Legislating the Destruction of Our Country

Legislation and regulations have gone too far in this country and we are loosing our freedom day by day. A wise man once said, "If you throw a frog into a bucket of boiling water it will jump out, but if you put a frog in a bucket of cold water and slowly turn up the heat, the frog will stay there and be cooked alive before it realizes what is happening." The ladder is what is happening to us in the US, when you have the government shutting down the motivation of our youth. When an 11 year old cupcake business because she does not have a separate kitchen in her house. Telling a girl, she can't sell mistletoe to raise money for her braces then directed to beg instead. When you tell a 4-year old, he cannot sell lemonade for 25¢ a cup because he does not have a vender’s license. This is just a few with kids but it goes on with adults as well. When a Pennsylvania town’s fines its citizens a $1,000-a-day for feeding the birds, I think the legislation and regulations have gone excessively far. These may seem like small fries but it gets much worse and the liberals are destroying jobs due to slowly removing our freedoms with their policies.

The Coal Industry when President Clinton took office to the time he left had a drop of 37% of all coal jobs due to regulations his administration implemented. Under G. W. Bush, it rose about 14% but since President Obama has taken over, it has dropped 7% and by his own words, he wants the coal industry gone. This will be a loss of 1.65 million American jobs. Of the top ten coal producing states, three have been in financial trouble and voted for Mr. Obama; your liberal politicians knew he was going to hurt you, the people of your state, your state revenue, and the state’s economy but they did not care, they only care for their agenda; not you. If your state does not produce coal, I am sure these federal regulations are hurting you somewhere else but as for you Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Colorado, you will now have to deal with the 1.65 million jobs lost accounting for $132 billion in taxable revenue and burdened with all the unemployment and welfare add-ons. Illinois, you did not just shoot yourself in the foot but the head; this is what voting liberal does for you; it bankrupts your state, your cities, and your people due to unsustainable spending; just ask California (close to bankruptcy) and Detroit. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says Obamacare will push 2 million workers out of labor market, I wonder why we are not recovering. By the way, if you calculate the unemployment rate with the actual true numbers, our unemployment rate is around 17%; yes, they lied to us again. The timber industry has lost 40, 000 jobs thanks to the mostly liberals Democrats and the liberal regulations. The north east fishing industry have already loss another 40,000 jobs due to these regulations put into place by this administration and these liberal politicians; oh wait, you keep voting for these Democratic and Republican liberals so you have no right to complain. Use your brain and think.

Maybe you should vote for the non-liberal Democrats or Republicans who are trying to create jobs instead of a group of liberal Democrats and Republicans who spend what they don't have, who just want to tax and regulate you more; what a concept. Depending on whose numbers you use (I like the CBO), this administrations implementation of far left liberal policies has cost us over 25 million jobs. According to the CBO, it will cost us 50-70 million more jobs or reduction in working hours. What was these politician’s answers to shorter work hours due to their policies, "Shorter working weeks for all will help to create a fairer economy” or “it will give you more time at home with your family." What they do not see (or do they) is it will make you loose 25% of your pay or you will have to work two jobs to make enough to survive, this will keep you away from home more.

The truth is most politicians, especially liberal politicians, Democrat or Republican are crooks. In the state of California, you have a train project that will not help a soul but bleed $1 Billion dollars from federal taxpayers (Pork Spending) and more from California taxpayers later when it is transferred over in a few years.  Guess what, it just happens Diane Feinstein's husband got the contract; amazing. Is not this at the minimum a conflict of interest? The liberal sponsors of minimum wage hike bill don't pay their own interns; I think we call that being hypocritical. AFSCME reports using thousands in taxpayer money to organize unions; liberals love unions and I know there are good and bad unions but taxpayers should not be footing a bill to organize any unions; I wonder how this got through congress. To top it off, National Security Adviser Susan Rice admitted she has no regrets over misleading the American public about the 2012 Benghazi terror attacks (right before the elections); she lied about the deaths of four American heroes so that President Obama could win the election; in Nancy Pelosi’s words, “By any means necessary”. I ran across a video of Judge Jeanine that should concern you about our power grid. Maybe instead of trains and bridges to nowhere costing Billions, we should fix our aging infrastructure. It would create jobs (just like the Keystone Pipeline) and help our country. Maybe they should relook at the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) signed by a liberal president. We could bring back previous US jobs sent to other countries by President Clinton when he signed it in 1994; you may like him, but this, along with removing tariffs is one thing he did that really hurt our people and the country.

