Militarized Police Murdering Civilians




Special Weapons and Tactics is a commonly used proper name for law enforcement units, which use military-style light weapons and specialized tactics in high-risk operations that fall outside of the capabilities of regular, uniformed police. These are the only time any “Military Type” tactics should be used by a police force.  Their duties include: confronting heavily armed criminals; performing hostage rescue and counter-terrorism operations; high risk arrests; and entering armored or barricaded buildings. Today this has changed to where even if it is a search warrant, our police are using excess force and killing people. I am one who normally backs the police 100% of the time but this is getting out of hand and people are dying. These units are needed, just look at what happened in California in 1997, the North Hollywood shootout, 18 officers wounded before cops were given the firepower they needed by a gun store owner watching it on the news. The police were issued 9 mm and 38 Specials with half loads because the California politicians have no clue about what danger a police officer can be; the gun store (B & B Sales) owner saved their lives by giving them the needed fire power; after the police took down the bad guys, the DA tried to press charges on B & B Sales for not doing a back ground check before giving the police the weapons; charges were later dropped. After saving countless officers lives, the B & B Sales went out of business. This is why SWAT teams are needed but this isn’t what they are currently being used.

There has been a raise in tactical police raids causing a large raise in police instigated deaths, most of which are not the subject being sought. Instead of lowering the explosion point, many police forces are raising the ignition point and people are dying. The ACLU found 79% of the time a search warrant is issued, SWAT is used, remember:

"Special Weapons And Tactics"- is a commonly used proper name for law enforcement units, which use military-style light weapons and specialized tactics in high-risk operations that fall outside of the capabilities of regular, uniformed police.

Are you telling me that these tactics are needed in 79% of search warrants? I don’t think so; it is use of excess force usually resulting in major damage to the resident’s property and in many cases, death to an innocent. Weapons found at the scene, many of which were legal, was found only 35 % of the time. The harsh tactics and shoot first attitude has cost many people their life.


Tarika Wilson, SWAT broke down her door and shot her (she was unarmed) and wounded her 14 month old child she was holding, they also shot her two dogs; they were looking for her boyfriend. Prosecutors said Chavalia recklessly fired three shots into a bedroom where Wilson and her six children were gathered, even though he could not clearly see her or whether she had a weapon. Chavalia, an officer of 32-years, had testified that he thought his life was in danger when he fired the shots. He said he saw a shadow coming from behind a partially open bedroom door and heard gunshots that he thought were aimed at him. It turned out the gunfire he heard was coming from downstairs, nowhere close to him, where officers shot two charging pit bulls. Nowhere in all I have I read could I find that Ms. Wilson was holding anything other than her baby; so why was she shot and why was the cop not convicted? You, as a cop, never fire unless you see your target and know the bullets backstop, this is the first rule of engagement which was not followed. If I as a civilian would have done the same thing, I would be in jail.


Eurie Stamp was in his pajamas, watching a baseball game, when SWAT officers forced a battering ram through his front door and threw a flash bang grenade inside. Stamp, a 68-year-old grandfather of twelve, followed the officers’ shouted orders to lie face down on the floor with his arms above his head. He died in this position, when one of the officers’ guns discharged. Officer Duncan states, he stepped to his left, (Duncan) lost his balance and began to fall over backwards. Officer Duncan realized that his right foot was off the floor and the tactical equipment that he was wearing was making his movements very awkward. While falling, Officer Duncan removed his left hand from his rifle, which was pointing down towards the ground and put his left arm out to try and catch himself. As he did so, he heard a shot. Tactical weapons just don’t go off, you have to pull the trigger or fall with your finger on the trigger. This again goes against what you are trained to do, you never have your finger on the trigger unless you confront a hostile target. His girlfriend’s son was the suspect and didn’t live at the residence and was already in custody when the shooting took place. The shooting was ruled an accident but why did they do this type of raid? There was no reason. He was lying on the floor and was shot in the back; manslaughter charges should have been filed or was this another case of the “Blue Shield”?


