhood. It does bother my that a person working for a terrorist group is within an arm reach of the white house. You can here President Obama thank ISNA, and on ISNA's web site they say they have no affiliation with the Muslim Brother hood but in the 2007, the United States Department of Justice named ISNA, along with Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the North American Islamic Trust, as an unindicted co-conspirator and one of a number of "entities who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood. We also currently have Mohamed Elibiary receiving a promotion at Homeland Security even though he has been tied to the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

Our society especially on the left had better wise up, If a "Christian" doesn't like you because you are homosexual, the worst that will happen to you is a nasty word or two; a Muslim following their faith will never like you and it is their job to kill you according to their teachings, just ask Nebraska resident Ahmed Mohammed Tuma who is Muslim and tried to kill his sister and her female fiancee with a crow bar. Though he did not kill her, he is facing hate crime charges but this type of action is becoming more and more common in America. Bob Beckel, a stanch Democrat on 24 September 2013 demanded the same thing many on the other side of the isle has said, "No more Muslim Students coming here with visa, no more Mosques being built here until you stand up and denounce what's happened in the name of your prophet. It is not what your prophet meant as soon as I know, I don't know his mother's name and I don't care. The point is, that the time has come for Muslims in this country and other people in the world to stand up and be counted, and if you can't, you're cowards." I agree with him but would add one thing, if you won't denounce this violence in the name of your prophet then you need to be removed from the US and band from ever coming back. We need to protect our people and political correctness isn't the way, it will just lead to us and our children being murdered.

If you want to find Muslims who are not set on Jihad, look for the ones who do not want to do a "protest march" on 9-11, look for the ones who don't believe in honor killing Americans, and look for the ones like Shakil Afridi who helped us bring enemy number one to justice; do not look to ISNA, CAIR, or the North American Islamic Trust, they will stab you in the back. As we watch the world we see our ships being attacked by the pirates of Islam, our people being kidnapped and murdered by Islamist militant group called Katibat Moulathamine, and the FBI warns of Muslim terrorists plans of attacking fuel storage plants inside the US boarders. We need to wake up America, and weed out the bad Muslims in our country but keep the good, they are the ones who will accept a Christian, Jew, or anyone else into their house as a friend and be invited and go likewise. If we don't find a way to come together, Muslim, Jew, Christian, Atheist, Buddhist, Hindu, and any other group I missed as Americans against this violent teaching within the Muslim religion, in the not to far future we will have a blood bath in this country and all of us as Americans will win or we no longer will have a country.  

Hypocrites, Who? Our Politicians-The Nuclear Option

What just happened again? We have just watched as Senator Harry Reid has just violated the US Constitution; between our President and Senate this has become a national pass time. Our president spoke the truth back in 2005 when he was a Senator from Illinois about the nuclear option, "The American people want less partisanship in this town but everyone in this chamber knows that if the majority chooses to end the filibuster, if the choose to change the rules and put an end to democratic debate then the fighting, the bitterness, and the fighting will only get worse" but this was when the Republicans had the majority. Now our President says the exact opposite. Back in 2005 the Democrats were filibustering every nominee then President Bush tried to appoint; now that he is president lets see his hypocrisy. After Senator Reid violates the US Constitution, President Obama said, "Today's pattern of obstruction it just isn't normal, it's not what our founders envisioned, a deliberate and determined effort to obstruct everything, no matter what the merits, just to refight the results of an election is not normal, and for the sake of future generations we can't let it become normal, so I support the steps a majority of senators today took to change the way that Washington is doing business, more specifically the way the Senate does business. What a majority of senators determined by Senate rule is that they would restore the long standing tradition of considering judicial and public service nominations on a more routine basis." Isn't President Obama supose to be a "Constitutional lawyer? If he is he either needs to go back to school or he is lying on purpose to "We the People" again.