What do you want from your country? As for those who have put their lives on the line for our defense, we now find out that while China and Russia is building up their militaries, President Obama and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is bringing ours down to below WWII levels. These cuts make up 50% of the Sequester, which the military currently only makes up 17% of the federal budget. Entitlements from both appropriated and non-appropriated funds make up over 65% of our expenditures and now we see these cuts to the military are to give out more entitlements according to the CBO. Which should they be cutting? It is the liberal Democrats attacking the military again, what a surprise; the only cuts being made in this time of massive spending by President Obama and the Democrats has been to the military, not one dollar has been reduced from entitlements. Ever since President Obama has taken over you have seen a very disturbing pattern of targeting. The military as shown above is always a target of the liberals but so are any military leaders who disagree with President Obama’s military objectives. President Obama is forcing out military leaders who refuse to promise to fire on US civilians; does this make you feel safe?

A filmmaker is targeted (who also directed Schindler’s List) for making an anti-Obama film “Obama 2016” (link to film on my site). Dinesh D'Souza donated more money then allowed to a candidate; it wouldn’t bother me so much except a large list of Democratic donors who have done the same thing with higher donations amounts are easily found but the government and Attorney General’s Office has refused to prosecute them (Can you say double standard?) Many conservative groups are still targeted by the IRS because they disagree with President Obama. I do not care if you are filing for non-profit from the left or the right but no administration, Democrat or Republican should be able to use the IRS, NSA, EPA, or any other government group to target their political enemies. This has been going on in the Obama Administration from day one, not only this but the president and Attorney General from day one have ignored the US Constitution; when Attorney General Eric Holder was questioned on how the president had the constitutional basis authority to use executive orders over the legislative branch (Congress), he could not explain. For your information and Eric Holder’s, executive orders only have authority in the executive branch, in other words, President Obama and Eric Holder know they are violating the US Constitution. The Democrats and Republicans in the legislative branch are either knowingly violating the US Constitution in unison with President Obama and Eric Holder or are too cowardly to stand up to them, maybe being afraid of being targeted. Eric Holder even told the state Attorney Generals that they did not have to follow the laws or Constitution in which they disagree. While we cut our military daily under this president, over a $100 Billion dollars was given to green energy companies. These companies donated $100 of million dollars to President Obama and the Democrats then immediately 80% of them went bankrupt; sounds like money laundering. I am sure all administrations are guilt of assigning people to “Ambassador” positions for their donations, but I have never seen such an open pay off and embezzlement of taxpayer’s money in my entire life so what oath did the president and attorney general take.

The Presidential Oath of Office

The oath to be taken by the president on first entering office is specified in Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

The Attorney General’s Oath of Office

I (Name) do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic that I will bear truth faith and allegiance to the same that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion and I well and faithfully perform the duty of the office on which I am about to enter so help me God.

No matter Democrat or Republican, Conservative or Liberal, President Obama and Eric Holder have not abided by their oath of office and have split this country into like no other two people in history. They are purposely letting Islamic terrorist threats into the US, and refusing to enforce laws on political and racial grounds, and we wonder why our nation is so divided. VP Joe Biden referring to voter ID requirements to stop voter fraud as hatred and racially motivated is a flat out lie. My state has voter ID and every race, ethnic group, gender, and sexual orientation is there voting; what it does stop is voter fraud. Why would the liberals not want to stop voter fraud (Nancy Pelosi again said, “Win by any means necessary”)? I think you should also have your fingerprint scanned with all the polling places linked so you can tell when someone when people vote several times and charge them with voter fraud. So what can be done?