Bounkham (Bou Bou)Phonesavanh, a 19 month old in Georgia, had the police with a no knock warrant throw a flash bang grenade into his crib; it went off and he was crying. The mother asks for her child not knowing the grenade went off next to his head, she just knew he was screaming. The authorities reassured her that everything was fine, “‘He’s okay, he’s just fine, there’s nothing wrong with him, but there was and the authorities lied about it. The Special Response Team (SRT) or another name for their SWAT team is taught to insert the “flash and bang” three to five inches inside the door so why was it tossed into a crib? The police was watching the house for a while and says a confidential informant (a druggy) made a purchase of drugs in the doorway, they also said they didn’t see any signs of children or they would have done things differently; what about the car seats in the vehicles. Authorities did not make any arrests, nor did they find anything at the house during the raid so where they watching the house or taking a druggy’s word? Anyway you look at it, a 19 month old is in a coma because of these aggressive tactics which should have been handled with a standard search warrant. It could have been worse I guess.


Aiyana Jones in Detroit Michigan was seven years old and shot by Joe Weekley. Weekley is a member of Detroit's SWAT team and was a frequent subject on A&E. Geoffrey Fieger filed lawsuits on behalf of Aiyana's family claiming the A&E footage shows that the lethal bullet came from outside, not inside as police stated. A Detroit spokesman demanded the tape from Fieger to help the Michigan State Police investigators. Fieger said he would when he received it from A&E and hoped to release it to the media. After filing suit against the city, Fieger requested the video from A&E Network; they refused. If this is an official police investigation, can’t they get a warrant to get the tape? Or is the true reason because he was one of their money makers and the Detroit cops, who have a history of corruption, don’t want the tape to be seen? I can think of no other reason.

Many people say SWAT type unit are unnecessary and need to be disbanded, I disagree, they are needed but they need to go back to what they were intended for; when situations happen that the normal officer can’t or isn’t equipped to handle; confronting heavily armed criminals; performing hostage rescue and counter-terrorism operations; high risk arrests; and entering armored or barricaded buildings; not serving self initiated search warrants. 

The other side of this coin most don’t look at is asset forfeiture, not only the IRS but the police will seize your property and cash as spoils of the conquest before you have even went to trial; isn’t innocent until proven guilty in the Constitution? I have watched police and county officials try and frame a guy because they wanted the profit that would be made off the sale of his land, the only problem, he was strait as an arrow. They took two druggies and coerced them to implicate this man (came out in the investigation) so they would get off on their drug charges with a warning. So you have an upstanding citizen and two druggies and the police and county officials take the word of the druggies with no evidence to back up their warrant. The judge who signed the warrant, the cop who initiated the process and the city officials who created and ran this scheme need to all be disbarred and put in jail for Constitutional right violations. The man’s lawyers ate the city alive; he had enough money for a good lawyer but what about the small guy who doesn’t? As the New Yorker’s Stillman wrote in another piece, informants are “the foot soldiers in the government’s war on drugs. By some estimates, up to eighty per cent of all drug cases in America involve them.” So instead of doing good police work, you try the fast track of using druggies and other type of informants who have no integrity, character, or honesty; sounds like our politicians. 

Another part of this is lack of oversight and laws made to where when the police are negligent; you can’t sue them or the city. The ACLU says its racist because of all the incidents studied the people impacted were 39 % Black, 11 % Latino, 20 % white with 30% not identified in big cities like DC, but if you look at the demographics of DC, it is 50.7% Black, 9.1% Latino, and 38.5% white, so in my boat that doesn’t hold water, I do not think the cops are racist as the ACLU claims although the ACLU may be. In short, the police need to stop the massive growth of these type of raids to only when necessary, in the last twenty years they have rose by over 400% yet the crime rate has been dropping, but the casualty rate has went up astronomically with them being innocent people. Most of the police out there are good cops, they just want to do the job right and help people. Unfortunately, we have seen a influx of cops who are on power trips and believe they are untouchable and the law doesn’t apply to them. I made a statement earlier about the “Blue Shield”, this is when cops cover for cops who accidentally or purposefully commit a crime; this takes away from the integrity most police have and if you are a cop doing this, you need to show more integrity and be the officer kids want to look up to.

