Islamist Infiltration of the Obama Administration

I'm not sure if this is on purpose, just due to plain ignorance, or plain arrogance in the current administration but along with all the "False Scandals" which turned out not to be, there is talk of the Obama administration allowing Islamist to infiltrate the US government. If you have watched the news, Islamism in government such as the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group in Egypt, do nothing but destroy countries, then kill, and take any freedom present away from the people. One thing that does bother me is the fact that when the Muslim Brotherhood took charge in Egypt, President Obama backed this terrorist group 100%; he was ready to give the Muslim Brotherhood and President Morsi $1.5 Billion in US military aid knowing they are a terrorist group but lets give President Obama the benefit of a doubt since Egypt is an ally.

The first part of doubt leaving was when the Egyptian people revolted against our and Israel's ally, President Mubarak and is hailed by President Obama as "the Egyptian people have spoken." At this point a western friendly government was removed and an Islamic president from the terror group Muslim Brotherhood, Mr. Morsi was elected as president. His first order of business was to terminating Egypt's Constitution and Egypt's Legal system removing all and becoming a dictator. The true colors of President Obama comes through with what happened next. When the people revolted against the new Egyptian dictator President Morsi, for terminating Egypt's Constitution, terminating Egypt's Legal system, and literally terminating over a thousand people lives who spoke against him, you would of expected the same speech from President Obama, "the Egyptian people have spoken" but instead he condemned the people for overthrowing President Morsi, the same thing they did to President Mubarak; but what is the difference? The biggest stanch difference is President Mubarak was ours and Israel's ally and President Morsi was the leader of a terrorist group. President Obama then stopped support to Egypt and demanded a review of aid to Egypt; sounds like someone having a temper tantrum. The Egyptian people, once our trusted ally is angry with President Obama's backing of the Muslim Brotherhood. But this administrations foreign policy with Mrs. Clinton or Mr. Kerry is the worst ever seen in US history; in short it sucks. So lets see what is happening state side. Just incase you didn't know, President Obama's half brother, Malik Obama is a leader in the Muslim Brotherhood.

In June 2012, many lawmakers sent letters to the inspectors general at the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice Department, Defense Department, and State Department asking them to investigate “policies and activities" which seem to be supporting the Muslim Brotherhood, al Qaeda, and Hamas, all known terrorist group. A State Department official Huma Abedin, the daughter of Saleha Mahmood Abedin, a pro-Sharia sociologist with ties to numerous Islamist organizations including the Muslim Brotherhood was said to be an operative of the Muslim Brotherhood. If this isn't enough, watch how the State Department promotes cleric who called for US troop deaths; listen to the whole video. Apparently they have found 6 Muslim Brotherhood personnel working in the white house, I have been looking more info but many of the stories I bookmarked on several sites have been taken down including The State Department and Homeland Security story links; I wonder why.

In our school, the federal government started a movement to replace traditional curriculum with government information documents. The required books are pushing "Anti-Christian, Revisionist History Curriculum" and asserting the Muslim religion over all others; it is backed by CAIR and Muslim Brotherhood. In a report by the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum collaborative (TESCCC), their report shows that these changes portrayed participants in the Boston Tea Party as terrorists. All though by law the curriculum is supposed to be accessible to parents, parents have been denied access to the curriculum and that teachers were even given a “gag order”, signing a copy of the gag order without legal counsel, but they are finding ways of obtaining the curriculum to get the word out. The only reason to gag order teachers and refuse to let parents read the curriculum is to indoctrinate the children. Our country has always been a big melting pot for all, but what do you do when they don't want to melt but take you over? To see what is the truth, the "Muslim Minority Affair" can give you some insight; they don't want to integrate with the US society, they want to dominate. Just to let you know who in the President Obama administration has been linked to these groups, I'll end with the list below.