You have Congressman Dave Camp trying to pass a bill that if anyone in the IRS or other agencies target and take official actions against people for political reasons, they will be terminated. This is a good first step, watch the vote and you will see the elected officials from both parties who don’t care for America or “We the People”, they will vote no. These are the ones you need to get rid of by voting them out of office. If you don't, soon we will have no rights.

Military Taking It On The Chin Again; Anti Military, the Democrat's Way

As I have said before, if you look at history and the military, every time Democrats become president they belittle, berate, diminish, and gut the military mostly to get to those who would never stand and defend our country because in all honesty I don't think most democrats would ever defend our country mainly because in the Senate, the House, and the Presidency they don't. Of the last few presidents, the only two who refused to even give two or three years in the military was President Obama and President Clinton, president Clinton managed to stay in college for nine years to avoid the draft; I'm not a real fan of President G. W. Bush but at lease he went into the Guard.

Under Republican presidents, our military decent pay raises to keep up with the cost of living which they don't receive from Democrats. At the end of 2008, military commissaries reported military personnel qualified, applied for, and received $31.1 M in food stamps; at the end of 2013 the amount has raised to $103.6 M in food stamps, a 333% raise; does this sound like the right way to go? And now the Obama administration is wanting to close all Military Commissaries. 

The Military commissary isn't the only benefit targeted, retired military pay for TriCare and receive appointments and treatment at military TriCare Service Centers, well that was until our president cut TriCare Service Centers so on 1 April, the retire military who's contract with the military promised this medical care are out on their butts; Thanks Mr. President for holding up the promises to our retired and wounded veterans. Do you think it can get worse; with our bias media, of course it can.

One thing that is burnt into my mind is the daily body counts the news (agree or disagree) plastered on the TV every night. I didn't have a problem even when President Bush left office and they pointed out that we had lost 575 troops under his tenor. Where are the reports now? Under President Obama's Rules of Engagement (rule set by the Commander and Chief) our military has been set up to die and enabled by the press. In 7 years President Bush lost and average of 82.1 troops a year; under President Obama we have lost 1540 troops, an average of 308 troops a year and we hear nothing from the news. President Obama has a 267.8% higher death rate then President Bush due to his Rules of Engagement and you hear nothing from the media; why? This shows two things; the news doesn't care about reporting the news unless it matches their politics. The main stream media is using what our Founding Fathers set up to be a Tool to Expose the Truth, as a political weapon for pushing the liberal agenda through; the truth, ethics, and integrity doesn't matter to the media anymore. Liberals hate the military so now that a liberal president is in office; who cares how many military dies! Its just like when a politician gets in trouble, if it's a Republican politician the media will repeat the story over and over ensuing you know they were a Republican referring to it many time during the story but when a Democratic politician is in trouble the won't say their party and will kill it as soon as possible. Freedom of press doesn't mean the freedom to mislead and use disinformation for political gains.

Our military should be honored and lifted up; not have their benefits and pay cut every chance the liberals get, especially not when you turn around and give it to people, who most of which wouldn't sacrifice anything for this country.  Calvin Coolidge said it best.

"The nation which forgets its defenders will  be itself forgotten." Calvin Coolidge

The Liberal Truth and Numbers

The Liberal Truth and Numbers

JFK, the hands down most recognizable Democrat, war hero, and a true American once said," Don’t ask what your country can do for you, ask instead what you can do for your country”; I wonder what he would think seeing how the liberal Democrats have destroyed the party he loved and have become one of the most anti-American group on earth only second to Muslim fanatics? Today most Democrats and many Republicans tell the people, "Ask not what you can do for your country, but what can you demand your country do for you"; this is the almighty cancer on America.

The third Monday in January is Martin Luther King Day and one of his famous quotes tell us something:

“Every man must decide whether he will walk in the light of creative altruism or in the darkness of destructive selfishness.”
― Martin Luther King Jr.