Obama and Other Ultra Liberals Destroying Our Military




It is easy to document the daily attacks on our military by liberals, it is like all they want to do is destroy the most respectful military in the world anyway they can and their champion at the current time is none other than the Commander and Chief Barrack Husain Obama. First the Trinity of Tyranny (TOT), Obama, Pelosi, and Reid, tried to make our soldiers pay for their own battlefield injuries, this came with a huge backlash from the public but the backlash was mainly one sided. Our military has always been protected by both the Democrats and Republicans but not anymore, with the super liberals in full control of the Democratic party, and with the leadership of the TOT, under the Obama administration, more damage has been done to our military than any other president in history; it’s not your grand fathers Democratic party anymore.

As an ultra liberal President Obama and his minions Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid didn’t waste any time to start another attack on the military by cutting production of the world’s premiere fighter, the F-22. As usual with CNN spin it to say the president rejects additional spending but the Air Force had already paid for them. Here is the rub, the F-15 is our premiere front line fighter, it came into the Air Force Inventory in 1972. It is old and the airframes are starting to literally come apart due to years of service and stress, we need a new fighter to replace our aging Air Superiority Fighters. The F-22 was to replace the F-15, and the F-35 was to replace the F-16, F-18, the AV-8 Harrier, and several others to keep us ahead of all other nations and remain number one in the world in the air. If you really wanted to save money, combining several aircraft requirements down to two would save tons just from the smaller logistical footprint. All in all you can say that the Obama’s TOT, has made the battle ground less safe for our troops and the air less safe for our pilots, what could be next.

You should never ask “what could be next” because it will bite you in the butt. The military has a long history of religious tolerance, we don’t care what faith you belong to or ever care if you don’t believe in religion at all; now it is under attack by this administration. The president and Pentagon selected an anti-Christian zealot, Mike Weinstein, to be the next military adviser for writing religious tolerance policies. Mike Weinstein is the founder of Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), and stated, “Today, we face incredibly well-funded gangs of fundamentalist Christian monsters who terrorize their fellow Americans by forcing their weaponized and twisted version of Christianity upon their helpless subordinates in our nation’s armed forces”; he is a self confessing religion hater, does this sound like a person who is for religious tolerance or someone who is for religious persecution? Shortly after Mike Weinstein took over, a story broke stating, “Pentagon May Court Martial Solders Who Share Christian Faith.” So now TOT has made the military less safe in the air and on ground and is in the process of removing our faith from the military; what else could they do to hurt us?

The next item was to remove benefits by claiming a Jihadist attack from a Muslim traitor was an act of "Work Place Violence". Army Major Nidal Hasan was an Army psychiatrist and was a “moderate Muslim” born in Arlington Virginia. Before the shooting at Fort Hood, Major Hasan had many complaints filed against him for making anti-American statements but was not challenged because of the liberal's political correctness standard. An FBI investigation showed Major Hasan was in contact with Anwar al-Awlaki, a jihadist Imam and member of Al Qaeda but the FBI said Major Hasan wasn’t a threat. CIA officer, Bruce Riedel said, “E-mailing a known al-Qaeda sympathizer should have set off alarm bells. Even if he was exchanging recipes, the bureau should have put out an alert” and he was right, he was signing his emails with SOA (Soldier of Allah) and SWT (subhanahu wa ta'ala or Glory to God) which is used by Jihadist and Al Qaeda, this was a text book pre-sequel to a home grown Al Qaeda terrorist attack. On 5 November 2009, Major Hasan murdered 13 people and wounded 30 more while yelling "Allahu Akbar" which means Allah is Great. After the attack the first words from this administration was, “this is not a terrorist attack” when all actions leading up to the attack shows it was a terrorist attack. Several victims filed suit against the Government because the benefits they should be receiving were taken away by the Obama administration classifying this as “Work Place Violence” instead of the terrorist attack. This was done for political reasons; the Commander and Chief has now stabbed every military person in the back for political reasons yet again. Let’s see what is next.

In 2012, Senator Jim Webb, a Democrat from Virginia, and a liberal minion of President Obama, who is chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee's, approved a change that would take away "Imminent Danger Pay" from our troops. The Senate Armed Services Committee as part of the 2012 defense authorization bill, S 1254, changed provision giving $225 a month for hostile fire and imminent danger pay to $7.50 a day. Senator Webb called the change a "basic accounting measure to ensure that individuals receive hostile fire or imminent danger pay only for the time they spend in qualifying areas." Senator Webb said "combat troops will see a minimal impact as they are stationed full time in a qualified area." The rub is what the definition of a qualified area is. When I was in Iraq, we had the "Green Zone", is it a qualified as a qualified area? What the liberal democrats will do is manipulate it to the point of where only if you step outside the gate, out of the green zone will it be a qualified area; I was almost killed in the Green Zone by an IED (Improvised Explosive Device) so is there a safe area. Currently they say it is for the people who make a quick trip into the hostile zone but I bet that will change; they can give criminals (illegal aliens) and terrorist (Guantanamo Bay prisoners) all the special treatment around no matter the cost, even setting known murders free but they will always take anything they can from the military. What could be after that?