Abedin, Huma: Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Abunimah, Ali: Vice president of the Arab American Action Network

Al-Hibri, Azizah: U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom

Al-Mansour, Khalid Abdullah Tariq: Patron of Obama during 1980s

Al-Marayati, Salam: Representative of the U.S. government at the annual Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe conference

Alikhan, Areef: Department of Homeland Security

Asbahi, Mazen: National Coordinator for Muslim American Affairs (during 2008 presidential campaign)

Elibiary, Mohamed: Homeland Security Advisory Council

Husaini, Minha: National Coordinator for Muslim American Affairs (during 2008 presidential campaign)

Hussain, Rashad: Special Envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference

Khalidi, Rashid: Professor of Middle East Studies at Columbia University

Magid, Mohamed: Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Countering Violent Extremism Working Group

Mattson, Ingrid: Invited by Obama advisor to work on the White House Council on Women and Girls

Mogahed, Dalia: Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships

Obama, Abon'go Malik: the older half-brother of Barack Obama

Patel, Eboo: Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships

Said, Edward: Professor and Arab activist who was keynote speaker at 1998 fundraiser attended by Obama

Shora, Kareem: Homeland Security Advisory Council

Shora, Nawar: Senior Advisor to the Civil Rights and Liberties Office of the Transportation Security Administration

And here is a couple of groups to look up.

Arab American Action Network: Received money from Woods Fund when Obama was board member of Woods Fund

Barack H. Obama Foundation: Headed by President Obama's half-brother, who oversees the Muslim Brotherhood's international investments.

 

So ask yourself, do we have a "Islamist Infiltration of the Obama Administration or is this just by mistake?"

Illegal Aliens and Their Effect on America

Before I get started, this is about all illegal aliens and no one specific group. I will refer allot to Mexico because Mexicans are the majority of our illegal aliens and the majority of all illegal aliens pass through the Mexican boarder. But make no mistake, an illegal alien is anyone from any country crossing the US boarder without permission, a visa, or overstaying their permission or visa and remaining in the US. Since the Mexican boarder is the most violated boarder, we will first take a look to see what Mexican law says about people who illegally cross their boarder.

From the Washington Times “Under the Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony punishable by up to two years in prison. Immigrants who are deported and attempt to reenter can be imprisoned for 10 years. Visa violators can be sentenced to six year terms. Mexicans who help illegal immigrants are considered criminals.” In an interview with Wolf Blitzer, Mexican President says this isn't true but then admits it really is true. As a matter of fact, the Mexican government built a 541 mile fence along the Mexican/

Gaugamela boarder yet this didn't stop Mexico's President from criticizing Arizona immigration law, Senate Bill 1070; can you say hypocrite? One may ask, what does it matter if we have new people coming to the US to make a better life. Lets go through some facts you may not be aware of.

Some people say mass immigration into the US will lower world poverty, but they are wrong; all mass illegal immigration will do is collapse our economical system as Roy Becks presentation, "World Poverty" has shown us. If we don't return the illegal aliens to their countries and reduce our immigration level to a sustainable level, this presentation "Immigration by the Numbers" video is what will happen to our country. You need to ask yourself, is this what you want for your kids and grandkids? We have already started looking like a third world country, according to federal government estimates, illegals each year leave more than 500 tons of trash and more than 100 abandoned vehicles at just one national wildlife refuge along the Arizona border and left over 1000 tons of trash in Arizona alone. What is our government, especially the EPA doing about it, nothing.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on Aug. 8, 2012 it signed an agreement with Mexico addressing “high priority border environmental issues.” Those issues in the agreement include reducing air pollution, improving access to clean air and water, and to “enhance compliance assurance and environmental stewardship” on both sides of the border but the 43-page document, “Border 2020: U.S-Mexico Environmental Program,” doesn't say a word about human and drug trafficking and other illegal activities of Mexican drug cartels and other people who are illegally entering the country and their environmental impact. Shouldn't one of our prime objectives be to stop human trafficking? The agreement states that “protecting the health and the environment in the border region is essential to ensuring that the U.S. continues to be safe, healthy and economically productive,” but does not address the environmental and safety threat posed in the border region by illegal immigration and other crimes. Now we have the crime with the cartels passing over into the US.

You need to understand that most of the Mexican government is corrupt, most of the Mexican Army work for the drug cartels. Reports obtained under the federal Freedom of Information Act show that members of Mexico’s Army have crossed into the U.S. at least 300 times over the past 18 years and this is just when they were caught. In January 2014, soldiers from this lonely outpost of the Mexican Army drew their guns on U.S. Border Patrol agents just 50 yards into the United States. The Mexican soldiers carried G-3 rifles and claimed they’d gotten lost while pursuing a drug smuggler. First we gave them GPSs so how did they get lost? Second, they weren't pursuing drug smugglers; they were clearing a path for them. In March, the Mexican Army on the US side of the boarder, opened fire on Javier Jose Rodriguez, a young Tucson man visiting family in Sásabe. When he was driving around the town early on a Saturday morning after drinking beer with friends they shot him in the arm and in the side, Rodriguez spent three weeks at the University of Arizona Medical Center. His medical bills are now over $43,000 and he wants justice. He stumbled into the Mexican Army protecting drug smugglers and they shoot first and never ask questions later; he is lucky he survived. You thought you were safe inside your country's boarders from another countries army; guess again.

