Muslim Million Man March; What is the Truth Behind It





Everything I’m going to tell you is strait off the America Muslim Political Action Committee (AMPAC) website and I believe we should take them at their word. AMPAC is calling this the "MAMAF - Million American March Against Fear", if you come to America and integrate there is no reason to have fear; if you don’t then America is the ones who should have fear from what we have seen in other nations.

The FAQ on their site should raise your eye brows. The first question “Why another organization?” and points to several other organizations including CAIR (Council on American–Islamic Relations) which the FBI broke ties with because of their financing and connections to terrorist organizations. AMPAC was formed because CAIR wasn’t radical enough?

Let’s read further; “What are “the views and values of Muslims?” One of the answers was, “Making sure that the views and values of Muslims help make policy in America.” On their home page about 2/3rds of the way down it says “To this day every media outlet and anti Islamic organization has committed slanderous and libel statements against us as Muslims and our religion of Islam.” You need to realize if you say anything negative about the Muslim religion, true or not, it is considered “slanderous and libel statements”. Here you need to ask yourself a question, “Do I believe in my right to free speech?” If you are truly honest, the “views and values of Muslims” will stop this freedom and with their “Sharia Law” in place you can be put to death for blasphemy.

The next question, “What are “the views and values of Muslims?” Aren't Muslims diverse in their political views? The state they will focus on, “that the “war on terror” is a hoax and that the official story of 9/11 is not true”. I guess the 3,000 people who died, including Muslims working, are at home now; this is almost word for word what is found on the Al-Qaida web site.  

“Aren't some of these views too “radical”?” Their answer is frightening, “The history of the Jewish-Zionist lobby AIPAC shows that it is more effective to be “radical” and express one's views strongly and honestly, than to be fearful and timid. The best defense is a good offense.” This is right off their website, I am 100% for freedom of speech but radical Islam uses action; if America keeps being passive with these types of organizations we will cease to exist.

Let’s go back to their home page where AMPAC (talking about 9/11) says”These lies told to the American population has made it impossible for us to do true Dawa.” What is Dawa? It means their true call, the Muslim religion’s true call is to force everyone to become Muslim, slaves, or kill them. Quran Chapter 47-4, “Muhammad Sarwar: If you encounter the disbelievers in a battle, strike-off their heads.” Here is another question; Will you do battle for your and your child’s freedom? Back to their web Page, “Why do we have to defend our religion while doing Dawa? Why can’t we just share the perfection of the Quran and the beauty of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (SWS)?” I think this tells us a boatload about what AMPAC is about and it isn’t about integrating their culture into the American way. One of their more vocal members says there hasn’t been a Muslim attack on the US sense 9/11; if you go read “Muslim in America; The Most Humanistic, Tolerant, and Morally Great?” the FBI has pointed out dozens of attacks by Radical Muslims on US soil including the Ft Hood Shooting.

So why organize a Muslim march on 9/11 knowing it will upset millions of Americans and open many wounds suffered during the 9/11 attacks if you are for building relationships and promoting a good Muslim image? It is because they are not for these, their Mission Statement says it is all and only about being political and changing America to the Muslim view, but there is something else here that many Americans may not realize. In the Islamic community, when you win a battle you march on the anniversary of the battle as a sign of victory and you build a Mosque or religious build on the site (usually on a Church or Synagogue) to remind anyone passing it of your victory and power; this is known as a “Victory Mosque.” If you doubt me you can go to Bari mosque in India, Umayyad Mosque in Damascus, Asqa Mosque in Hague, and many others spread throughout the world. If you are Muslim and devout to the Quran and follow it, you will follow these verses as is says in the Quran:

Quran 3:28, “Let not the believers (Muslims) take the unbelievers for friends, or their companions instead for the believers (Muslims): if someone does, then you have no contact with Allah.”

So the Muslim religion says they cannot be friends with any non-Muslims.

Quran 5:50, “Do they, perchance, desire [to be ruled by] the law of pagan ignorance? But for people who have inner certainty, who could be a better law-giver than God?

So the Muslim religion says do not follow our laws.

Quran 2:39 but those who are bent on denying the truth and giving the lie to Our messages - they are destined for the fire, and therein shall they abide.

The Muslim religion says if you don’t believe you are destine to Hell.

Quran 9:5, “When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful.”