The US Constitution states in Article 2, Section 2,  "He (the president) shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

President Obama stated, " What a majority of senators determined by Senate rule is that they would restore the long standing tradition of considering judicial and public service nominations on a more routine basis." This is a flat out lie and the sad part is most Americans will not read the US Constitution but believe every word he says. Our founding father set it up this way to prevent us from being damaged by one party tyranny, if President Obama wanted to " restore the long standing tradition", he would have taken it for the 3/5ths 60% back to the 2/3rds 66% but he just wants more power as does Harry Reid. Listen to what then Senator Obama, Senator Clinton, Senator Schumer, yes Senator Reid, Senator Feinstein, Senator Biden, Senator Dodd, and Senator Baucus, all leaders in the Democratic Party said, they were right, the Nuclear Option violate the US Constitution and was completely wrong, shortly after this the Republican Party relented realizing it was unethical and destructive to the country. Fast forward to 2013 and the same Senators who were on the right side of the argument the last time hypocritically did what they knew was a violation of the US Constitution and was unethical and destructive to the country. Harry Reid said in 2008 there would be no Nuclear Option as long as he was leader, he is another politician lying and breaking promises when it suites him.

This is one of the most destructive moves politicians have done since I have been alive, every one who voted to do this should be removed from office which is the same thing I said toward the Republican party back in 2005. Our founding fathers put these rules into place for a reason and now once again a politician who cares nothing about our country, Constitution, or its people but only their desire and greed for more power has put us all in danger again. These will be the same ones complaining when the tables are turned and they are on the receiving end. The main reason I see this as bad is because there will now be a "I'll put whoever I want in office" good or reprehensible because I have all the power from both sides. Harry Reid is absolutely the Senator who has caused the most damage to our country in my lifetime; when the Republicans get into power and overturn Roe -v- Wade because all they need is a "Simple Majority", I don't want to hear those who voted for anyone passing this say a word. This will be devastating to this country and I don't believe either side will fix this travesty.

Obamacare, Dereliction of Duty by Our Politicians

What is the duty of our elected officials? At a bare minimum it is to read every bit of legislation presented to them before voting, to do what is best for their constituents, and to be honest, not purposefully lying to them or misspeaking due to lack of reading, research or neglect. This sounds like common since but it defiantly isn't political since for their words will say one thing and their actions seam to be the exact opposite. The two problems we have as Americans are our elected officials are dereliction of their duties and their disingenuous actions. If you are a politician or anyone else you should say what you stand for and stand for what you say.

The Affordable Care Act was passed on party lines with the Democrats for it and the Republicans against it many due to they were not allowed to read it before voting. We all remember the infamous words of Navy Pelosi, "We have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what is in it" which shows the dereliction of duties I am talking about. Everyone of the Congress members who voted on the bill without requiring it be read needs to be fired, I don't care if you replace them with another Democrat or Republican but the get paid $172,000 in their positions and should find the time to read these bills before they go out campaigning.  In the US House you had 34 Democrats with all the Republicans voting against it with 219 Democrats voting for it. In the US Senate, all Democratic and independent Senators voted for Affordable Care Act with only one Republican Sen. Jim Bunning from Kentucky giving them 60 votes. What this means is we had 219 Representatives in the US House and 60 Senators in the US Senate derelict their duties because they never read the Affordable Care Act before passing it.

Now we read "Senate Democrats Haunted By 2010 Vote That Paved The Way For Policy Cancellations Under Obamacare" and they should be; we now know that all these US Senators and Representatives who repeatedly said "You and keep your healthcare plan, doctor, and your premiums will be reduced" lied and new this was not true. We now know the employer mandate was delayed to help maintain the majority in the US Senate which would have been easily lost if the hammering employee took place before the elections. Senator John McCain (R) stabbed his own party in the back when they were trying to do the right thing and now has done a 180; its only because his job is on the line not because he wants to do what is right.

Just as soon as it goes into effect many employers will drop the common people like you and me to 29 hour work weeks to avoid the burdened of massive rise in cost we are seeing now not to mention the current estimate of between 90 and 105 million people will not get to keep their policies and doctors. Rasmussen poll reveals 55% of Americans think Obamacare is bad for the country and wants to repeal it while only 35% think it is good.  This is a train wreck, if you really want to help the people get rid of Obamacare and start to make things better by opening the state boarders for insurance, competition always brings down the price of everything and health insurance won't be any different. Get the federal government out of everything dealing with health care, making useless requirements which only run up the cost of health care does nothing for "We the People."