The cartels are brazen, down on the boarder they leave signs for our law enforcement personnel saying, "Plata O Plomo" translated "Silver or Lead"; you either help us or we kill you in laymen's terms.  The cartels threaten to snipe the Boarder Patrol and Texas Rangers from the Mexican side of the boarder. Two armed Mexican soldiers crossed into the Arizona and drew their guns during a concerning stand off with Border Patrol agents back in January, the Mexican government and U.S. officials have confirmed and this has happened more then 20 times that we know of since 2010. A new report from the State of Texas shows the problems and dangers regular US citizens are in, created by drugs on our side of the border from Mexican organized crime inside the US.

The drug cartels are now in the US being highlighted in Chicago and will do anything they want even within the US. The National Drug Intelligence Center currently the drug cartels operate in at lease 195 US cities because our boarders are not secure. Having a boarder fence and permanent people on the boarder is the best and only way to stop them but our government officials make too much money off them. I was part of a group running Drug Interdiction (DI) out of Porto Rico back in the 1980s. We would have known planes hauling drugs headed toward the US and move to intercept them and would receive a congressional order to "Cease and Desist" which tells me we need to weed out the crooked politicians along with the drug cartels out of the US. But instead of helping, what is our government doing? President Obama has selected an area to become a national monument which would make it virtually impossible to secure the boarder; I wonder if his reasoning is political or monetary. What is sad is that even Senate Democrats recognize they need the boarder secured.

The truth is, foreign people make up 8.6% of our population with illegal aliens make up 6.3% of our population yet commit 26.4% of the crimes according to The Federal Bureau of Prisons. Even though all illegals are criminals, the percentage of hardened criminals of the 6.3% of the illegal aliens is estimated to be between 75-85% who are committing crimes while in the US not counting illegal entry. No one knows for sure due to several state and city governments refusal to track these stats in many sanctuary cities. These crimes include everything from murder and drugs to identity theft and DUIs. We have elected officials telling us want to usurp the American government for the illegal aliens at Atlan and LaRaza rallies within the US as shown in this video, isn't plotting against the United States treason? Where are our law enforcement? The only thing we can be for sure of is that the long term effects of illegal aliens on our country is the destruction of the economically, judicially, and literally of our country. In their words not mine, "It's time to kill every white person." Isn't this hate speech? You got to ask which will destroy America first, the illegal aliens and Islamic terrorist?  By the way, doesn't our president have illegal alien relatives in the country?

Obama’s and the Democrat’s War on the Military

It is no secret that the majorities of Democrat politicians, no matter what they say in public, hate the military and will do anything they can to gut it to give to those, most of whom have never sacrificed anything for their government. The last true Democrat I can remember truly supporting the military, speaking loudly against others in his party, like John Kerry, to support the military and keeping our country safe was Sam Nunn. This is NOT an endorsement of his daughter, Michelle Nunn who is running for office in Georgia, from what I have read she is the opposite of her father. Now I cannot find a Democrat to truly stand with our troops without it being a political stunt or a photo op for a campaign of some sort and their attack on the military over the past 40 years has been fierce. As the gutting of our military continues and the handing all entitlements to those who have no tendency of being a contributing member of society expands, our country is headed from being the Supreme World Superpower to a Third World Country; as Detroit was destroyed by the progressive liberal policies, so will be the fate of our country if things don’t change. Once President Obama took office the first thing he said was, “It’s all Bush’s fault” which may or may not be true but nothing has been done under his watch to fix it; in contrary everything done under his watch has made it worse.