And the Muslim religion says if you don’t convert we will murder you and send you to Hell.
 

Many Muslims do not accept the literal translation of the Quran and actually would be put to death in many Muslim ran countries but they are not the problem. More Muslims then not do take the verses in the Quran literal and do act on this premise. The purpose of the Muslim religion is to rule the world, it is written in the Quran, ask a Muslim and they will tell you. We need to wake up and see the truth behind groups like AMPAC, there are many innocent Americans and Muslims who will suffer by their hands because once again our government sticks to the “Political Correctness” them and won’t act. It caused 9/11, it caused Fort Hood shooting, and it will cause more deaths in our future.

Is President Obama For or Against Veterans and the Military?





There is one group of people who sacrifice more then many will ever know. In your family and political groups, no matter what they are, you have had the military and military veterans who have fought in wars, popular or unpopular who ask for very little. The media has a way of using them as pons when it suites their needs pointing out the injuries and deaths suffered every day if they don’t like the president and ignoring the casualties if they do like the president. The politicians always use them as backdrops for photo ops to show they are patriotic. Under President Obama’s watch, over 2/3rd (skip to 1:20) of all casualties in Afghanistan have occurred but the media doesn’t report it, they love him. This is war and President Obama is not guilty of their deaths just as President Bush was not guilty for the other 1/3rd which happened under his watch. This was just to show you the bias of our media.

The real and only question we should have is “Is President Obama for or against our military?” What are the promises he has made to the military and veterans and does his actions match his words?

  1. President Obama promises not to try and balance the budget on the back of the military and veterans says taking care of them is a moral obligation.
The budget, as you seen in the above video he gives his word to veterans that he will not let the budget be balanced on the back of the military and veterans but now President Obama is going to make the troops and retirees pay 300% more for health insurance while unions get a 0% hike (skip to 2:00).

  1. President Obama says the government will pay for war veteran’s collage tuition (skip to 2:30).
It was reported by Bill Briggs, NBC News contributor, “Student veterans hired by the Department of Veterans Affairs to help fellow ex-service members transition into college have routinely waited four to six weeks — and, in one case, four months — for unpaid wages, prompting eviction worries and mounting debt, according to a survey of program members obtained by NBC News.” I guess this one has also slipped by the side.

  1. President Obama promises veterans as he left for vacation, he will shrink the claims backlog and that it has already started shrinking and that his new law won't change their VA coverage.
This site shows an increase from 273 days on average to receive claims to between 316 and 327 days in 2013. I’ll give President Obama an “A” for placing money there but like I have always said, “you can through money at a problem all day but until you fix the problem you have only wasted more money.”

  1. President Obama promises more aid for wounded veterans. I have been around for a while and like the old phrase, “trust be verify”. First we will look and see if President Obama has kept his promises to veterans and then we will look at the state of the military and its advancements sense President Obama has taken the reins. 
Once again I’ll give President Obama an “A” for placing money there but again, you can through money at a problem all day but until you fix the problem you have only wasted more money. The problem is this is the liberal mind set. You can through more money at education, unemployment, welfare, and anything else you want but until you fix the problem, it will remain the same. Once you fix the problem and make it efficient, you will not need as much money. It wouldn’t have mattered if it was President Obama or a republican president; you must first fix the problem.

What about out military preparedness? This is from CNN, "Washington (CNN) -- President Barack Obama unveiled his administration's plan Thursday for a leaner, cheaper military, a reflection of Washington's fiscal belt-tightening and slower national economic growth. The president insisted the new strategy -- which eliminates the military's ability to actively fight two major wars at once -- will allow U.S. armed forces to effectively combat terrorism while confronting any new threats from countries like China and Iran." This is making us weaker and more vulnerable.

  1. President Obama has often stated that he is 100% behind the troops; after the Fort Hood shooting he said he would do all he could; did he?
If this was true, he would have classified the Fort Hood shooting as a terrorist act as it was just like the Pentagon, the Twin Towers, and the crash in the Pennsylvania field were. The troops at Fort Hood were betrayed by the intelligence community and President Obama. The intelligence community new Major Hassan had been radicalized and had been in contact with known terrorist. Major Hasan’s sent 10 to 20 messages to Anwar al-Awlaki, a known Al-Qaida terrorist and once a spiritual leader at a mosque in suburban Virginia where Major Hasan worshiped as reported by the New York Times. They were betrayed by President Obama because the refusal to classify this as a terrorist act due to political correctness which is destroying this great nation. 