When it came to the minimum wage battle, President Obama passed a bill to make all Federal employees minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10, a 29% raise. President Obama has now mandate that all companies who do business with the federal Government pay a $10.10 per hour minimum wage. Once again through ignorance and arrogance, President Obama has just destroyed the job market for military dependents and removed many businesses from the base which was put there to help the service member. No company will be forced to raise their workers pay by 29% inside a military base and just as predicted, Burger King, Popeye's Chicken, Pizza, Barber Shops, Beauty Shops, and many other private venders which operate inside the gates of our military facilities will close their doors. What President Obama once again does not understand due to his ignorance is these companies donate a portion of their profits toward athletic programs, dependent programs, exercise programs, and social support clubs just to name a few for the troops every year; if he does know it, it just shows another example that he hates the military.

Now we know parts of the war, but there are many more, the Obama Administration and the Trinity of Tyranny has inflicted on our military. These ultra liberals have made our soldiers less safe, took their faith unless you are Muslim, stabbed the military in the back taking their benefits from a terrorist attacks, taking the small compensation for when the military is in harm’s way, taken away dependence job opportunities, and now they have taken any convenience to Burger King, Popeye's Chicken, Pizza, Barber Shops, Beauty Shops, and many other private venders off the bases yet turn around and give all it can to criminals (illegal aliens) and terrorist (Guantanamo Bay prisoners). Every liberal politician hates the military and this is very evident with this administration, I only named a few but there are many more. If you are a true American Patriot you need to remove these liberals from both parties out of office because I don’t want Calvin Coolidge’s quote to become the vision of America’s future.

“The nation which forgets its defenders will be itself forgotten.” Calvin Coolidge

Cutting Down on Irresponsibility







In Virginia, a man who has fathered more than seven children he has by at least six women was given a plea deal that if he received a vasectomy, his sentence would be reduced by five years. Jessie Lee Herald, 27, wasn’t charged with any type of sexual crime but was offered this deal by the Shenandoah County assistant prosecutor Ilona White stating, “He needs to be able to support the children he already has when he gets out” which I agree. We have a lot of dead beat dads fathering kids with multiple women and dead beat moms birthing kids from multiple men and neither is being responsible. These people are irresponsible, they are nothing but leaches on our society and is one reason the US is stumbling. I am not talking about the ones who accidently get pregnant once and learns to be responsible from that situation, I am talking about the ones (men and women) who have multiple partners with multiple kids and can’t on their own take care of any of them without subsistence. Their attitude, “The Government will pay for it” needs to end.

I am mostly a libertarian and don’t like the government in anyone’s business especially mine, but this theology is a two edge sword; you need to be responsible on your own accord or be enslaved by the government and let the government make the decisions for you because you are not responsible. The Government making the decision can be you are not allowed to have kids and forced sterilization. Currently too many have their cake and eat it as well, if you think as I do, you can give birth or father to as many kid as you want but you likewise should receive no subsistence from the government to take care of them because it is your responsibility.

Many tax payers want it so when you are on subsistence, the doctor will perform reversible procedures to inhibit you from fathering or having kids which will be reversed at the governments expense if asked once you become self supportive and a contributing member of society instead of a leach. I know if this ever happened, it will upset people but you need to be responsible or the government will do what it wants; being responsible for yourself with no others (the government) involved is true freedom, having the government in every aspect of your life, telling you what you must do, changing any agreement when they want (but not you) is social slavery and where the liberals from both the Democrats and Republicans has pushed the minorities and poor in our country. Their thoughts are, “Here, we will give you money; you just have to vote for us, because we will give you money” but they never want you to get out of the hole you are in because you will then have control, and they want the control. I grew up poor; I had duct tape wrapped around my “Chuck Taylor” tennis shoes because of the holes in the bottom and we couldn't afford another pair. Every time I went to school, the Student Guidance Counselor told me I might as well quit because I was from the wrong side of the tracks; I made it out and so can anyone else but I nor anyone else can do it for you.