The first line of business for the new Secretary of State Hilary Clinton to protect our nation and its people was to resend an order blocking terrorist from obtaining visas to come to the US; you see in the liberal mind, 911 was all our fault. Then we had Benghazi happen where multiple requests for more security after attacks on the US compounds were denied for political reasons and four Americans including a US Ambassador were murdered. The three other personnel were all prior military but as I said in the title; the Democrats have a war going on against the military especially Hilary. If you want an insight to how both Bill and Hilary feel about our military, read the book “Dereliction of Duty”, by Lieutenant Colonel Patterson and you will see how Bill and Hilary treated our military secrets and the men and women in our military.

For the first two years of his presidency, President Obama and the liberals owned all three law making area, the House, Senate, and the Presidency, the same people who past a monstrosity of a bill without ever reading. Since President Obama has taken office; our military has been cut by 27% while two wars were going in full swing. This was not only irresponsible but put our troops at greater risk in which the Afghanistan casualty rate has skyrocketed; 74% of all Afghanistan casualties are under him. He allowed China to have free rein at US Nuclear Labs, one day later the China launches offensive weapons in space to take out our military satellites and what does our president do; nothing. We also have Former U.S. Deputy Undersecretary of the Navy Seth Cropsey who told an audience at the Heritage Foundation that, “American sea power and global projection is in trouble.” If that wasn’t enough, he has staged photo op with the remains of our soldiers for political reasons. He has demoralized the military by removing on a whim the DADT (Don’t Ask Don’t Tell) policy without a mitigation strategy; we in the military for years knew there were gay people working next to us but we didn’t care. Now you will have a logistical nightmare for instance; if you have gay men and women in barracks to room together, are you going to allow a heterosexual male and female to room together; if you don’t it are sexual preference discrimination against heterosexuals. 

The VA debacle is the fault of all our presidents and senators back to the Vietnam War but President Bush did make efforts (not enough in my mind) to help the military using the VA. He knew there was a problem and in a letter to President Obama even stated as much but President Obama as all liberals, doesn’t care about the military so ignored it. After a few years it blew up in his face and he took weeks to comment on it. Jay Carney (The presidents lie dog) said the president told him he didn’t learn about the VA problems until he heard it on the news in 2014; but didn’t President Obama receive that letter from President Bush in 2008? Until it becomes political, no liberal wants to do anything to help the military or a vet and Hilary Clinton and President Obama are no different. President Obama said he would not tolerate this type treatment of veterans but hasn’t he for the last 6 years. By the way, if the government can’t take care of just over 21 million veterans in a government medical system without screwing it up; how are the going to take care of 314 million people under Obamacare? Now the Obama administration is declaring “All Veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan” are now considered “Public Enemy Number One”. President Obama stated he wanted a “Civilian National Security Force” equal to the Military; Why? Could it be that his hatred, as is with most all liberals, toward the military is setting up a future agenda of disbanding the military especially since the military came out and said it wouldn’t disarm the public if given that order? 

I was in the military under five different presidents and have watched the same thing over and over; the Democratic presidents gut the military and the Republican presidents try and build them back up. As history has showed us, pulling out without establishing a strong foundation only gets people killed; can you say Vietnam and Iraq. How long did we stay in Germany and Japan after WWII. Oh, we are still there and we had the same problem there, just look up what happened in the Black Forest. We will be back in Iraq and that area because we didn't finish the job of showing them what freedom is. We will continue to loose people overseas and stateside as long as we call Jihad work place violence like at Fort Hood which was a slap in the face to all military and refuse to protect assets like Benghazi, demoralizing the military again be not letting the Quick Reactionary Force do what the were trained to do; saving people. Let me know if you feel the same way.

Islam and Their Belief Against All

When ever you first talk to a Muslim person they assure you the are a peaceful and honorable religion. I have Muslim friends who are true moderate Muslims and tell me the way most Muslims present themselves is a charade and not how they truly feel. They tell me that "Moderate Muslims" at the most is 15% of the Muslim population but fear speaking out because if caught by a person considering themselves to be a "True Believer" (their words, not mine) they will be murdered in an "Honor Killing". I told them, "You're in America, you have freedom of speech!" his reply was, "Honor killings go on more often here then the authorities know". Islam and the Muslim religion is a belief and many do not realize what their belief actually direct them to do. Our politically correct society and media has made it even worse because anytime you say anything against Islam and the Muslim religion they try and brand you a Islamophobic. This is to shut down the conversation because it would be a loosing debate for them with all the evidence at hand. To understand the Muslim religion you need to learn about it's history and what happened to cause the clash between the Muslim religion and all other religions.