  1. Will President Obama ever try and use the military or government branches in an unethical way against the US citizens?
It is being reported by a Boston TV station that President Obama has a new litmus test for all top generals in the military, “Will you fire on US civilians?” If this is true it is frightening. I wonder if this has anything to do with Homeland Security stating that anti-immigration people, Pro-Gun people, Veterans, and Anti Abortionists are Terrorists. If this isn’t trying to shut you opponents up I don’t know what is; yes it is not only unethical but a violation of the US Constitution. You may say, "but this is Homeland Security, not President Obama." Who put the Secretary of Homeland Security into office; President Obama. After this came to light, did he remove them from this position; no, and he has even praised the job they were doing. This is anti_American.

To me I don’t see President Obama for the military or veterans, if he was he wouldn’t be hurting the military and veterans who live, bleed, and die for our country while giving people who refuse to work any benefit they want. Actions speak louder then words and you should never listen to what any politician says (Democrat or Republican) but examine their actions.

Surveillance Nation; Is Amendment IV Gone?





Before we start we need to first refresh ourselves on what gives us the rights and freedoms that today is being eroded by power hungry and anti-American politicians. The three documents which all true Americans should hold close and keep from being perverted is The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and The Bill of Rights. Even though many Americans as I hold these documents sacred and believe they should be followed, many politicians from all parties do not believe the same. They ignore and circumvent our founding documents to gain power and political status and now the Amendment IV is under attack. They want more information because information is power and the more they have on you, the more power they have over you, the more they can control you.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

I wrote an article in March of this year “Drones in America” telling exactly what the capability was of drones. To me it highlights the largest violation of Amendment IV because with a drone overhead nothing you do or say is ever in private. The problem is, no one does research anymore so let me bring you up on the original H. R. 3162 (The Patriot Act) signed October 24, 2001

Sec. 210. Scope of Subpoenas for Records of Electronic Communications.

Sec. 2702. Voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records

(c) EXCEPTIONS FOR DISCLOSURE OF CUSTOMER RECORDS- A provider described in subsection (a) may divulge a record or other information pertaining to a subscriber to or customer of such service (not including the contents of communications

(3) as may be necessarily incident to the rendition of the service or to the protection of the rights or property of the provider of that service;

(4) to a governmental entity, if the provider reasonably believes that an emergency involving immediate danger of death or serious physical injury to any person justifies disclosure of the information; or

(5) to any person other than a governmental entity.'.

So the provider only gives government access if “the provider reasonably believes that an emergency”; lets read further.

Sec. 219. Single-Jurisdiction Search Warrants for Terrorism.

Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is amended by inserting after `executed' the following: `and (3) in an investigation of domestic terrorism or international terrorism (as defined in section 2331 of title 18, United States Code), by a Federal magistrate judge in any district in which activities related to the terrorism may have occurred, for a search of property or for a person within or outside the district'.

So warrants on people can only be issued for “domestic terrorism or international terrorism”; Lets keep reading.

Sec. 223. Civil Liability for Certain Unauthorized Disclosures.

(g) Improper Disclosure is Violation- Any willful disclosure or use by an investigative or law enforcement officer or governmental entity of information beyond the extent permitted by section 2517 is a violation of this chapter for purposes of section 2520(a).

Didn’t this happen during the 2012 election where information was leaked on a candidate which could have only come from this type surveillance? Yes, it did.

  1. Case 1Toledo City Council candidate, Kevin Milliken had his information leaked so it’s in the city races. 
  2. Case 2- Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell had her records leaked so it’s in the Senate races. 
  3. Case 3One of President Barack Obama's re-election campaign co-chairmen used a leaked document from the IRS to attack GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney so it’s even in the Presidential races.

Now the last one was done by the Presidents people on an opposite party Presidential Candidate. I didn’t care for Mr. Romney and you may be asking; what does the IRS have to do with Federal Surveillance. If you read the article you will find out the IRS secretly used DEA surveillance database to launch its investigations; now you can see the connection. If any party sitting in office can use this tactic to get dirt or perceived dirt on their opponents, they can fort a fair election as may be the tale of Mr. Romney. Now we have the NSA surveillance casting wider net on e-mails and texts which is a direct violation of Amendment IV and the original “Patriot Act”; they can't do this with written mail so how can they get away with it with our e-mails and texts.

