What could help America with our jobs and energy
problem? One thing would be the Keystone XL pipeline, but now we find that the
agency who is suppose to be regulating in good faith, the EPA, is in fact
sabotaging many programs and companies who could bring us jobs. I believe we
need to protect the environment and EPA has often been accused of listening to the "environmental
groups", many who are very radical and are not here to protect but they
are here to destroy; the ELF (Earth Liberation Force) group comes to mind, they
have destroyed peoples property and murdered people due to their beliefs. I
have always tried to believe that the EPA would have nothing to do with these
type groups but after emails were obtained
under a Freedom of Information Act request from the Energy and Environment
Legal Institute, I found I was wrong.
The E-mails obtained under reveal that the EPA had
conspired with many environmental groups to kill the Canada to Texas Keystone
XL pipeline to ensure it wouldn't materialize no matter how many jobs (in the
tens of thousands) it would create or if it was perfectly safe and at current,
President Obama has rejected the project. Could this just be a fluke; maybe you
should ask the farmers and business owners in San
Joaquin Valley California this question. The Valley has to pay a $29
million federal penalty or close enough businesses and farms to meet an law not
passed by congress but the EPA. So you can pay money and still stay open even
if the EPA says you failed the standard. It sounds more like EPA extortion then
environmental protection; if it was an environmental problem and they cared
about our safety, wouldn't they just shut them down? California
leads the nation on using the EPA to extort money or shut down farms and
business; California
currently is in a deep depression and leads the nation in unemployment. I think
California's crooked
liberal politicians and practices and have shown the rest of the nation what
not to do; but will we learn from their mistakes?
The FDA is just as bad if not worse because instead of
destroying a person's livelihood, they are accurately committing murder for
money. Murder-the unlawful premeditated killing of
one human being
by another. The people in the leadership
of the FDA have purposely committed murder on the American public.
For around 30 years life-saving medications for cancer and
other ailments are not approved by the FDA. Many of these drugs have been
identified by the Life
Extension Group as "life-saving medications that languished too long
in the FDA’s archaic approval process." The delay in these drugs cause
needless human suffering and death; why would this happen for drugs which cure
diseases? Many of these drugs have been developed in other countries or by
small pharmaceutical, not the big players and the big boys. The drugs developed
by the big boys which are approved can exceed an out of pocket cost of $12,000 per month; many
patients choose to die instead of bankrupting their loved ones. The FDA says
the drugs developed in other countries or by small
pharmaceutical may not be safe; so dyeing is safe? Most doctors and people know it is
because the big pharmaceutical companied have the FDA in their
back pocket and they make trillions of treating people; if they cure them they
loose all those profits. If we give them the benefit of doubt we can say this is just a perceived
response from people who don't know; I then ask what about RU
468 (The Morning After Pill). It was made by one of the "Big Boys and during
a 10-year trial period, the Food and Drug Administration reported 458 deaths and 26,000 hospitalizations
from taking RU 468 but the FDA approved it and let it remain on the market;
why? If you research it, it is obvious and why I say "the
leadership of the FDA have purposely committed murder on the American
public", can you disagree?
We have all watched as the IRS has been
caught in scandal after scandal yet no one has been fired and none of the
witnesses interviewed. President Obama said in words it was reprehensible but
his actions and that of his US Attorney General says the opposite. If you look,
the groups targeted were conservative and any non-conservative groups
against Obama. US Attorney
General Eric Holder assigned DOJ trial attorney Barbara Bosserman to run
the investigation but there is a problem here, Ms. Bosserman was a major Obama donor and a hardened anti-conservative activist; does
anyone see the folly here. Reports show the investigation will likely file no
criminal charges; isn't targeting people on race, religion, sexual orientation,
or political beliefs against federal law? Yes, so why will there not be any
charges filed? Of the people poled, 70% believe they need a Special Council to
be appointed and according to the standard, this situation has rose to this
level; so why hasn't US Attorney General Eric Holder assigned a Special
Council; I just ask, who gave them their marching orders? Think about it, these
are the same people who will have all your medical information; will they
target you?
No comments:
Post a Comment