Muhammad (whose name means "highly praised") was born in Mecca in 570 AD. His father died before his birth, and his mother died at when he was six. The young orphan was then raised by his uncle, a shepherd, at age 9 (some say 12), he joined his uncle on a caravan to Syria. At age 25, Muhammad was employed by Khadija, a wealthy Meccan widow 15 years his senior and they were married. All together Muhammad had 4 sexual slaves, had married 15 wives and divorced 4 of them: 2 before consummation, 1 after she looked at another male, and the last because she demanded it after he killed her father. His third wife, Aisha bint Abi Bakr, was married and the marriage was consummated when she was 6 years old. At the age of 40, Muhammad received the message from Allah. Fast forward to the 10 and 11 century, The Muslim armies were attacking all non-Muslims (including Christians and Jews) and murdering any and all people how would not convert to Islam. In 1095, armies of Christians from Europe responded to Pope Urban II’s plea to force the Muslim out of the Holy Land, hence the first Crusade started. Christians didn't attack the Muslims, the Muslims attacked the Christians and everyone else.

Since the Crusades, no Christian group on the bases of religion has attacked the Muslim people that wasn't in defense. Muslims bring up Israel's attack on them, Israel is not innocent but they attacks military structures and people who run Hezbollah and Hamas, on the other side of the coin you have Hezbollah and Hamas blowing up children on school busses and indiscriminately firing rockets into Israel; does this sound like a "peaceful and honorable religion?" Does kidnapping 300 Christian children sound like a "peaceful and honorable religion?" The worse part about it is the Nigerian Security Forces knew Boko Haram was coming hours before the 300 girls were kidnapped and did nothing; could it be because the government of Nigeria is Muslim? Have you noticed there isn't much outcry from the Muslim countries at the UN? This is the normal for the Islamic culture and the Muslim religion, just read "Slavery, Our Allies, and Ourselves", all the Muslim nations in the UN such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Jordan, Pakistan, UAE, Qatar, and Malaysia openly have slaves today and some of them are on the "UN's Human Rights Commission." If you are an American, what can get you killed by a Islamist? Well if you are a Christian, feminist, Jewish, gay, Buddhist, lesbian, Hindu, transgender, Atheist, bisexual, just to name a few reasons they can commit an Honor Killing (Murder). Do you notice we are all pretty much in the same boat; and if you are a female you have no rights at all and we need to do genital mutilation because you shouldn't enjoy sex! Don't think "Honor Killings" don't happen here because they do; just read "Muslim’s Peaceful Religion, Atrocities, and Honor Killings" to see the truth; but how is this happening here?

When you have people like Hilary Clinton who in her first act as Secretary of State was to reverse a ban on Prof. Tariq Ramadan from entering the country, a man known by the FBI to contributed and be a money man for terrorist, and she did it for political reasons; we have a problem. When she once again refuses to label and fought to keep Boko Haram off the US terror list once again for political reasons; we have a problem.When you have Benghazi happen and now we all know the administration knew it was a terrorist attack within an hour and lied about it being a protest over a film. When you have President Obama, Jay Carney, Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, David Axelrod, and many others in this administration lying about it to win the second term for President Obama; we have the biggest problem and all; and all of them should go to jail for being so inept at protecting American people and it's interest that they swore an oath to. They are are basically accomplices in the murder of four Americans. We currently have no less then 35 terrorist training camps in the US according to the FBI and our government won't send them packing! Why?

The truth of the matter is we are shooting our own selves in the foot. There are good moderate Muslims out there but they are not the majority and like it or not, Islam is a threat. Political correctness is killing us here, we are so afraid we might offend someone that we forget freedom doesn't mean freedom from being offended. One last note, you know how the Muslim leadership say they are "a peaceful and honorable religion" and you shouldn't say or draw anything to offends their prophet; this is how respectable they are of other religions.

I was going to insert some pictures of children which were beheaded (yes you heard me right) by this "Peaceful and Honorable" religion because of the Mohammad cartoon to show you how truly inhumane this peaceful religion is but decided against it. There were over 130 people killed because of the Mohammad cartoon. How many people do you think were killed by Christians and Jews because of the above Muslim artists drawings? Zero!