On May 26, 2011 the Patriot Act was extended but also changed from the original. On the day on the floor of the Senate, before the Patriot Act was extended, Sen. Ron Wyden said: “I want to deliver a warning this afternoon: When the American people find out how their government has secretly interpreted the Patriot Act, they will be stunned and they will be angry.” He was right and we are. This administration’s and congresses changes to the Patriot Act redefined terrorism so broadly, many non-terrorist political activities such as protest marches, demonstrations, and civil disobedience are now considered potential terrorist acts. This makes anyone desiring to engage in a march to protect any Constitutional Amendment or freedom in expressive activities as possible domestic terrorist and suspects of the surveillance state.

I don’t trust any of our politicians and it wasn’t always this way. Our current president and congress many times has said they were against violations of privacy; if this was so then as a senator, why is our now president supported it along with half the people in Congress and why was it changed under his watch? A even better question is why is President Obama still supporting this massive intrusion into our privacy?

I can sit here all day and rip the Democrats and Republicans for all the lies and deceitfulness both parties have shoved in the face of the US people. The only thing that can fix it is voting them out of office; McCain, Pelosi, Feinstein, Reid, and McConnell just to name a few; we need to get people back into office that care about our country, not their pocket books and special interest groups. If we don’t surveillance will be the lease of our worries.

A Radical Islamic Nuclear War on Obama’s Watch?





Today the mindset is much different compared to the 1940s and it’s not all for the good. In the 1940s, 95% of the people had a work ethic, loved our country, and would fight if any tried to trample our freedoms; we were strong. Unfortunately today many want everything given to them and have no work ethic, love themselves, hate our country, and if we needed them to fight an invader they would run, causing us to lose every freedom for which many men and women have died. In 1940 we stood for what was right, stopped the slaughter of millions of Jewish people and ended World War II; we did it with the invention of a double edge sword, the nuclear bomb. Since World War II we have had several more wars but none as destructive or generating the civilian lose of life as in World War II, but that may soon change. Today we present an image of corruptness and weakness with a new scandal every day showing the government once again violating the constitution with few standing against it. To most countries at war you target the military components, not the civilians, the war we were drawn into and fight today purposefully targets civilians, the war with Radical Islam.   

We have watched as Israel trades blows with Hamas and Hezbollah sometimes daily. Most media will not define the differences in the attacks, Israel bombs a Police Station (Hamas’ and Hezbollah’s military) while Hamas and Hezbollah bombs Israeli school buses. I know Israel isn’t innocent in every case but their primary target isn’t the school buses either. We have known for years that sanctions do nothing to deter rouge regimes like North Korea and Iran from anything, they ignore sanctions and the only ones who pay are their citizens; countries like China and Russia will always circumvent any sanctions imposed. We have known this yet our government still believes it will work no matter how much it has failed throughout our history. Iran has successfully has built a nuclear bomb with the help of Russia and North Korea and has enough weapons-grade uranium and plutonium for more, according to a source in the Revolutionary Guards intelligence unit. Iran has built a new site in a mountain which is bomb proof and forbid entrance by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Iran has built a previously undisclosed launching site and space center near the northeastern city of Shahrud according to the New York Times which is in range of Israel. We have listened to the Iranian leadership boast that their sole purpose is to wipe the Israeli people from the face of the earth. With our lack of leadership and fortitude, our leadership has failed American, Israeli, and world people and the Israeli people will be the ones who pay.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel reminds the world (in case anyone had forgotten) that the threat from Iran remains very much alive. Netanyahu warned that the Islamic Republic is once again approaching a nuclear red line, and hinted that if the United States doesn’t take action soon, he will. If Iran fires a nuclear missile into Israel, no matter if it explodes or not Iran will be wiped from the face of the earth; if someone fired a nuclear missile into the US we (under a strong administration) would do the same. If this happens, with Russia and China being Iran’s comrades it could lead to the beginning of World War III; since we back Israel will this cause the Chinese to try and now forcibly take Taiwan which has been in dispute for decades? Will China or Russia try to retaliate against Israel and will we step in to stop it?