There are many things I have heard people say and many of them make since but are also very offensive. If you are going to let the government run your life, there are areas that should be implemented. These are just things floating around the web so they are not my idea, but it’s the way it may be if we keep letting the government dictates our lives. Remember I’m just repeating what I have read in the media and blogs.


  • While on welfare, food stamps, or any other subsidies you must be on birth control (females) or have a reversible vasectomy.

  • While on welfare, food stamps, or any other subsidies you must be drug tested.


  • While on welfare, food stamps, or any other subsidies you cannot vote.

I have read these on several different web sites and the ones paying taxes will say "More power to you" while the other side will say, "Are you out of your mind." It isn't a "White man's greed leaves a world in need-President Obama", it's a "Lazy/liberal man's greed leaves a world in need-American Patriot." Think about how much we could help the US and the rest of the world if entitlements didn't rape our federal income. If you take the NET profit the federal government makes and check the non-Discretionary and Discretionary spending for entitlements, you will find entitlements take 60% of the money while our defense only takes 15% of the money; something needs to be done. When our politicians want all the pork they can get and around 40% plus of our citizens are on some sort of entitlement, something is wrong; both are irresponsible. The income tax and Social Security Tax are the biggest ponzi schemes in history and what do the politicians and freeloaders do, they keep asking for more.

Please comment.

The IRS, Corrupt Like No Other


  



The IRS (Irresponsible-Reprobate-Scourge) under President Obama’s direct guidance has had a colorful time and is perceived to have has violated the law more times than any other agency in US history. We know the IRS targeted conservative group and any group in which President Obama didn’t agree. We know the IRS targeting was directed by the White House and carried out by Lois Lerner which is again illegal. This is the liberal way but it is still illegal and should be prosecuted by the DOJ but with the DOJ not following the law or the Constitution, what do you expect will happen, the head of the DOJ is liberal as well. Here is the rub, now that they have tried to delete all these email, they have committed a class 1 felony with many accomplices, you would have to wipe the computer, email server, and the archives both written and digital. You need to ask yourself an important question, do you think politicians and their minions are better then you? My daddy told me that no one was better than me; his only caveat was that I was not better than anyone else. He said, “You may be smarter, you may be faster, you may be better looking, and you may be richer then me but you are not better than me nor I am you. I work for the government and all of us have to follow the rules when it came to computers or we would be fired. Why are the politicians and their minions allowed to violate these rules?

1.   You can only do official business on government computers. Using a personal computer for official business is a fireable offence.
2.   Emails are government property; it’s a fireable offence and criminal to destroy emails.
3.   Watching Porn on a government computer is a fireable offence.

All emails go through a mail server so even if you deleted them from your computer they will still be stored with a redundant backup, if these emails are truly gone it was purposeful, directed, and criminal; it is a verified cover-up.

7.   IRS employees may not send SBU data by electronic mail outside the IRS unless an IT approved exception is obtained. See the Electronic Mail and Secure Messaging section of IRM 11.3.1 for details.

1.10.3.2.3
Emails are Federal Records
1.   All federal employees and federal contractors are required by law to preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency. Records must be properly stored and preserved, available for retrieval and subject to appropriate approved disposition schedules.

3.   All activities associated with initiating and continuing matching programs subject to the computer matching provisions of the CMA within the IRS shall be coordinated through the GLD Office of Data Services.

We know Lois Lerner is guilt, we know President Obama ordered it, and we know Eric Holder is covering it up; all three are violating the US Constitution but they are liberals, they don’t care what law they break as long as they their agenda through. We know Lois Lerner was ordered to print out these emails and “Poof” they were gone which again is a felony for destruction of government property and destruction of property in an official investigation. If you remember that President Obama said we would not find, “not even a smidgen of corruption,” we now know it was because he had ordered the destruction of all evidence. Here is a question, why doesn't someone offer a million dollars for anyone who can come up with the Learner emails, no questions asked, I think we would find them very quickly and the reading would be very interesting.

