Stupid Anti-Gun Companies Who Want Employees and Customers to Die!
I will never shop at Walgreens again, only after a robber tried to shoot him, did Walgreen employee, Jeremy Hoven pull his pistol and shot at the robbers who then fled; his reward was to be fired. Jeremy Hoven had been robbed in 2007, he asked Walgreens for extra security but they refused. Michigan’s liberal judge, Karen Nelson Moore said, “Michigan Self-Defense Act doesn't confer an unlimited right to engage in self-defense.” So a man tries to murder me and I don’t have the right to defend myself under the Michigan Self-Defense Act? Let’s see what the act says:
(1) An individual who has not or is not engaged in the commission of a crime at the time he or she uses deadly force may use deadly force against another individual anywhere he or she has the legal right to be with no duty to retreat if either of the following applies:
(a) The individual honestly and reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent the imminent death of or imminent great bodily harm to himself or herself or to another individual.
So the attempted murder tries to murder but is stopped by the one he tried to murder and to this judge it doesn’t match the above; she needs to be removed from the bench, she is pushing an agenda not the law as is the case with most every liberal judge.
Now I will go to Meador Pharmacy in Arkansas, where a robber was threatening the life of a pharmacist who then pulled his legal concealed weapon and killed the robber. This is how it should go every time possible; shot the robber, rapist, or carjacker and we have no court cost, incarceration cost, and one less thug on the streets. Liberals will never get this because it makes since to punish the criminal instead of the victim and they will never figure out that criminals never pay attention to the law. When you have a “Gun Free Zone”, the only thing you are doing is telling criminals that all the law abiding citizens who are allowed to carry a gun isn’t so there is no threat to you. Does this sound like a logical action or one that endangers more people?
The 2nd Amendment states-A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
So you cannot infringe on gun ownership without violating the US Constitution but this has never stopped a liberal like President Obama. First they tried to get a gun ban which was shot down by the US Supreme Court as unconstitutional, then they tried to make everyone have a million dollar insurance policy for every gun you owned which also was shot down by the US Supreme Court. I thought they would learn but instead of accepting the law they tried to buy every round (1.6 billion) in the US to prevent citizens from buying the ammo, they even bought rounds the government doesn’t use but now there money has ran dry. I thought surely they have learned now but no, the president is trying to do an executive order to ban the most common round used in America the 5.56mm which is once again unconstitutional.
If you are pro-gun, you should never vote for another Democrat or liberal Republican as long as you live, they have shown they have no respect for your rights, the Supreme Court, or the US Constitution. You always have a knee jerk reaction to these mass shootings but the liberal side who is always pushing their anti-gun agenda will never try to listen and fix the problem, because if the problem is fixed, they will never be able to ban them. The more criminals shot and killed the less that will rob you. The more unstable persons (truly unstable, not identified for an agenda) identified by psychiatrist and uploaded to the no buy list the better. You have a crazy anti-gun man attacks an innocent man for what, for having a legally concealed weapon; he is luck he wasn’t shot. This isn’t uncommon, and it isn’t the law abiding gun owners doing the attacking, it’s the anti-gun nuts. Just like it isn’t the law abiding gun owner robbing you, it’s the criminal who has no regard for the law, just like the liberals.