USA Today has President Obama addressing the Iranian Leadership, "If we can, the Iranian people will begin to see the benefits of greater trade and ties with other nations, including the United States," Obama said. "Whereas if the Iranian government continues down its current path, it will only further isolate Iran. This is the choice now before Iran's leaders." President Obama needs to realize they are not isolated, Russia and China gives them anything they want. He also needs to realize they have a third choice; nuke Israel and I think they are crazy enough to do it. Most sane people would avoid nuclear war but with Iran however, the matter is different. The reason is that the place has many fanatics who want to die and go to heaven to see their 72 virgins and usher in the 13th Imam.

If this happens will the other Islamic countries stay out of the fight or will they join forces with Iran to wipe Israel from the map? Instead of Iran directly attacking Israel will it get a nuclear bomb to Hamas or Hezbollah and let them do their dirty work? And with our borders like an open gate, will we wake up one morning to find Dallas, New York, Chicago, or Los Angles gone from a terrorist nuclear attack? President Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., and Obama were all to secure the border, none have. Japan has been the only nation to endure a nuclear attack but if things don’t change Israel will be next and we may not be far behind.

Is Obamacare Good or Bad and is it a Train Wreck Waiting to Happen?




What does HR 4872 (Obamacare) actually do to help or hurt us? In the beginning we had Senator Pelosi says “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it”; it is the most irresponsible acts I have ever heard or seen come from our congress. With senators not allowed time to read the thousands of Obamacare, they were pocked, prodded, and bribed to pass it. With thousands of pages in this bill, without any debate or reading of the bill by the congress, we shouldn’t be surprised at if it doesn’t stand up to what our president and senators promises. The senators should have been given time to read it before voting on it and all the backroom under the table deals should have been stopped; if it was a good bill it would pass. So what is in the bill to make even Democrats senators today say it is a training wreck? Let’s start off and see which rumors are true and which ones are false.

Is Obama Care Unconstitutional? It is except the Supreme Court changed it from a mandate to a tax. Sense it was changed from its foundation it should have gone back to the senate and voted on as a tax. President Obama even said it was unconstitutional in this clip (skip to about 1:12 to bypass the entire intro).

Obama said, “Your Premiums Will Go Down Under Obamacare”. Is it the truth or another politician lying? Then Obama’s says after everything is passed that premiums will go up and he blames the small business owners. The unions supported Obamacare because like the idiots we have in congress, they didn’t read it before backing it and now it is coming back to bite them in the butt. If your pay goes up 1$ you may have to pay $9,355 hike in your annual premiums. I would Mr. Obama was not truthful about premiums; like politicians on both sides, he lied to get what he wanted and now we have to pay for it. Forbes Magazine says, “Obama Care to Increase Insurance Premiums 64%-146%!”

Will pre-existing conditions be covered for everyone who needs it? No, a pre-existing condition health insurance program established by Obamacare is already straining its own budget. To control costs, the administration’s Health and Human Services Department (HHS) has stopped enrolling any new people in the program. “Due to growing concerns about the rate of PCIP [Pre-existing Condition Insurance Program] spending, in February 2013, CCIIO [under HHS] suspended PCIP enrollment to ensure the appropriated funding would be sufficient to cover claims for current enrollees through the end of the program,” states the GAO report, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Enrollment and Spending in the Early Retiree Reinsurance and Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan Programs. The rationing or denial of health care coverage in the marketplace for people with pre-existing conditions, or insurers charging higher premiums to people with pre-existing conditions were among the reasons cited by President Barack Obama and most congressional Democrats for implementing Obamacare, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. See this video.

Will we get to keep our current health care plan? President Obama said yes but the truth is only some specific union can and won’t loose their grand father status. If any other company changes anything in their current plan, they loose their grandfather status. Does this sound fair to you?

Are microchips are implanted? Up until the senate passed the final version, there was a mandate for a GPS traceable microchip to be force on every person. The final version did “remove” the microchip but as the previous section video showed you, if they want to amend it, they can at will (like they have been doing). The constitution says to amend a bill it must go back in front of the senate; I guess they don’t care about the constitution. Who is to say it won’t be put back in?