Today around 47% of the people in America are on some sort of entitlement, over 65% of our discretionary and non-discretionary fund goes toward these entitlements and if it is not reversed, it will bring our great nation down and those raping the working class for those entitlements will have no more free handouts; soon after this happens there will be chaos in the streets. The ones receiving these entitlements will now rise up because they will be starving and the ones who have worked for their share will be in a physical battle from these receivers of entitlements trying to physically take what the working class has because they will not be able to make it on their own ability. Does this seem like a fairy tale; I would have said yes 15 years ago but today I think we are headed this way. Our government is circumventing the US Constitution at every chance and it's not just the Democrats, but the Republicans as well. When you have people like Rep. Alvin Holmes, D-Montgomery Alabama stating on the Alabama House floor that he doesn’t like Clarence Thomas because “he’s married to a white woman.” and nothing is done; it shows just how prejudice the Democratic part has become. No action is taken by the law makers or the media if a Black state or federal  representative makes a racist comment from the liberal Democratic side and as MLK said:

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
― Martin Luther King Jr.

The hypocrisy is staggering just like long time Anti-Gun Advocate, Senator R.C. Soles of North Carolina who shot two intruders in his house with his pistol; if he was anti-gun, why did he have one? We have too many laws and they are crippling America and one at a time, removing our freedoms and rights.

“Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal.”
― Martin Luther King Jr.

Our biggest freedom and right is to be able to vote; why would anyone be against voter ID? Any group who would be would just be in it to enable elections to be fraud filled in the hope their party would win. In the second week of February 2014, a poll was taken on entitlements and what people think; 54% think there are too many with 20 % think there are too few; if you look at the breakout of the different questions and which group answered what, the numbers are shocking.

Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president?

Liberal 70% approve; Conservative 70% disapprove; White 64% disapprove; Black 84% approve; overall 42% approve and  53% disapprove. Regardless of what you think about how things are supposed to work, do you approve or disapprove of Barack Obama going around Congress and using executive orders? Liberal 63% approve; Conservative 78% disapprove; White 70% disapprove; Black 81% approve; overall 37% approve and  60% disapprove.

The reason I put this in there is to ask a question; Why such a stark contrast? Are the blacks  and liberals on Mr. Obama's side just because he is a black liberal no matter how much he destroys the country? Is it because there is a higher majority of the liberal and black race in America are on entitlements and not in the working class? Now you have liberals of all races and genders and they have major flaws in their theology; it allows them to violate the US Constitution when it becomes inconvenient. The President of the United States takes an oath of office:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

—Presidential oath of office, Article II, Section 1, United States Constitution

Would our president openly and defiantly refuse to obey the US Constitution? President Obama said, "I have to enforce the law" during the election which is required by the US Constitution. President Obama said, "If congress passes a law it is our duty to enforce the law." in an interview on CNN. According to the constitution only congress has the authority to amend or repeal a law, the president can only sign it, refuse to sign it (where it becomes law automatically), or veto it. President Obama said he won't challenge state laws on the federal marijuana laws but he does on securing our boarders; isn't this being hypocritical or enforcing only the laws you like? The Black Panthers were blocking and intimidating voters in Philly, the US Justice Department said it was a slam dunk case yet Attorney General Eric Holder refused to prosecute and his policy is to not enforce against minority groups; isn't this discrimination? It doesn't matter if you are black, white or any other race, the law is there to protect us equally.

This is a repeat of history except instead of it being President Obama and the Democrats, it was President Nixon and the Republicans. Today, as in the President Nixon's reign, I can show you many facts showing the liberal policies are hurting America, taking us from one of the top 5 free nations in the world to 14th in world economic freedom. The U.S. under President Obama, who once promised to run the “most transparent” administration in the country’s history, fell from 32nd to 46th in the 2014 World Press Freedom Index, a drop of 13 slots. President Obama's administration have directed the police not to arrest law breakers; this violate the Presidential oath. Reverend King would be rolling over in his grave if he seen what was going on today.

“I have a dream that one day little black boys and girls will be holding hands with little white boys and girls.”
― Martin Luther King Jr.

“He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.”
― Martin Luther King Jr.