I don’t care if you are a Democrat or a Republican; Obama needs to be impeached and so does Eric Holder for multitudes of Constitutional violations and failure to properly discharge the duties of their offices. If this was G. W. Bush doing the same thing, I would say the same thing, it shouldn’t matter the party; but it always does, especially with liberals. If you look at President Clintons Impeachment trial, he had four total charges files and was found guilty on two and not guilty on two. When you looked at the evidence, there was no doubt he committed perjury but his party voted not guilty; this is the problem with our politics today and it is greatly magnified with President Obama. Today, the truth doesn’t matter to politicians, only getting an agenda through. Today what’s best for the country doesn’t matter to politicians, only what is best for them. Few of our politicians have any patriotism anymore; just greed for a title, money, and power. Do you have to ask why our country is falling apart?

Obama Hates the Military, Now He Will Sacrifice 250 to 275 Troops!





How this state of affairs in Iraq did came about? As I wrote in the past that pulling out of Iraq was a decision that would come back to haunt us, it is now doing just that. I said we will have to go back over to Iraq because they were not ready to take over their own security and the region was still unstable. Germany after WWII remained unstable until around 1970 with the biggest uprising in June 1953, it took around 25 years before they became stable and now Germany is the strongest country in Europe; all it took was time and commitment from the US. Because President Obama pulled out without listening to his military leaders, we will now be back in Iraq probably sooner than later. President Obama was told this was a mistake by his military leaders but as all liberals do, he let politics get in the way of doing what is right. This decision to pull out was pure politics; he loathes the military and he couldn’t reduce the military if they are in a war zone. He has stated he wants a Civilian National Security Force” equal to the Military which is highlighted in “Obama’s and the Democrat’s War on the Military.” Our military is at the same level it was before WWII and now President Obama has let our nation’s number one enemy, terrorist, takes charge of an area we swore to protect.

Now President Obama has sent troops back; did he send enough to do the job? No, he sent between 250 and 275 Army and Marines to help defend the US Embassy against 200,000 insurgents; I know he hates the military and the Army and Marines are an awesome fighting forces but 800 to 1 odds are a little steep even for our Special Forces. President Obama says that the Marines only purpose will be to protect U.S. personnel and the embassy in Baghdad and not to join in the fierce fighting raging outside the Iraqi capital, Obama has vowed to keep US forces out of combat in Iraq. Ok, let me see; insurgents have already been firing on the US Embassy, even with rockets, our embassy was the first place they went and I guess our Marines can tell them, “Sorry, we can’t engage you by presidential order or we will get court martialled.” How do you think that will work out?



Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) have mass executed tens of thousands police, military, and many civilians with whom they come into contact; 1,700 in one spot. The president did tell Congress, however, that American military personnel in Baghdad will be “equipped for combat”, what idiot would think they would go in any other way? Leaving Iraq in 2010 we were not allowed to return fire when fired upon due to a Barak Obama presidential order and we did loose people, but the Obama news never really reported it, did they. In 2010, Tareq Aziz accused President Obama of "leaving Iraq to the wolves" by pressing ahead with a withdrawal of combat troops despite a recent upsurge in violence and he was right. We were told by CNN and MSNBC that the Iraqis ordered us out but this was untrue. By the US leaving, the Iraqis, who once hailed Americans as their saviors, now say, “We are all victims of America and Britain," due to President Obama not honoring his promise to protect the Iraqi borders. This time, he did have to wait until his four days of golf trip was over before he could make this decision on an item of National Security and I bet he ignored the military leaders as always. They have the knowledge to do this right, but the President always wants credit when it goes right but blames others when it goes wrong, and he always ignores the military especially their leaders. Secretary of State (at this time) Hilary Clinton warned Iran and others not view the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq as an opportunity to try to build its influence in the country. "No one, most particularly Iran, should miscalculate about our continuing commitment to and with the Iraqis going forward", yes her and the president lied again; just ask all the dead in Iraq. Now he sends 275 troops to this hell hole; I wonder if we will have another Benghazi except this time it won’t be only four dead but many more; the response from the administration will probably be, “What difference does it make?” 

