Before we can answer this question,
we need to take a look at the worlds history and the places and positions self
appointed or inferred from the rest of the world, that the US finds itself
in. When WWII started, all other nations believed, even if they didn't say so,
that Germany and Japan would
rule the world because no one nation had the ability to stand up to them. The
US was mainly a isolationist country and wanted nothing to do with another
"World War", many in the US believed "we can take care of
ourselves, they can take care of themselves; unfortunately we learned quickly
that we are all in this world together. On 7 December 1941, Japan made sure we knew this couldn't be by
their unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor. No
one knew just how great the US
was until this point and then as Admiral Yamamoto said, "We have done
nothing but awoke a sleeping giant."
After WWII we became the
"World Police" mainly because the newly formed United Nations (UN)
was too inept to handle any problems just as they are today and in many cases
are the ones causing the problems. When many communist countries wanted to take
over smaller countries we, many times on our own, stopped them in their tracks,
this was accomplished with the military doing their part unfettered by politics
crossing into their lane. This changed in the 1960s with the Vietnam War,
instead of telling the military go, fight, and win, we had politicians telling
them how to fight and where they couldn't fight; this was started with our
first truly liberal president, President Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ). Instead
of fighting a line war where the enemy was on one side and you on the other, we
went to fighting FOB (Forward Operating Base) style wars which do not work well
and cost the US soldier more
casualties
which Vietnam showed. Vietnam
ended up being a draw because liberals will not do what is necessary to win the
war, protect our country, protect our troops, or stop problems before they
explode like ISIS/ISIL. President
Bush said what would happen if we pulled out of Iraq
in 2007 before Iraq
was ready and he was right.
We kept being the "World
Police" and when the third largest army in the world (Iraq) invaded Kuwait, we answered the call. Our
presidents for the last 10 years were not liberal and had given the military
all the required equipment they needed to do their job and appointed General
Schwarzkopf as the tactician with no political influence on his plans. All the
liberals were yelling we would have thousands of US casualties which with their
hatred of the military made you wonder if they were hoping for mass casualties;
but with 34 countries helping and the US in the lead (as it should always be),
the battle took less then 100 hrs with only 292 of
all coalition troops killed. General Schwarzkopf created a line and went
strait through Iraq then secured the borders to stop any terrorist from coming
in, this is another reason the casualty count was so low; we should have taken
Saddam Hussein out then but some liberal politicians controlling congress said
no. If we would have and stayed, then today it would be like a Germany or
Japan back in the 60s which would be better then what we have today. You have
to spend time in an area to change their ideology from barbaric to
civilized.
We didn't learn and had to return
to Iraq and this time we did take Saddam Hussein out but we went back to the
FOB ideology which was what got 58,220 Americans
killed in Vietnam, and the same did happen again with 7,148 killed in Iraq and Afghanistan; it
make you think about that old quote, "If you don't learn from history, you
are doomed to repeat it." During the Clinton
presidency, President Clinton who is a liberal ignored Al Qaeda and Osama Bin
Laden and played it down as no true threat to the US
which cost the US
2,973 people in the 9/11 attack and a reported 160,131 more from inhaling the
toxic dust afterwards not to account for our troops killed. I would hate to see
what a true threat is in the liberal's eyes. The ISIS
leader was released in 2009 by President Obama being deemed as no threat to
anyone, on 20 Jan 2014, President Obama referring to ISIS/ISIL as the Junior Varsity and
not a threat, then tries to blame
it on others instead of the true catalyst, himself. Now we have pictures of
the ISIS/ISIL with their flag in front of the our White House, we have
ISIS/ISIL people flying their flags on their houses in the US, and of course a
wide open southern border and now ISIS/ISIL
has 11 jet liners, can you say 9/11? Do you really believe ISIS/ISIL is no
threat or is it another liberal president putting our country in danger? This
is the main reason liberals want to change the history in our history books, to
cover up all their failures.
I am a Libertarian so by nature I
lean toward being an isolationist but I also live in reality, I know when you
have a Global Threat like ISIS/ISIL you must crush it into oblivion. I know if
we are going to go into these countries and try to make a difference, we need
to stay for the long haul like we did in Germany
and Japan.
I know not securing our boarder and having 20 million people who we do not know
in our country does not make us safe but venerable. And I know if we keep
gutting our military like the liberals have been doing for years, we soon will
not have a country or anyone to defend it. ISIS/ISIL just like Al Qaeda and
will try anything to destroy the US if they get half a chance; why
can't our liberal politicians see this? I predict we will have another 9/11
style attack soon and the ones to blame are the liberal Democrats and
Republicans who refuse to secure our borders; I hope and pray I am wrong but
all intelligent agencies say it is imminent. When are we going to start electing
people who care about our country instead of their own pocket? They are putting
us in grave danger once again.
good read, I am with you
ReplyDeletewonder how many people really know/see this.
ReplyDelete