The truth is the liberal way never decreases the income gap as shown by it increasing under President Obama's reign; it never shows anyone how to lift themselves out of a bad situation yet intentionally gives them incentives to stay there, it is the liberal politicians from both the Democrats and the Republicans

Under Franklin D. Roosevelt, the wealthy went from 1 % to 11 percent. Meanwhile, the bottom 90 % rose to 67 %; during the '50s, '60s, and early '70s, decades of economic growth brought prosperity for all in the US.  Then in the late 1970s the liberal agenda started taking effect in California and Detroit and then came the liberal President Carter, the top 1 % saw their share begin to rise and the bottom 90 % saw theirs begin to fall and the nation went into a recession. After President Regan took over the economy and income gap started decreasing and did so until ultra liberal President Obama. The number dramatically increased since President Obama's inauguration in 2009, by 2012 the top 1 % was back where they were decades ago and the bottom 90 % fell below 50 %, the first time in US history. So ask yourself, "Is voting for these liberal politicians like John McCain and Nancy Pelosi really helping close the income gap, maintain our freedom, or our world standing?" No!

America is in Trouble

Everyone makes mistakes; when I find I have made a mistake, I like most people I will apologize and try to do better. If people working for me who make a mistake I tell them to do better next time but people who purposely do what they know is wrong, I fire them or at the minimum take away their responsibility and suspend them. I like to believe this is the norm in America; it is how we should act and should be the standards for our elected and appointed officials. We are in big trouble because our officials purposely lie and do not believe in the US Constitution and now we have without a doubt a Supreme Court Justice who does not believe in the rule of law.

When you have a Supreme Court Justice nominee with a history of racist remarks, they should never get a second look. I do not care what race they are or gender; when any political party select racist justices, all it does is divide the country and destroys the integrity of the highest court in the land. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor should have never been presented and should have been disbarred as a judge for her remarks, let alone elected to the US Supreme Court. She was put into this position by the liberal, socialist audience for a specific reason; she doesn’t believe in the US Constitution “White Man’s Law” and it is the best position and place for her to change it. The Supreme Court. These are some of her quotes:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male.”

“For jurists who are women and nonwhite, our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.”

“Personal experiences affect the facts that judges choose to see,”

"I want to be perfectly clear about this next comment so that there is no mistaking my words to mean something other than what they plainly say: the time has come to end white male oppression by castrating every white male until they are no longer dominant in Western culture. That means forcible removal of their testicles. I realize the brutality of my comment, and I don’t know how to say it more clearly."

And our elected officials failed us by letting her be appointed to the highest court in the land. Now she has stated that calling a “criminal” a “criminal” is insulting. This is really about race and not if someone is a criminal, our “wise Latina woman” does not want her ethnic brothers and sisters who are breaking US law (along with all other races who do the same) by being illegally in our country being called what they are “CRIMINALS”. This is the entitlement states of America coming now to illegal alien criminals via the US Supreme Court. Judges are to interpret the law, not ignore it due to their race or gender; if that were true, we would have never had women or minorities being allowed to vote. What you need to realize is it is just as much President Obama’s, Harry Reid’s, Olympia Snow’s, Barbra Boxer’s, Lindsey Graham’s, and Dianne Feinstein’s fault for voting a racist, sexist judge (by her own omissions and quotes). They voted her into the US Supreme Court knowing this about her instead of protecting the US Constitution they are sworn to uphold; the only surprise here is John McCain didn’t vote for her.

To add fire to the flame, after people were confirmed as targeted by the IRS our “honest and respectable” president comes on the TV and says there wasn’t “one smidgen” of corruption at the IRS. Now President Obama and the Democrats are wanting to give amnesty and US citizenship to terrorist who helped kill American soldiers; doesn't something seem wrong here? Another thing, if you go to the Bureau of Labor Statistics and look at the total number of people who are unemployed, no longer looking for employment, and not in labor force and take the total number of people employed the actual rate is around 25%; I wonder who's fault that is since nothing is ever President Obama's fault. Russia and China has ramped up their military spending while this White House guts our military again to give more to those who refuse to work.

Here is something to look at; look at how many Congressional elected Democrats who have voted without following the will of their constituents with this president on  all his policies which are destroying the US, who are now trying to distance themselves from him because it is an election year. Don't forget, everyone of them voted for the Obamacare bill without looking at it or reading it; in hte military that would be called "Dereliction of Duty" and you would be removed; I think that is what we need to do here.