President Obama, here is a thought that any good leader would contemplate and initiate; we have been trying to destroy Al Qaida for 13 years but they are always hiding within the people and now we have 200,000 of them driving vehicles toward Bagdad; how much easier could it get? How many could we kill now that they are all in mass and this would be with little or no American casualties; this would be the perfect opportunity to rid the world of a massive group of terrorist; you promised to help Iraq with their security if they had problems and now we can kill two birds with one stone; help Iraq and kill a massive amount of terrorist. Mr. President, the sad part is I know you will never do this because it takes a true leader which you are not would have already done so. Every piece of foreign policy you touch is disastrous as it is with your domestic policies; but your disastrous foreign policy and broken promises are costing tens of thousands people their lives. Again with this you will basically turn a blind eye and it was someone else’s fault, it is never yours; beheaded men, women, and children line the road to Bagdad and their blood covers your hands.

Congress Reports to the USDHHS?









Apparently our Congress has been neutered because they haven’t got the balls to stand up to corruption. After Congress asked, the USDHHS (United States Department of Health and Human Services) invited members of Congress and their senior staff to view a holding facility for the new influx of illegal children, but there is a catch, they can only do what the USDHHS wants; they cannot have cameras and cannot ask questions of staff or illegal aliens. The 40-minute tour will take place Friday at the Ventura County Naval Base in Oxnard, California according the Daily Caller.

The tour are to give members of Congress a look at how temporary facilities are used to house illegal alien kids in the US without their parents. The kids, who are from El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala, are being called Unaccompanied Children (UACs). Rose Hacking sent members of Congress the invitation with the following commands:

  • No recording devices will be allowed (We may ask you to leave your cell phone in our vehicle).
  • No questions will be allowed during the tour, but questions will be addressed later. 
  • No interacting with staff and children at the shelter. 
  • We will provide photos of the facility after the tour. 
  • During the tour,”the tour guide will detail what goes on from room to room and the services youth are provided on a daily basis,” the email invitation reads.

Just go get a Congressional order to visit anytime you like ask as many questions of any you see. You are telling me a Staff Agency can tell Congress what to do; I DON’T THINK SO! This tactic is like telling your boss they can’t ask about your work, why would they; because they are covering something up. The UACs are part of an unprecedented surge overwhelmed immigration agencies and why we need a secured boarder. We should be turning them away from the boarder but instead, U.S. immigration policy requires UACs be placed in shelters to await federal agencies to begin deportation; they will look for relatives or sponsors to house them in the US until they are deported which means in laymen’s terms; they will never leave. Many will fall into the hands of human traffickers who were acting as their relatives or sponsors. You need to ask yourself a question, when did USDHHS become more powerful then the US Congress? Where does a staff agency get the authority to push the US Congress around? Why doesn’t our US Congress grow a set and tell the USDHHS; we will go where we want, ask what questions we want, and take any and as many pictures we want, and you will comply.

Under President Obama in the last year, apprehensions have went up 92%, President Obama claims, “America is expelling illegal immigrants at nine times the rate of 20 years ago; nearly 2 million so far according to President Obama, easily outpacing any previous president.”  If you look closer according to Julia Preston of the New York Times, in the fiscal year 2013, the immigration courts saw a 43 percent drop in the number of people who have been deported in the last five years; so how can you deport more with less deportation hearing? Once again our president shows us he thinks we are stupid and lies to our faces. Of all the politicians I have seen, President Obama and his administrations lies more than any other in the past including Richard Nixon’s which is saying something. It has the most nontransparent administration bar none and now are bringing these Illegal alien children into the country illegally which by his action will have harmful effects; many will be turned into sex slaves and I ask you, is this really what our Founding Father really wanted? Would our Founding Fathers want people breaking into our country? Would our Founding Fathers want a government who spends more than they ever should? Would our Founding Fathers want a president and his administration lying at every turn? Would our Founding Fathers want a president apologizing for perceived wrongs in his opinion only? Would our Founding Fathers want the president and DOJ to pick and choose which laws they want to enforce or obey the US Constitution? Would our Founding Fathers want the president to use the IRS, NSA, EPA, BLM, ATF, FDA, and the DOJ to intimidate, attack, and spread tyranny across the land? Of course the answer is NO; but this is how harmful this administration has become. Our Founding Fathers would want us to obey and enforce the law, live free and prosper, not take from the working class to give to the lazy; our government needs to secure the borders and get back to following the Constitution.