Nuclear War Will Soon be at Hand

The two most volatile nations in the world is Iran and North Korea; both have increased their military might by any ways possible and have demonstrated they would use this force by attacking the US; to purposefully and intentionally kill Americans. In late 1970s North Korea begins uranium mining operations and refinement. Under President Reagan, in 1985 US intelligence analysts suspect that North Korea, a signer of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is in the early stages of building an atomic bomb. In 1988, North Korea is added to the "State Sponsors of Terrorism" by President Reagan.

In 1991, George H. Bush withdrew all US nuclear weapons from South Korea and pursued North Korea to become compliant with the NPT. In 1992 for the first time, North Korea allows the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to inspect. Instead of compiling, the inspections were repeatedly block by North Koreans from two suspected nuclear waste sites.

Once President Clinton took office in 1993, in March North Korea threatens to withdraw from the NPT. Robert Gallucci starts a new round of negotiations and after all is said and done, IAEA Director-General Blix states they can no longer provide "any meaningful assurances" North Korea is not producing nuclear weapons. In 1994, the  United States and North Korea signed the "Agreed Framework": to freeze North Korea plutonium production for fuel oil, economic cooperation, and the construction of two modern light-water nuclear power plants. IAEA Chairman Hans Blix is "not very happy" with the Agreed; North Korea has too long a time limit to comply with the inspections regime. Two years later North Korea still has not made known the amount of plutonium they possess, the IAEA is not happy. In 1998 test an ICBM shooting it over Japan claiming it is a satellite.

President George W. Bush in 2002 named Iraq, Iran, and North Korea as the "Axis of Evil" threatening world peace. The US found that North Korea had ignored the deal with Robert Gallucci and was enriching uranium and North Korea admits having nuclear weapons. On 9 Oct 2006, North Korea test its first nuclear bomb.  In 2008, North Korea destroys its cooling towers for a their main reactor and is removed from the "State Sponsors of Terrorism".

Shortly after President Obama takes office, North Korea expelled nuclear inspectors and informed the IAEA that they would resume their nuclear weapons program. They ignore the UN and on 25 May 2009 it tests its second nuclear bomb and in 2013 its third.

What does this have to do with nuclear war? Everyone in America knows the Democrats usually are view as doing better on domestic issues while disliking anything type of military actions and Republicans are usually viewed as doing better on foreign issues while supporting military action. With North Korea, the Republicans kept them mostly in check but every time a Democrat took office, they advanced their nuclear agenda with only threats and no actions from the US they achieved their goal. They now have nuclear bombs and missiles to deliver them on our allies which has made the area very unstable. The same is happening in Iran, on 4 Nov 1979 with the refusal of President Carter to support our ally the Shah of Iran who was a strong American ally, radical fundamentalist over through the Shah and now instead of an ally we have an enemy. It wasn't until 20 Jan 1981, minutes after Carter's term in office ended, the 52 U.S. captives held at the U.S. embassy in Iran were released, ending the 444-day Iran hostage crisis due to Iran's fear of President Reagan.

Now we have an Iran about to be able to create a nuclear bomb who already has the delivery mechanism and our current paper tiger government will not do what is necessary to stop them. These Iranian radical Islamist will, unlike the North Koreans, use their newly found technology which will cause a trigger response letting the genie out of the bottle. With two nuclear Islamic nations (Iran and Pakistan) wishing to annihilate our strongest ally in the area (Israel), how long do you think it will take to pull that trigger? What do you think our response will be; they fear strong foreign leaders but walk all over weak ones like we currently have in office. This same scenario has just started again in Egypt with President Obama not standing with our long term ally; the only glimmer of hope is the Egyptian military removed the radicals from office but once again a weak foreign policy president has put us and our allies in danger.

The problem in America is the politics; no matter the facts, our political parties will lie about or refuse to acknowledge the truth. Our media who once honestly covered the blunders of our politicians unbiased, now even falsify report stories to help political agendas. How long will it take for one of North Korea's or Iran's nuclear bombs to be brought through our open boarders and set off in the US? What will we do then? Please reply and let me know what you think.

Let the Lazy Receive While Cutting the Pay of the Brave

"Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel warned Tuesday that troops and their families will be asked to sacrifice on pay and benefits to preserve readiness in an era of tighter budgets." We are giving everything including cell phones to the lazy but now the ones who could give the ultimate sacrifice and die for our country you want to give up their pay and benefits even though most already fall in the poverty level so the massive benefits to the lazy can continue; are you on crack?