I wonder why we are having so much trouble in our country.

How the EPA FDA and IRS are Screwing and Murdering the American People

What could help America with our jobs and energy problem? One thing would be the Keystone XL pipeline, but now we find that the agency who is suppose to be regulating in good faith, the EPA, is in fact sabotaging many programs and companies who could bring us jobs. I believe we need to protect the environment and EPA has often been accused  of listening to the "environmental groups", many who are very radical and are not here to protect but they are here to destroy; the ELF (Earth Liberation Force) group comes to mind, they have destroyed peoples property and murdered people due to their beliefs. I have always tried to believe that the EPA would have nothing to do with these type groups but after emails were obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request from the Energy and Environment Legal Institute, I found I was wrong.

The E-mails obtained under reveal that the EPA had conspired with many environmental groups to kill the Canada to Texas Keystone XL pipeline to ensure it wouldn't materialize no matter how many jobs (in the tens of thousands) it would create or if it was perfectly safe and at current, President Obama has rejected the project. Could this just be a fluke; maybe you should ask the farmers and business owners in San Joaquin Valley California this question. The Valley has to pay a $29 million federal penalty or close enough businesses and farms to meet an law not passed by congress but the EPA. So you can pay money and still stay open even if the EPA says you failed the standard. It sounds more like EPA extortion then environmental protection; if it was an environmental problem and they cared about our safety, wouldn't they just shut them down? California leads the nation on using the EPA to extort money or shut down farms and business; California currently is in a deep depression and leads the nation in unemployment. I think California's crooked liberal politicians and practices and have shown the rest of the nation what not to do; but will we learn from their mistakes?

The FDA is just as bad if not worse because instead of destroying a person's livelihood, they are accurately committing murder for money. Murder-the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. The people in the leadership of the FDA have purposely committed murder on the American public.

For around 30 years life-saving medications for cancer and other ailments are not approved by the FDA. Many of these drugs have been identified by the Life Extension Group as "life-saving medications that languished too long in the FDA’s archaic approval process." The delay in these drugs cause needless human suffering and death; why would this happen for drugs which cure diseases? Many of these drugs have been developed in other countries or by small pharmaceutical, not the big players and the big boys. The drugs developed by the big boys which are approved can exceed an out of pocket cost of $12,000 per month; many patients choose to die instead of bankrupting their loved ones. The FDA says the drugs developed in other countries or by small pharmaceutical may not be safe; so dyeing is safe? Most doctors and people know it is because the big pharmaceutical companied have the FDA in their back pocket and they make trillions of treating people; if they cure them they loose all those profits. If we give them the benefit of doubt we can say this is just a perceived response from people who don't know; I then ask what about RU 468 (The Morning After Pill). It was made by one of the "Big Boys and during a 10-year trial period, the Food and Drug Administration reported 458 deaths and 26,000 hospitalizations from taking RU 468 but the FDA approved it and let it remain on the market; why? If you research it, it is obvious and why I say "the leadership of the FDA have purposely committed murder on the American public", can you disagree?

We have all watched as the IRS has been caught in scandal after scandal yet no one has been fired and none of the witnesses interviewed. President Obama said in words it was reprehensible but his actions and that of his US Attorney General says the opposite. If you look, the groups targeted were conservative and any non-conservative groups against Obama. US Attorney General Eric Holder assigned DOJ trial attorney Barbara Bosserman to run the investigation but there is a problem here, Ms. Bosserman was a major Obama donor and a hardened anti-conservative activist; does anyone see the folly here. Reports show the investigation will likely file no criminal charges; isn't targeting people on race, religion, sexual orientation, or political beliefs against federal law? Yes, so why will there not be any charges filed? Of the people poled, 70% believe they need a Special Council to be appointed and according to the standard, this situation has rose to this level; so why hasn't US Attorney General Eric Holder assigned a Special Council; I just ask, who gave them their marching orders? Think about it, these are the same people who will have all your medical information; will they target you?