Betrayal in Benghazi Posted By Colonel Phil Handley

The combat code of the US Military is that we don’t abandon our dead or wounded on the battlefield. In US Air Force lingo, fighter pilots don’t  run off and leave their wingmen. If one of our own is shot down, still  alive and not yet in enemy captivity, we will either come to get him or  die trying. Among America’s fighting forces, the calm, sure knowledge  that such an irrevocable bond exists is priceless. Along with individual  faith and personal grit, it is a sacred trust that has often sustained  hope in the face of terribly long odds.

The disgraceful abandonment of our Ambassador and those brave  ex-SEALs who fought to their deaths to save others in that compound is  nothing short of dereliction-of-duty. Additionally, the patently absurd  cover-up scenario that was fabricated in the aftermath was an outright  lie in attempt to shield the President and the Secretary of State from  responsibility.

It has been over eight months since the attack on our compound in Benghazi. The White House strategy, with the aid of a “lap dog press”  has been to run out the clock before the truth is forthcoming. The  recent testimonies of the three “whistle blowers” have reopened the  subject and hopefully will lead to exposure and disgrace of those  responsible for this embarrassing debacle.

It would appear that the most recent firewall which the  Administration is counting on is the contention that there were simply  no military assets that could be brought to bear in time to make a  difference… mainly due to the unavailability of tanker support for
fighter aircraft. This is simply BS, regardless how many supposed  “experts” the Administration trot out to make such an assertion. The  bottom line is that even if the closest asset capable of response was  half-way around the world, you don’t just sit on your penguin *** and do  nothing. The fact is that the closest asset was not half-way around the  world, but as near as Aviano Air Base, Italy where two squadrons of  F-16Cs are based.

Consider the following scenario (all times Benghazi local):

When Hicks in Tripoli receives a call at 9:40 PM from Ambassador  Stevens informing him “Greg, we are under attack!” (his last words), he  immediately notifies all agencies and prepares for the immediate  initiation of an existing “Emergency Response Plan.” At AFRICON,  General Carter Ham attempts to mount a rescue effort, but is told to  “stand down.” By 10:30 PM an unarmed drone is overhead the compound and  streaming live feed to various Command and Control Agencies… and  everyone watching that feed knew damn well what was going on. At 11:30  PM Woods, Doherty and five others leave Tripoli, arriving in Benghazi at  1:30 AM on Wednesday morning, where they hold off the attacking mob from the roof of the compound until they are killed by a mortar direct
hit at 4:00 AM.

So nothing could have been done, eh? Nonsense. If one assumes that tanker support really was not available… what about this:

• When at 10:00 PM AFRICON alerts the 31st TFW Command Post in Aviano Air Base, Italy of the attack, the Wing Commander orders preparation for the launch of two F-16s and advises the Command Post at NAS Sigonella to prepare for hot pit refueling and quick turn of the jets.

• By 11:30 PM, two F-16Cs with drop tanks and each armed with five hundred 20 MM rounds are airborne. Flying at 0.92 mach they will cover the 522 nautical miles directly to NAS Sigonella in 1.08 hours.

• While in-route, the flight lead is informed of the tactical situation, rules of engagement, and radio frequencies to use.

• The jets depart Sigonella at 1:10 AM with full fuel load and cover the 377 nautical miles directly to Benghazi in 0.8 hours, arriving
  at 1:50 AM… which would be 20 minutes after the arrival of Woods,  Doherty and their team.

• Providing that the two F-16s initial pass over the mob, in full afterburner at 200 feet and 550 knots did not stop the attack in
  its tracks, only a few well placed strafing runs on targets of opportunity would assuredly do the trick.

• Were the F-16s fuel state insufficient to recover at Sigonelli after jettisoning their external drop tanks, they could easily do so at
  Tripoli International Airport, only one-half hour away.

• As for those hand-wringing naysayers who would worry about IFR clearances, border crossing authority, collateral damage, landing
  rights, political correctness and dozens of other reasons not to act… screw them. It is high time that our “leadership” get their priorities straight and put America’s interests first.

The end result would be that Woods and Doherty would be alive.

Dozens in the attacking rabble would be rendezvousing with “72 virgins”… and a clear message would have been sent to the next worthless POS terrorist contemplating an attack on Americans that it is not really a good idea to “tug on Superman’s cape.”