"Hagel listed politically-charged changes to compensation and personnel policy as one of his top six priorities in reforming the military following the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as the department gears up to meet new challenges." Has our government went so far into Kool-Aid arena that it wants to take from the brave so the lazy won't be inconvenienced and renege on its promises to our troops? Why don't we take from the $172K salary of the US Congress instead, lets take their pork spending projects, or even better yet, lets take the entitlements from the ones who are too lazy to work! How about if we take from the $7 billion is foreign aid instead of stabbing our troops in the back.

"This may be the most difficult to achieve among his six priorities, Hagel said of proposals to trim pay increases, overhaul TRICARE and review retirement benefits while adapting to cuts in personnel." So our president and the democrats in congress would rather renege on the promises to the military who have already sacrificed their time, health, sanity, and in many cases their life to buy more votes for the democratic party from the lazy ones who are only for themselves and not helping the nation. This is so un-Patriotic to even suggest it, I have no words.

"Without serious attempts to achieve significant savings in this area, which consumes roughly half of the DoD budget and is increasing every year, we risk becoming an unbalanced force," Hagel said. Why don't you sacrifice the congressional retirements, health care, and budgets; oh yes that is right; you are not for helping the nation or honoring its defenders but for your own back pocket and reelection. You would rather give to the illegal, lazy, and elected then honoring your promises to our brave; just like President Obama's most anti-American statement, "the military should pay their own bills for war injuries, they knew what they were getting into", this statement in an honorable world, should mandate the instant removal of Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.

Hagel then said, "The alternative was to have a military that is well-compensated, but poorly trained and equipped, with limited readiness and capability." No the alternative is to pull the money from the lazy and drug laced to get them off their dead beat ass and make them work for a living. Our military has already paid for what they should receive and this is as un-American and un-Patriotic as I have ever seen; Calvin Coolidge quote is true and enlightening, "The nation which forgets its defenders will be itself forgotten."

The Affordable Care Act; or Is IT?

The problem with politics and agendas from any political party is trying to find out when they are telling the truth of ball face lying. President Obama said, "We will keep this promise, to the American people; if you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period; if you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan, period". We now know at this point 28.7% of the people have already been forced off their health care plan and most have lost their doctors due to the regulations in "The Affordable Care Act." President Obama also said, "their going to be able to go on a web site or call up a call center and sign up for affordable quality health insurance at a significantly cheaper rate then they can get right now on the individual market." Of the fifty states plus DC there was only three I didn't find data for; of the other 48, Colorado was the only state where health care plans went down. Even with Colorado figured in, the average plan for a person of age 27 would go up by 62.5% and age of 50 would go up by 23.3%; this is opposite of the significantly cheaper rate; especially in Arizona  where a 27 year old person's insurance premium will rise by 156.7%; talk about sticker shock. The rates are listed below but you need to ask yourself; is this significantly cheaper?