Are there death panels? Yes, Obamacare contains largely unreported text that allows the health secretary to limit any “alternative treatments” of the elderly, disabled or terminally ill. It is located on the bill at Sec. 6301\1182 SSA PPACA (Consolidated) page 678. Here you go, “The Secretary shall not use evidence or findings from comparative clinical effectiveness research conducted under section 1181 in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII in a manner that treats extending the life of an elderly, disabled, or terminally ill individual as of lower value than extending the life of an individual who is younger, nondisabled, or not terminally ill.” This is not a decision made by you and the doctor but the “Secretary” which from what I have read doesn’t even have to be in the medical field and is a political bureaucrat. So I guess you can say yes there is Death Panels

Is it a train wreck? Democratic Senator Max Baucus, the author of Obama Care says, “It is just a huge train wreck coming”. If the author of the bill says it is going to crash and burn, shouldn’t we repeal it and read it before passing it next time? The truth of the matter is; yes, it is a train wreck. We need to appeal it and try again with everyone having a say. We do need something done but this isn’t it, our Congress needs to do their job and read everything before passing it so we can stop it if it is a train wreck again instead of after the train has went off the cliff.

This is what was said on the Senate Floor, it shows employers cutting shifts hours to below thirty hours to prevent being fined. The IRS Chief Daniel Werfel says he’s rather not switch to Obamacare. According to the Congressional Budget Office, an estimated "7 million people will lose their employer-provided health insurance at the end of the year”, (I think it will be higher). This means they will "likely soon be paying $1400 a year (minimum) in mandated taxes (the level set by the Supreme Court), and those costs will rise dramatically over the next few years, according to the current schedule." The New York Times says, “Cities and towns across the country are pushing municipal unions to accept cheaper health benefits in anticipation of a component of the Affordable Care Act that will tax expensive plans”. To break it down, many of the middle and lower class will have to get two jobs. The ones who will keep their 40 hours will not get pay raises until the increased company cost is covered by the raise you would have received. Any senator, Democrat or Republican who voted for this bill without reading it needs to be removed. They receive $174,000 to do a job, not pass a bill without reading it.

Guns Save Lives and Not All Teens are Alter Boys



I believe our national media is to the point of being pretty well worthless. Gone are the days when you watched the news to get a story and see both sides. Gone is the reporter who tactfully, professionally, and purposeful as to not be bias, showed the struggle between two sides of an issue which enabled a debate with the facts. Today, most everything our national media presents is 100% bias with only one side being told, many times with false information and facts. With the bias media today, other then some local stations you never hear about the positive side of owning a gun and how it can save you, your family, or even a stranger. Below are some local news stories we should have seen on the national news.

A woman kills a rapist.


A 15 year old saves his 12 year old sister and himself from burglars.


Gun Carrying Man Ends Stabbing Spree at Salt Lake Grocery Store.


Woman shoots intruder during 911 call.


Armed 11 year old Girl Defends Home from 3 armed Burglars.


Woman Uses Handgun to Shoot Invade.


Man at ATM Shoots Armed Robber.


Clerk Shoots Robber.


One old man with a pistol bests three teenage robbers.


Teen Burglars Shot By Home Owner.


Gun Owner Kills Burglar.


Concealed carry kills robber at Dollar store. 


12-Year-Old Girl Shoots Intruder.


Guns can be used for good, but in the wrong hands they can be bad. Why does our government want only the bad to be armed? I can’t answer that. Why does it want to take law abiding citizens guns? It is to have more power over you and to relieve you of your freedoms. Another problem we need to come to grips with is we do not live in age of teens being innocent anymore. Just because they are a teen, does not mean they are a choir member and non-violent; many of them are very violent. Watch the stories below to see what I mean.

Two Teens try to rob a store with a sawed off shotgun.


An armed teen shot robbing a store.


Two teen shot while robbing a bakery.


Teen shoots and kills 80 year old.


One of two teen robbers shoot Teen student.


Two teens, 14 and 17 shoot 18 month old in the face.


After watching these I hope we can get people to come back to reality, just because they are a teen doesn’t mean they are innocent. We need to understand words better as well. Killing someone and murdering someone is not the same. If you are trying to do bodily damage to me and I extinguish your life, I killed you in self defense. If you are walking for no reason I extinguish your life, this is murder. Not talking about problems in our communities will never lead us to a fix. Throwing the race card up every time a white or black is involved in an altercation causes people to be desensitized; then when the KKK, New Black Panthers, or anybody else does do something that is racist everybody thinks its just another ruse. Our national media makes everything they can into a race issue; their reasoning, to get ratings. This is deplorable; they are all ninnyhammers.