Of course all this would depend upon a Commander In Chief who was more concerned with saving the lives of those he put in harm’s way than getting his crew rest for a campaign fund raising event in Las Vegas the next day. As well as a Secretary of State that actually understood “What difference did it make?”, or a Secretary of Defense whose immediate response was not to the effect that “One of the military tenants is that you don’t commit assets until you fully understand the tactical situation.” Was he not watching a live feed from the unarmed drone… and he didn’t understand the tactical situation? YGBSM! (You've gotta be shittin me!)

Ultimately it comes down to the question of who gave that order to “stand down?”

Whoever that coward turns out to be should be exposed, removed from office, and face criminal charges for dereliction of duty. The combat forces of the United States of America deserve leadership that really does “have their back” when the chips are down.

Colonel Phil “Hands” Handley, USAF (Ret.) is credited with the highest speed air-to-air gun kill in the history of aerial combat. He flew operationally for all but 11 months of a 26-year career, in aircraft such as the F-86 Sabre, F-15 Eagle, and the C-130A Hercules. Additionally, he flew 275 combat missions during two tours in Southeast Asia in the F-4D and F-4E. His awards include the Silver Star, &n... 3 Distinguished Flying Crosses, and 21 Air Medals.

Terrorism: Why Islam is Taking the US

After 911 we should all be aware of the threat of terrorist and terrorism and fight it at every term to keep our homeland safe. Our Constitution which every president promises to uphold tells us we must "provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States Article 1, Sec 8"; this is the duty of every administration. So what has our current administration done?

One of the first acts of Hillary Clinton when she was Secretary of State was to reversed the decision refusing a visa to Prof. Tariq Ramadan, a known terrorist money man as reported by the NY Times. Is this keeping us safe? Hillary Clinton refused to list Boko Haram as a terrorist group because it wouldn't look good for the election. So let me get this right, politics to win an election is more important then protecting our people. I wonder how many Boko Haram terrorist have come to visit the US. As you know this group kidnapped around 300 little girls to sell them as sex slaves because by their leader's own words, "It is Allah's Will". What the news didn't tell you about the girls who were abducted by this group is everyone of them were Christian. As with Benghazi, Mrs. Clinton and this administration hasn't protected a soul for political reasons then asks "What difference does it make."

There has been several groups put on the US Terrorist Watch list up until December 2008, a couple of groups that should be on the list by the current administration should have been Boko Haram and The Muslim Brotherhood.  The Muslim Brotherhood who denounced violence in 1970 but in reality uses Hamas to do their dirty work; they supply Hamas, fund Hamas, train Hamas, and out right supports Hamas calling Hamas "Their role model". With all the facts out in the open about why Hillary Clinton didn't add Boko Haram to the watch list, why won't this administration designate The Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group like all our allies have? The reason isn't to win an election but may be because if this administration does list them as a terrorist organization, then President Obama's half brother, Malik Obama will then be considered a terrorist.

I ask you, "Why isn't our government protecting us?" At Fort Hood you have 13 people killed by someone stating they are a terrorist and our president calls it "Work Place Violence", I guess 911 was as well by those standards. It is because of political correctness, political ambition, and lack of true patriotism as shown by the current administration that we are under grave danger from terrorist. When the "First Lady" at a ceremony honoring the American flag says, "All this for a damn flag" and the president agrees; we are in trouble.

The Truth About Slavery and Racism

It is strange but a constant how our history keeps evolving when ever the media or politicians get evolved. What is more astonishing is how our minorities in this country never research the history of civil rights but believe what ever the media and politicians say, the same ones who keep lying to us day in and out. If you are a minority, have you researched your history to see what is fact an what is fiction; I bet not. History doesn't evolve no matter what the politicians say and many of them who say they marched for equal rights never left the couch. It was and still is a worth while fight but the problem is most minorities do not see that they once again becoming slaves of a chosen group of elitist so lets take a look at history.

September 22, 1862: Republican President Abraham Lincoln issues preliminary Emancipation Proclamation.

January 1, 1863: Emancipation Proclamation, implementing the Republicans’ Confiscation Act of 1862, takes effect: The Democratic Party continues to Support Slavery.

February 9, 1864: Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton deliver over 100,000 signatures to U.S. Senate supporting Republicans’ plans for constitutional amendment to ban slavery.

June 15, 1864: Republican Congress votes equal pay for African-American troops serving in U.S. Army during Civil War.

January 31, 1865: 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous Republican support, intense Democrat opposition: Republican Party Support: 100% Democratic Party Support: 23%.