	Age 27				Age 50
States	Before	After	Change		Before	After	Change
Alabama	$165.00	$216.12	31.0%		285.00	368.31	22.6%
Alaska	$198.00	$341.58	72.5%		398.00	582.05	31.6%
Arizona	$102.00	$261.87	156.7%		315.00	446.24	29.4%
Arkansas	$105.00	$285.00	171.4%		215.00	385.00	44.2%
California	$174.00	$215.00	23.6%		225.00	255.00	11.8%
Colorado	$275.00	$192.35	-30.1%		330.00	245.00	-34.7%
Connecticut	$149.37	$245.27	64.2%		249.00	435.00	42.8%
Delaware	$129.35	$258.60	99.9%		267.00	440.71	39.4%
DC	$153.27	$155.00	1.1%		225.00	345.00	34.8%
Florida	$151.40	$264.45	74.7%		257.00	450.67	43.0%
Georgia	$98.12	$263.28	168.3%		263.00	448.69	41.4%
Hawaii	Unavailable Data
Idaho	$92.45	$172.35	86.4%		262.00	351.00	25.4%
Illinois	$116.45	$249.72	114.4%		298.00	425.56	30.0%
Indiana	$197.45	$264.77	34.1%		249.00	451.21	44.8%
Iowa	$205.00	$230.21	12.3%		347.00	392.32	11.6%
Kansas	$87.40	$200.14	129.0%		198.00	341.08	41.9%
Kentucky	Unavailable Data
Louisiana	$129.20	$266.38	106.2%		315.00	453.96	30.6%
Maine	$225.00	$282.59	25.6%		329.00	341.00	3.5%
Maryland	$129.00	$142.00	10.1%		243.00	275.00	11.6%
Massachusetts	Unavailable Data
Michigan	$117.30	$255.85	118.1%		305.00	436.01	30.0%
Minnesota	$106.00	$122.00	15.1%		216.00	265.00	18.5%
Mississippi	$163.00	$213.00	30.7%		364.00	500.00	27.2%
Missouri	$159.00	$244.06	53.5%		299.00	415.92	28.1%
Montana	$150.00	$213.80	42.5%		278.00	364.35	23.7%
Nebraska	$125.00	$213.34	70.7%		298.00	363.57	18.0%
Nevada	$168.00	$172.00	2.4%		297.00	445.00	33.3%
New Hampshire	$220.00	$221.71	0.8%		359.00	377.84	5.0%
New Jersey	$329.00	$319.00	-3.0%		550.00	544.20	-1.1%
New Mexico	$105.00	$189.00	80.0%		315.00	354.00	11.0%
New York	$500.00	$356.00	-28.8%		500.00	356.00	-40.4%
North Carolina	$135.00	$257.39	90.7%		364.00	438.64	17.0%
North Dakota	$116.00	$247.30	113.2%		215.00	421.44	49.0%
Ohio	$247.00	$243.12	-1.6%		421.00	414.32	-1.6%
Oklahoma	$135.00	$213.02	57.8%		298.00	363.02	17.9%
Oregon	$115.00	$178.20	55.0%		201.00	215.90	6.9%
Pennsylvania	$167.00	$220.36	32.0%		289.00	374.05	22.7%
Rhode Island	$285.00	$205.00	-28.1%		354.00	297.00	-19.2%
South Carolina	$205.00	$246.19	20.1%		315.00	419.56	24.9%
South Dakota	$159.00	$308.64	94.1%		305.00	525.99	42.0%
Tennessee	$135.00	$214.70	59.0%		278.00	365.90	24.0%
Texas	$115.00	$229.95	100.0%		205.00	391.88	47.7%
Utah	$126.00	$220.91	75.3%		268.00	338.04	20.7%
Vermont	$150.00	$366.00	144.0%		250.00	402.00	37.8%
Virginia	$165.00	$581.00	252.1%		278.00	991.03	71.9%
Washington	$124.00	$215.00	73.4%		314.00	355.00	11.5%
West Virginia	$215.00	$229.48	6.7%		259.00	391.07	33.8%
Wisconsin	$140.00	$277.91	98.5%		289.00	473.61	39.0%
Wyoming	$289.00	$364.95	26.3%		540.00	621.96	13.2%
			62.5%				23.3%

Were we lied to or were the ones estimating just this incompetent; I would just say this is like every other government program, inefficient, ill-regulated, and ran by incompetent people; everything seems to be far off the track. As I stated in "Update on the Truth about Obama Care" and "Is Obamacare Good or Bad and is it a Train Wreck Waiting to Happen?" I warned what was happening. First, all the experts say the site should have been $2 million max, not $600 million; second the web site wasn't set up for bid but awarded to a friend of the First Lady, this is known as a conflict of interest or was it another Solyndra; give them a massive amount of tax payer's money and they pony up contributions to your political party? First Lady Michelle Obama’s Princeton classmate is a top executive at the company that received the contract to build the failed Obamacare website according to the Daily Caller. According to the New York Times, the administration purposely delayed the announcement of some Obamacare rules until after the November election, so as to avoid giving the GOP political fodder, delaying the whole thing. If it wasn't ready, the responsible and professional action should have been to delay Obamacare; the responsible and professional direction for the web site should have been to get a web designer who was without conflicts of interest, but political prevaricating wins out again and we the people end up footing the bill.

This is why everything that can be should be in the private market and not ran by the government. The private market has always and will always be more efficient, on time, and correct then anything ran by the government; it's a fact of life. When you let politics and partialness get involved, we the people always loose. There are many who think the builders of the web site wanted it to fail to prevent the sticker shock people are now receiving; this just confirms they knew and lied.