April 8, 1865: 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate: Republican support 100% Democrat support 37%.

November 22, 1865: Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting “black codes,” which institutionalized racial discrimination.

December 6, 1865: Republican Party’s 13th Amendment, banning slavery, is ratified.

*1865: The KKK launches as the “Terrorist Arm” of the Democratic Party.

May 10, 1866: U.S. House passes Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the laws to all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no.

July 16, 1866: Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of Freedman’s Bureau Act, which protected former slaves from “black codes” denying their rights. Black Codes- Enacted in 1865 and 1866, the laws were designed to replace the social controls of slavery that had been removed by the Emancipation Proclamation and the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

July 30, 1866: Democrat-controlled City of New Orleans orders police to storm racially-integrated Republican meeting; raid kills 40 and wounds more than 150.

March 30, 1868: Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson, who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men”.

1868 (July 9): 14th Amendment passes and recognizes newly freed slaves as U.S. Citizens: Republican Party Support: 94% Democratic Party Support: 0%.

September 3, 1868: 25 African-Americans in Georgia legislature, all Republicans, expelled by Democrat majority; later reinstated by Republican Congress.

October 7, 1868: Republicans denounce Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule”.

November 3, 1868: Republican Ulysses Grant defeats Democrat Horatio Seymour in presidential election; Seymour had denounced Emancipation Proclamation.

December 10, 1869: Republican Gov. John Campbell of Wyoming Territory signs FIRST-in-nation law granting women right to vote and to hold public office.

February 3, 1870: The US House ratifies the 15th Amendment granting voting rights to all Americans regardless of race: Republican support: 97% Democrat support: 3%.

February 25, 1870: Hiram Rhodes Revels becomes the first Black seated in the US Senate, becoming the First Black in Congress and the first Black Senator. A Black Democrat Senator didn’t show up for 123 years later on Capitol Hill until 1993.

April 20, 1871: Republican Congress enacts the (anti) Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans.

The Congressional records don't lie, there was a strong push in the Democratic party against all civil rights legislation, look up the following:

Civil Rights Act 1866
Reconstruction Act of 1867
Freedman Bureau Extension Act of 1866
Enforcement Act of 1870
Force Act of 1871
Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871
Civil Rights Act of 1875
Civil Rights Act of 1957
Civil Rights Act of 1960

And during the 60's many Democrats fought hard to defeat the:

1964 Civil Rights Act
1965 Voting Rights Acts
1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act, Congressional records show after signing the 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act and issuing Executive Order 11478, Richard Nixon, a Republican, that started what we know as Affirmative Action.

On December 15, 1994, federal Judge David V. Kenyon issued a court order to the Clinton Administration in the Case of Fairchild v Robert Reich Secretary of Labor (#CV92-5765 Kn). The order demanded that Secretary Reich and the Clinton Administration force 100 west coast shipping to develop an Affirmative Action plan to stop discrimination against, African Americans, Hispanics, Female and Disabled Workers. Female employees were being sexually harrassed, Hispanic were being denied promotions and training, Disable Workers were being laid off, and African Americans were being force to work in an environment where they had job classification called " Nigger Jobs." Clinton left office six years later and never complied with the court order.

I know, this is old news but I believe racism needs to be stomped out where ever it is, but it needs to be done on all sides. Why does the NAACP come out if someone attacks a Democrat but not a Republican; what about  Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson calling Clarence Thomas an 'Uncle Tom'?

Donald Sterling is band for life for racist comments (rightfully so) but Democratic politicians and leaders are still making racist remark with no repercussions; the same should be done to them as was Donald Sterling. Below are some examples:

Al Sharpton & Micheal Eric Dyson Under Fire For racist remarks

Charles Rangel's Racist remarks

Charles Rangel's Racist remarks 2

Al Sharpton's Racial Remarks

Al Sharpton's Racial Remarks 2

The president even said "White folks' greed runs a world in need", this is racism today which shows the Democratic party hasn't changed a bit. By indoctrinating youth that they are "owed and entitled" to other peoples money instead of making people stand on their own two feet and being responsible for their own destiny, the Democratic party has almost single handedly assured the next fifty years of race fighting. The redistributing of wealth does nothing to help a soul and will just bring our nation down. Look up our history; you can't trust the politicians or the media to tell you the truth about anything past or present.